Monday, 31 March 2025

Trump Trade Wars Week. US Jobs Week. UK Tax Hike Week.

Baltic Dry Index. 1602 -19          Brent Crude 73.40

Spot Gold 3115               US 2 Year Yield 3.89  -0.08  

US Federal Debt. 36.664 trillion!!

“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win.”

Donald Trump.

It is the end of the month and end of the quarter in the global stock casinos, with all about to get hit from “Liberation Day,” President Trump’s tariff trade war Wednesday.

On Friday, the US stock casinos might get another shock from the latest US employment numbers, where there’s a chance that for the first time the DOGE firings and cutbacks will start showing up.

If the stock casinos drop into bear market territory this week, will Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway start deploying its Mount Everest of cash and start selectively acquiring new companies? If not, April is likely to get off to a record book bad start.

Japan's Nikkei slumps over 3% as fresh Trump tariffs due this week keep investors on edge

Updated Sun, Mar 30 2025 11:36 PM EDT

Asia-Pacific markets plunged Monday ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump’s fresh round of tariffs expected later in the week.

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 was down 3.85%, after having plunged over 4%, while the broader Topix index lost 3.26%.

Over in South Korea, the Kospi index fell 2.75% while the small-cap Kosdaq declined 2.63%.

Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 was down 1.63%.

Mainland China’s CSI 300 lost 0.67% while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 0.78%.

China’s NBS Manufacturing PMI for March came in at 50.5, in line with predictions by economists polled by Reuters slightly higher than 50.2 reading in the previous month.

Indian markets were closed for a public holiday.

U.S. futures slipped as investors await clarity on Trump’s tariff plans.

Stocks had sold off sharply last Friday, amid growing uncertainty on U.S. trade policy and a bleak inflation outlook.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 715.80 points, or 1.69%, at 41,583.90. The S&P 500 shed 1.97% to 5,580.94, ending the week down for the fifth time in the last six weeks. The Nasdaq Composite plunged 2.7% to settle at 17,322.99.

Shares of several technology giants dropped, putting pressure on the broader market. Google-parent Alphabet lost 4.9%, while Meta and Amazon each shed 4.3%.

Asia markets live: Stocks fall

Gold surges past $3,100 as US tariffs, uncertainty propel safe-haven flows

Published Sun, Mar 30 2025 10:56 PM EDT

Gold prices on Monday soared above $3,100 per ounce for the first time as concerns around U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the potential economic fallout, combined with geopolitical worries, drove a fresh wave of investments into the safe-haven asset.

Spot gold prices hit a record high of $3,106.50 per ounce.

Gold prices have hit multiple record highs, gaining more than 18% so far this year - capitalising on its cachet as hedge against economic and geopolitical turbulence.

Earlier this month, it breached the psychological $3,000 per ounce mark for the first time - a significant milestone that experts say reflects growing concerns over economic instability, geopolitical tensions and inflation.

Bullion’s rally has prompted multiple banks to increase their price forecasts for gold this year.

“For now, gold’s appeal as a safe haven and inflation hedge has further strengthened in light of these geopolitical concerns and tariff uncertainty. We remain constructive on the outlook of gold amid ongoing global trade friction and uncertainty,” said analysts at OCBC.

Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and UBS have all raised their price targets for the yellow metal this month, with Goldman forecasting gold to hit $3,300/oz by the end of the year, up from $3,100. BofA expects gold to trade at $3,063/oz in 2025 and $3,350/oz in 2026 - an increase from its previous forecasts of $2,750/oz for 2025 and $2,625/oz for 2026.

Trump has floated plans for a series of new tariffs aimed at protecting U.S. industries and reducing trade deficits since he took office, including a 25% tariffs on imported cars and auto parts, as well as an additional 10% on all imports from China. He intends to announce a fresh set of reciprocal tariffs on April 2.

“Tariff issues will continue driving (gold) prices higher until there is some finality to the tit-for-tat campaign,” Marex consultant Edward Meir said.

Additional factors, like robust central bank demand and exchange-traded fund inflows, will also continue supporting gold’s stunning rally this year, analysts and investment banks say. 

Gold surges past $3,100 as US tariffs, uncertainty propel safe-haven flows

US stocks tumble as consumer gloom raises stagflation fears

Americans express rising alarm over economy and job prospects as Trump’s tariffs weigh on outlook

28 March 2025

Wall Street stocks dropped on Friday as signs of strain among American consumers added to worries the US is heading for a bout of stagflation.

A batch of data added fresh evidence that consumers are growing deeply concerned about how President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs will affect the world’s largest economy, while a separate report showed the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure rose in February.

The gloomy data comes at a time when investors are worried that Trump’s trade levies combined with a broader sense of uncertainty will hurt US economic growth while also increasing price pressures. The new reports sent investors rushing away from US equities and into havens.

----“US data is only inflaming stagflation fears,” said James Knightley, an economist at investment bank ING. “Hot inflation and cooling consumer spending are trends that are likely to be intensified by President Trump’s aggressive moves on tariffs and government spending cuts.”

A survey by the University of Michigan released on Friday showed that consumer sentiment plunged in March as Americans worried about their job prospects, inflation and income levels. Households also forecast inflation over the long term of 4.1 per cent, the highest since 1993.

----Consumer spending, meanwhile, rose 0.4 per cent last month, a reversal from January’s 0.3 per cent decline, but not as strong as the 0.5 per cent increase economists forecast, a separate report from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis showed.

Pantheon Macroeconomics’ senior US economist Oliver Allen said the consumer spending data was “disappointing” and that an “underlying slowdown in demand growth also seems to be under way”.

Goldman Sachs cut its forecast for first-quarter GDP in response to the weak data, by 0.4 percentage points to an annualised growth rate of 0.6 per cent, citing “softer than expected” personal spending growth in February and a downward revision to January’s figure.

The Atlanta Fed also cut its running forecast for first-quarter GDP to show a contraction of 2.8 per cent on an annualised basis, compared with 1.8 per cent as recently as Wednesday. Its model has contrasted with Wall Street banks, which broadly still expect growth in early 2025.

The BEA’s report on Friday also showed that the core reading of the personal consumption expenditure price index was up 2.8 per cent in February from a year ago.

Economists expected the index, a measure that is closely watched by the Fed which strips out food and energy, to be up 2.7 per cent, unchanged from January’s upwardly revised rate. The main PCE index rose 2.5 per cent last month, unchanged from January.

More

US stocks tumble as consumer gloom raises stagflation fears

The Era of Cheap Stuff Was Already Ending. Now Comes the Tariff Threat.

Goods prices are rising after decades of deflation, and Trump’s tariffs will give an added push

March 30, 2025 5:00 am ET

President Trump’s tariffs threaten to amplify a big inflation challenge: Even before the new levies landed, a long run of everyday stuff getting cheaper was coming to a close.

Most prices gradually go up most of the time. But over the 20 years before the pandemic, the basket of physical products that typical shoppers buy didn’t get even a cent more expensive.

Prices of core goods in the consumer-price index—that is, excluding food and fuel—fell 1.7% between December 2011 and December 2019. Over the same period, prices of core services like housing, healthcare and education rose 2.7% a year. The combined effect of rising service and falling goods prices was a core inflation rate of 2% a year overall.

Goods prices shot up during the pandemic, peaking in summer 2023 then declining over the following 12 months. But in September, core goods prices started rising again, by an average of 0.1% a month, including 0.2% in February.

“You’ve got high readings for goods inflation, after a string of readings that average close to zero,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said during a press conference this month. 

Powell said that the increase is probably partly because of tariffs and partly because of other factors.

“The recent data are telling us that for goods, you won’t have that same deflationary impulse as you did during the 2010s,” said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TSLombard, a research firm.  

Blitz thinks goods inflation will help push up overall prices by about 3% this year, above the Fed’s 2% target. After falling sharply from its 2022 peak, core inflation using the Fed’s preferred metric has stalled between 2.6% and 3%.

More

The Era of Cheap Stuff Was Already Ending. Now Comes the Tariff Threat.  - WSJ

In other news.

Japan, China, South Korea discuss free trade deal amid Trump tariffs

30 March 2025

Industry ministers from Japan, China, and South Korea have returned to the idea of free trade between their countries. This comes just days before the US is expected to introduce new tariffs worldwide, Bloomberg reports.

South Korea’s Minister of Industry Ahn Duk-geun, along with his counterparts from Japan, Yoji Muto, and China, Wang Wentao, discussed a free trade agreement on Sunday in Seoul.

It is noted that while they did not make significant progress toward such an agreement, the meeting demonstrated a growing willingness among the three countries to strengthen ties amid the impact of US tariffs.

"We especially recognized the need for ongoing trilateral economic and trade cooperation to effectively address emerging challenges and achieve tangible outcomes in key areas," the three ministers said in a joint statement.

They also pledged to strengthen the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a framework aimed at optimizing supply chains and expanding trade and investment among Asia's largest economies, including China, Japan, and South Korea. The United States is not part of this agreement.

The meeting took place as a 25% US tariff on imported cars is set to take effect on April 3 at 12:01 a.m. Washington time. Notably, Japan and South Korea are major exporters of vehicles to the US.

More

Japan, China, South Korea discuss free trade deal amid Trump tariffs

‘Trump Slump’ Looms as Foreign Visitors Rethink Travel to U.S.

A growing number of travelers say they are worried about feeling unwelcome or unsafe in America and are reluctant to support the economy of a country that may be destabilizing other nations.

March 26, 2025

International tourists detained at U.S. borders. Steep tariffs imposed on trade partnersThreats against longtime allies.

The onslaught of contested policies and language by the Trump administration in recent weeks is causing tourists around the globe to either cancel or reconsider travel to the United States. A growing number of visitors say they feel unwelcome or unsafe and are reluctant to support the economy of a country that some foreign officials say is waging trade wars and destabilizing its allies. A draft of a new travel ban circulating through the administration could restrict citizens from up to 43 countries, including Belarus, Cambodia and St. Lucia, from entering the United States.

“So many Americans are looking to escape the tense and toxic atmosphere at home. Why would anyone want to visit, especially right now with all the arbitrary detentions at immigration?” said Mallory Henderson, 53, a marketing consultant in London who usually visits the United States twice a year, but canceled a trip to visit her brother and niece in Boston this Easter.

“It’s a really hostile and scary time, and quite frankly, there’s plenty of other inviting and pleasant places I can go to meet up with my family,” she said.

Even before the change in administration in January, the U.S. travel industry was struggling to recover from the pandemic, mainly because of the strength of the dollar, which makes it more expensive for foreign travelers to visit, and long visa wait times. Inbound international visitor numbers were not expected to reach 2019 levels until later this year and foreign visitor spending is not projected to fully recover until 2026, according to the U.S. Travel Association.

But those expectations may now be even harder to reach, travel experts say.

The research firm Tourism Economics had originally forecast travel to the United States to grow by 9 percent this year, but in February, it updated its outlook, expecting inbound travel to decline by 5.1 percent and hotel demand to decline by 0.8 percent in 2025 — the equivalent of an $18 billion drop in spending. Much of the decline is the result of a boycott by Canadian travelers. In February, after President Trump announced tariffs on Canada, the number of Canadians driving across the border fell by 24 percent compared with the same period in 2024.

More

Foreign Travelers Are Rethinking Travel to the U.S. - The New York Times

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians, inflation now needs an entire section of its own.

Goldman Sachs sees Trump tariffs spiking inflation, stunting growth and raising recession risks

Published Sun, Mar 30 2025 9:47 PM EDT

With decision day looming this week for President Donald Trump’s latest round of tariffs, Goldman Sachs expects aggressive duties from the White House to raise inflation and unemployment and drag economic growth to a near-standstill.

The investment bank now expects that tariff rates will jump 15 percentage points, its previous “risk-case” scenario that now appears more likely when Trump announces reciprocal tariffs on Wednesday. However, Goldman did note that product and country exclusions eventually will pull that increase down to 9 percentage points.

When the new trade moves are enacted, the Goldman economic team led by head of global investment research Jan Hatzius sees a broad, negative impact on the economy.

In a note published on Sunday, the firm said “we continue to believe the risk from April 2 tariffs is greater than many market participants have previously assumed.”

Inflation above goal

On inflation, the firm sees its preferred core measure, excluding food and energy prices, hitting 3.5% in 2025, a 0.5 percentage point increase from the prior forecast and well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal.

That in turn will come with weak economic growth: Just a 0.2% annualized growth rate in the first quarter and 1% for the full year when measured from the fourth quarter of 2024 to Q4 of 2025, down 0.5 percentage point from the prior forecast. In addition, the Wall Street firm now sees unemployment reaching 4.5%, a 0.3 percentage point raise from the previous forecast.

Taken together, Goldman now expects a 35% chance of recession in the next 12 months, up from 20% in the prior outlook.

The forecast paints a growing chance of a stagflation economy, with low growth and high inflation. The last time the U.S. saw stagflation was in the late 1970s and early ’80s. Back then, the Paul Volcker-led Fed dramatically raised interest rates, sending the economy into recession as the central bank chose fighting inflation over supporting economic growth.

More

Tariffs to spike inflation, stunt growth and raise recession risks, Goldman says

US economy meltdown as stocks tumble in wake of Donald Trump tariffs

29 March 2025

US stocks on Wall Street fell on Friday amid growing concerns among consumers and investors about Donald Trump's tariff policy. The S&P 500 dropped 2%, while the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite slid 2.7%.

However, US government debt rallied, pushing the 10-year Treasury yield down 0.11 percentage points to 4.26%. "US data is only inflaming stagflation fears," James Knightley, an economist at investment bank ING, told the Financial Times.

"Hot inflation and cooling consumer spending are trends that are likely to be intensified by President Trump's aggressive moves on tariffs and government spending cuts."

Last week, the US President announced new import taxes of 25% on cars and car parts coming into the US.

Trump said the latest tariffs would come into effect on April 2, with charges on businesses importing vehicles starting over the next days. Taxes on spare parts are set to start in May or later.

He claimed that the tariffs would lead to "tremendous growth" for the industry, and create jobs and investment in the US.

However, analysts at ING - a Dutch multinational banking and financial services company - have argued that tariffs introduced by Trump in his first term had no discernible positive effect on the US economy.

They wrote: "In 2018, Trump imposed tariffs, particularly on China, but loopholes allowed some production to be diverted to third-party nations, such as Vietnam and Korea.

"These actions failed to generate any meaningful improvement in US manufacturing performance, with the output volumes actually down 0.25% from where they were at the beginning of 2018; unemployment levels were unchanged."

They added that Trump's new tariffs could potentially hit every single American with an extra $2000 (£1545) in annual costs.

The US imported about eight million cars last year - accounting for about $240bn (£186bn) in trade and roughly half of overall sales.

Mexico is the top supplier of cars to the US, followed by South Korea, Japan, Canada and Germany.

Trump's tariff announcement provoked a furious response from world leaders and threats of retaliation.

Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney promised a tough response and in a statement on Friday his office said Toronto plans to implement retaliatory tariffs on US goods next week.

"The Prime Minister informed the President that his government will implement retaliatory tariffs to protect Canadian workers and our economy, following the announcement of additional US trade actions on April 2, 2025," the Prime Minister's Office said in a press release.

US economy meltdown as stocks tumble in wake of Donald Trump tariffs

Covid-19 Corner

This section will continue only occasionally when something of interest occurs.

 Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, among other things, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported.

New plastic dissolves in the ocean overnight, leaving no microplastics

By Michael Irving  March 27, 2025

Plastics are durable and strong, which is great while they’re being used but frustrating when they end up in the environment. Scientists at RIKEN in Japan have developed a new type of plastic that’s just as stable in everyday use but dissolves quickly in saltwater, leaving behind safe compounds.

The benefit of plastics is that they’re made with strong covalent bonds that hold their molecules together, meaning they take a lot of energy to break. This is why they’re so sturdy, long-lasting and perfect for everything from packaging to toys.

But those same strong bonds become a problem after the useful life of a plastic product is over. That cup you used once and threw away will sit in landfill for decades, even centuries, before it fully breaks down. And when it does, it forms microplastic pieces that are turning up in all corners of the natural world, including our own bodies, where they wreak havoc on our health in ways we’re only just beginning to understand.

RIKEN researchers have now developed a new type of plastic that can work just as well as the regular stuff when it’s needed, and break down readily into safe compounds when it’s not. It’s made of what are known as supramolecular polymers, which have reversible bonds that function like sticky notes that can be attached, removed and reattached, according to the team.

The team wanted to make a specific type of supramolecular polymer that would be strong enough for the usual uses of plastic, but could also be made to break down quickly when required, under mild conditions and leaving only non-toxic compounds.

After screening a range of molecules, the researchers identified a particular combination that seemed to have the right properties – sodium hexametaphosphate, which is a common food additive, and monomers based on guanidinium ions, which are used in fertilizers. When these two compounds are mixed together in water, they form a viscous material that can be dried to form plastics.

A reaction between the two ingredients forms “salt bridges” between the molecules that make the material strong and flexible, like conventional plastic. However, when they’re soaked in saltwater, the electrolytes unlock those bonds, and the material dissolves.

In practice, the team found that the material was just as strong as normal plastic during use, and was non-flammable, colorless and transparent. Immersed in saltwater though, the plastic completely dissolved in about eight and a half hours.

There’s one major hurdle with any degradable plastic material of course: what if it comes into contact with the catalyst for its destruction before you want it to? A plastic cup is no good if certain liquids can dissolve it, after all.

In this case, the team found that applying hydrophobic coatings prevented any early breaking down of the material. When you eventually want to dispose of it, a simple scratch on the surface was enough to let the saltwater back in, allowing the material to dissolve just as quickly as the non-coated sheets.

While some biodegradable plastics can still leave behind harmful microplastics, this material breaks down into nitrogen and phosphorus, which are useful nutrients for plants and microbes.

That said, too much of these can be disruptive to the environment as well, so the team suggests the best process might be to do the bulk of the recycling in specialized plants, where the resulting elements can be retrieved for future use.

But if some of it does end up in the ocean, it will be far less harmful, and possibly even beneficial, compared to current plastic waste.

New plastic dissolves in the ocean overnight, leaving no microplastics

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

We've been the foolish country for so long with this free trade, but it's not free trade because it's - you know, just doesn't work. I mean, it's not working. You look at the deficits we have.

Donald Trump.

Saturday, 29 March 2025

Special Update 29/03/2025 Smoot-Hawley 2.0 Week? UK Tax Hike Week.

Baltic Dry Index. 1602 -19            Brent Crude 73.63

Spot Gold 3085                  U S 2 Year Yield 3.89 -0.08

US Federal Debt. 36.655 trillion.

If all else fails immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Little need for my input this weekend as the articles below adequately sum up investor fears about the impact of Trump Tariff Wednesday and the start of Great Depression 2.0.

Dow closes 700 points lower as inflation and tariff fears worsen

Updated Fri, Mar 28 20257:13 PM EDT

Stocks sold off sharply on Friday, pressured by growing uncertainty on U.S. trade policy as well as a more grim outlook on inflation.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 715.80 points, or 1.69%, at 41,583.90. The S&P 500 shed 1.97% to 5,580.94, ending the week down for the fifth time in the last six weeks. The Nasdaq Composite plunged 2.7% to settle at 17,322.99.

Shares of several technology giants dropped, putting pressure on the broader market. Google-parent Alphabet lost 4.9%, while Meta and Amazon each shed 4.3%.

This week, the S&P 500 lost 1.53%, while the 30-stock Dow shed 0.96%. The Nasdaq declined by 2.59%. With this latest losing week, Nasdaq is now on pace for a more than 8% monthly decline, which would be its worst monthly performance since December 2022.

Stocks took a leg lower on Friday after the University of Michigan’s final read on consumer sentiment for March reflected the highest long-term inflation expectations since 1993.

Friday’s core personal consumption expenditures price index also came out hotter-than-expected, rising 2.8% in February and reflecting a 0.4% increase for the month, stoking concerns about persistent inflation. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for respective numbers of 2.7% and 0.3%. Consumer spending accelerated 0.4% for the month, below the 0.5% forecast, according to fresh data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

“The market is getting squeezed by both sides. There is uncertainty around next week’s reciprocal tariffs hitting the major exporting sectors like tech alongside concerns about a weakening consumer facing higher prices hitting areas like discretionary,” said Scott Helfstein, head of investment strategy at Global X.

Helfstein added, however, that the news on inflation and consumer spending “was not that bad” and could simply represent a hiccup in near-term sentiment as investors struggle to understand the Trump administration’s new policies.

“Despite today’s sell-off and broader market volatility of the past few weeks, there have not been big inflows into money markets. It seems like a lot of investors are trying to ride this out,” he said.

The latest inflation report comes amid a flurry of tariff announcements from the White House, which have roiled the market in recent weeks. Investors are looking ahead to April 2, when President Donald Trump is expected to announce further tariff plans, for further clarity.

On Friday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney told Trump that the Canadian government will implement retaliatory tariffs following Wednesday’s announcements. Bloomberg earlier reported that the European Union is identifying concessions it could make to Trump’s administration to reduce the reciprocal tariffs from the U.S.

Trump earlier this week announced a 25% tariff on “all cars that are not made in the United States,” a decision that hurt auto stocks and raised concerns of an economic slowdown.

Stock market updates for March 28, 2025

US Consumers Are Panicking Over Reignited Inflation

March 28, 2025

The Trump administration’s continuing barrage of tariff threats, as well as the Republican president’s looming deadline for automakers next week, sent investors running for the exits again on Friday. With just one session left until the end of a quarter that’s set to be the worst for the S&P 500 since 2022, the gauge slid another 2%. 

It also didn’t help that the latest data showed US consumer sentiment tumbled to a more than two-year low while long-term inflation expectations jumped to a 32-year high as American anxiety over Trump’s handling of the economy continues to build.

The final March sentiment index declined to 57 from 64.7 a month earlier, according to the University of Michigan. The latest reading was below both the 57.9 preliminary number and the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of economists. Consumers expect prices to rise at an annual rate of 4.1% over the next five to 10 years, the data released Friday showed. That’s the highest since—wait for it—1993.

Consumers also see costs rising 5% over the next 12 months, the highest since 2022. But even more foreboding is what Americans see for the country’s jobs market. For years, the US has left the rest of the post-pandemic world behind with low employment levels not seen since the 1960s, when Richard Nixon was president. “Notably,” said Joanne Hsu, director of the Michigan survey, “two-thirds of consumers expect unemployment to rise in the year ahead, the highest reading since 2009.”

US Consumers Are Panicking Over Reignited Inflation: Evening Briefing Americas - Bloomberg

Now Comes The Great Big Trump-O-Nomics Auto Crash

david stockman

Mar 28

What can you do when the nation elects an economic crackpot who foolishly thinks that the blessings of trillions in global trade amount to theft from the United States? And, on top of that folly, has a wide-open unilateral authority under the various ultra-rubbery trade statutes to impose billions in “taxation without representation” on the American people in the guise of import tariffs.

Well, that’s where we are right now—meaning that the brown stuff will be hitting the fan with relentless caprice from here into so-called Liberation Day (April 2) and beyond. In fact, today’s installment in the form of the 25% auto tariff announced last night is utterly irrational and unjustified, but it’s just the warm-up act: The so-called “reciprocal trade” levies to be imposed apparently on all 232 of America’s global trading partners will literally amount to the “Mother of All Shit Shows”, as we have been documenting in recent days...

More subscription required.

Now Comes The Great Big Trump-O-Nomics Auto Crash

Flight bookings between Canada and US down 70% amid Trump tariff war

Airline capacity between two countries reduced through October 2025 as high-profile incidents of Ice arrests on rise

Thu 27 Mar 2025 14.38 GMT

Airline travel between Canada and the US is “collapsing” amid Donald Trump’s tariff war, with flight bookings between the two countries down by over 70%, newly released data suggests.

According to data from the aviation analytics company OAG, airline capacity between Canada and the US has been reduced through October 2025, with the biggest cuts occurring between the months of July and August, which is considered peak travel season. Passenger bookings on Canada to US routes are currently down by over 70% compared to the same period last year.

Comparing the available bookings from March 2024 to March 2025, OAG looked at how many people have booked trans-border flights in the six-month period between April through September. It found that the number of tickets booked was down anywhere from 71% to 76%.

Total capacity available for passengers on flights between the two countries has also seen a reduction, likely a response to decreasing demands. The data shows that more than 320,000 seats have been removed by airlines operating between the two countries through to the end of October, with the highest cuts, 3.5%, also occurring during the peak summer months.

But the steep decline suggests that the current capacity cuts do not even begin to cover the current disinterest in traveling to the US.

The dramatic drop in bookings suggests that Canadian travelers are holding off on making reservations, probably due to ongoing uncertainty surrounding the tariff war. Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, called the latest round of Trump’s tariffs a “direct attack” on Canadian workers.

Though a decline in travel between Canada and the US was expected, the substantial 70% drop in bookings could require drastic changes for airlines, such as Air Canada, which is the airline that has the largest network of border crossings between the neighboring countries.

Beyond the trade dispute, some Canadians say they feel increasingly uneasy crossing into the US following several high-profile incidents of foreign visitors being detained by Ice.

Flight bookings between Canada and US down 70% amid Trump tariff war | Air transport | The Guardian

In other news, is the sky starting to fall?

Moody's says US fiscal strength on course for continued decline

26 March 2025

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Ratings agency Moody's said on Tuesday that the U.S.' fiscal strength is on track for a continued multi-year decline as budget deficits widen and debt becomes less affordable.

The agency said in a report that the country's fiscal health deteriorated further since Moody's lowered its outlook on the U.S. triple-A rating in November 2023.

The report comes amid heightened uncertainty in U.S. financial markets as President Donald Trump's decision to impose punitive tariffs on key trading partners has sparked investor fears of higher price pressures and a sharp economic slowdown.

"Even in a very positive and low probability economic and financial scenario, debt affordability remains materially weaker than for other Aaa-rated and highly rated sovereigns," Moody's said.

It projects debt to gross domestic product, a key ratio in assessing a country's finances, will rise to around 130% by 2035 from nearly 100% in 2025. Debt affordability will worsen at a faster rate, with interest payments accounting for 30% of revenue by 2035 from 9% in 2021, it said.

Moody's is the last among major ratings agencies to keep a top, triple-A rating for U.S. sovereign debt, though it lowered its outlook in late 2023 due to wider fiscal deficits and higher interest debt payments.

Fitch cut the U.S. sovereign rating by one notch to AA+ from AAA in 2023, citing fiscal deterioration and repeated down-the-wire debt ceiling negotiations that threaten the government’s ability to pay its bills. It was the second major rating agency to strip the United States of its top triple-A rating, after Standard & Poor's did so after the 2011 debt ceiling crisis.

Investors use credit ratings to assess the risk profile of companies and governments when they raise financing in debt capital markets. Generally, the lower a borrower's rating, the higher its financing costs.

Moody's said on Tuesday that lower U.S. debt affordability has meant that the central role of the dollar and the Treasury market in global financial markets has become more critical in supporting the triple-A rating.

However, the potential negative economic impact of tariffs as well as the prospect of unfunded tax cuts complicates the picture.

"We see diminished prospects that these strengths will continue to offset widening fiscal deficits and declining debt affordability," it said.

Republicans are pushing a $4.5 trillion tax cut extension, but its impact on deficits remains uncertain without major spending cuts, which could clash with Trump’s pledges to protect social programs.

Moody's said large spending cuts that require bipartisan support in Congress will be politically difficult to implement.

Other spending cuts, such as the ones spearheaded by the newly established Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk to reduce wasteful spending, are minor compared to mandatory expenditures and are unlikely to generate substantial savings in the short term.

Tariffs may offer temporary revenue support, but over time, persistently high tariffs are likely to hinder growth, counteracting their positive effect on revenues, it said.

Moody's says US fiscal strength on course for continued decline

Employers still nervous as £20bn tax rise ‘hangs over like a fog’, survey says

Friday 28 March 2025 6:00 am  

Employers remain pessimistic about hiring new staff as businesses “hoped for more” from the Spring Statement, according to the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC). 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves‘ Spring Statement saw multi-billion pound spending commitments on defence and construction as she vowed to “kickstart economic growth”. 

But a new survey of more than 700 UK employers suggests that businesses remain downbeat about taking on new staff. 

The survey was conducted before Reeves delivered her Spring Statement but a note from REC said: “Businesses hoped for more from this week’s Spring Statement to help them drive growth.”

The research showed a “very gentle trend of improvements” in business confidence but both measures taken – confidence in hiring and confidence in the UK economy – remained in the red. 

Medium-sized and larger employers were more optimistic than small businesses as confidence among firms with up to 50 employees barely changed, the survey said. 

REC’s last survey in January suggested that the rise in employers’ national insurance contributions had taken its toll on hiring intentions

Neil Carberry, REC’s chief executive, said that remained the case in their latest survey. 

“We have seen business sentiment begin to improve this Spring, though the impact of the national insurance hike hangs over this like a fog,” he said. 

The changes to employers’ national insurance contributions, which will come into effect from next week, will see firms pay an increase rate of 15 per cent of tax on earnings above a threshold of £5,000.

He urged Reeves to take action and introduce a raft of business-friendly policies to help the job market. 

“Too often, the government talks a good game but day-to-day action paints business as the problem rather than the solution,” he said. 

Carberry urged the Labour government to revise its flagship Employment flights Bill and make a “commitment to genuine partnership” that goes beyond setting up meetings. 

“British business wants this government to succeed – but they need to support us to help them do it.”

Employers in London are negative about hiring in the short and medium term, representing low expectations among City firms for substantial economic growth this year. 

“[Overall] optimism is tempered only a little by London, often a bellwether for the economy,” Carberry said.

Employers nervous as tax rise ‘hangs over like a fog’, survey says

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.        

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians,  inflation/recession now needs an entire section of its own.

Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act

The Tariff Act of 1930 (codified at 19 U.S.C. ch. 4), commonly known as the Smoot–Hawley Tariff or Hawley–Smoot Tariff,[1] was a law that implemented protectionist trade policies in the United States. Sponsored by Senator Reed Smoot and Representative Willis C. Hawley, it was signed by President Herbert Hoover on June 17, 1930. The act raised U.S. tariffs on more than 20,000 imported goods.[2]

Excluding duty-free imports, when enacted, the tariffs under the act were the second highest in United States history, exceeded by only the Tariff of 1828.[3] The act prompted retaliatory tariffs by many other countries.[4]

The act and tariffs imposed by U.S.'s trading partners in retaliation were major factors in the reduction of American exports and imports by 67% during the Great Depression.[5]

Economists and economic historians have agreed that the passage of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff worsened the effects of the Great Depression.[6]

The League of Nations held a World Economic Conference at Geneva in 1927 and its final report concluded that "the time has come to put an end to tariffs, and to move in the opposite direction". Vast debts and reparations from World War I could be repaid only through gold, services, or goods, but the only items available on that scale were goods.

Many of the governments represented by the delegates to the conference did the opposite, however, and in 1928, France was the first, passing a new tariff law and quota system.[7]

By the late 1920s, the U.S. economy had made exceptional gains in productivity because of electrification, which was a critical factor in mass production. Another contributing factor to economic growth was replacing horses and mules with motorcars, trucks, and tractors. One-sixth to one-quarter of farmland that had been devoted to feeding horses and mules, was freed up, contributing to a surplus in farm produce. Although nominal and real wages had increased, they did not keep up with the productivity gains.

Senator Smoot contended that raising the tariff on imports would alleviate the overproduction problem, but the market reality was that the United States had been running a trade account surplus, and although manufactured goods imports were rising, manufactured exports were rising even faster. Food exports had been falling and were in a trade account deficit, but the approximate values of food imports only amounted to half the value of manufactured imports.[8]

---- Smoot was a Republican from Utah and chairman of the Senate Finance CommitteeWillis C. Hawley, a Republican from Oregon, was chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means. During the 1928 United States presidential election, one of Herbert Hoover's campaign promises was to help beleaguered farmers by increasing tariffs on agricultural products. Hoover won, and Republicans maintained comfortable majorities in the House and the Senate during 1928. The House passed a version of the act in May 1929, increasing tariffs on agricultural and industrial goods alike. The House bill passed on a vote of 264 to 147, with 244 Republicans and 20 Democrats voting in favor of the bill.[10] The Senate debated its bill until March 1930, with many members trading votes based on industries in their states. The Senate bill passed on a vote of 44 to 42, with 39 Republicans and 5 Democrats voting in favor of the bill.[10] The conference committee then unified the two versions, largely by raising tariffs to the higher levels passed by the House.[11] The House passed the conference bill on a vote of 222 to 153, with the support of 208 Republicans and 14 Democrats.[10]

In May 1930, a petition was signed by 1,028 economists in the United States asking President Hoover to veto the legislation. The petition had been organized by Paul DouglasIrving Fisher, James T. F. G. Wood, Frank Graham, Ernest Patterson, Henry SeagerFrank Taussig, and Clair Wilcox.[12][13] Automobile executive Henry Ford also spent an evening at the White House trying to convince Hoover to veto the bill, calling it "an economic stupidity".[14] J. P. Morgan's Chief Executive Thomas W. Lamont said he "almost went down on [his] knees to beg Herbert Hoover to veto the asinine Hawley–Smoot tariff".[15]

While Hoover joined the economists in opposing the bill, calling it "vicious, extortionate, and obnoxious" because he felt it would undermine the commitment he had pledged to international cooperation, he eventually signed the bill after he yielded to influence from his own political party (Republican), his Cabinet (who had threatened to resign), and other business leaders.[16] After the bill had become law, in retaliation, Canada and other countries raised their own tariffs on U.S. goods.[17] Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke against the act during his successful campaign for president during 1932.[11]

More

Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act - Wikipedia

Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section.

Fire likely caused by dumped lithium battery

26 March 2025

A large blaze at a recycling centre was likely caused by a used lithium-ion battery, firefighters have said.

The fire affected 35 tonnes of waste at the Cordon's Farm site in Long Green Road, Braintree, on Monday.

Essex County Fire and Rescue Service watch manager Darren Hockley said residents must check with their local council how to dispose of lithium-ion batteries properly and "not in a skip or with domestic household waste".

Tom Cunningham, the Conservative cabinet member for environment at Braintree District Council, thanked firefighters for their "swift action".

"This incident serves as a reminder to us all of the importance of taking extra care when disposing of batteries," said Cunningham.

Braintree District Council has details on its website about how to dispose of electrical items, external.

Braintree recycling fire likely caused by lithium battery - BBC News

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

This weekend’s music diversion. Another long forgotten maestro. Approx. 11 minutes.

Johann Samuel Endler (1694-1762) - Sinfonia (in D) à 6 strumenti (1757)

Johann Samuel Endler (1694-1762) - Sinfonia (in D) à 6 strumenti (1757) - YouTube

This weekend’s history diversion. The fight to abolish slavery in the British Empire 1833. Approx. 52 minutes.

Why Did Britain Abolish Slavery in 1833? (Pt 2) | Watch

All crises have involved debt that, in one fashion or another, has become dangerously out of scale in relation to the underlying means of payment.

John Kenneth Galbraith