Monday, 23 February 2026

Now Real Tariff Wars Start? US Ends July 24. Iran Hit This Week?

Baltic Dry Index. 2043 -24     Brent Crude 70.88

Spot Gold  5175                        Spot Silver 86.85

US 2 Year Yield 3.48 +0.01

US Federal Debt. 38.721 trillion US GDP 31.179 trillion.

“If ignorance is bliss, then politicians must be the happiest people on earth.”

Anon.

An interesting trading week ahead. Trump’s new temporary tariffs start tomorrow, also the day President Trump gets to deliver his annual State of the Union address. Will he use his speech to rant and rail against SCOTUS whose nine members will be sitting in the gallery?

As he speaks will the US military be bombing Iran?

On Friday, Comex March silver first notice day arrives. Will Comex be forced to declare a silver force majeure cash settlement next month?

Stock futures fall amid uncertainty about Trump new tariffs: Live updates

Updated Mon, Feb 23 2026 9:26 PM EST

U.S. stock futures fell Sunday night after President Donald Trump said he’s raising his global tariffs to 15% from 10% after the Supreme Court struck down the president’s “reciprocal” tariffs. The new tariffs heightened market uncertainty about the outlook for inflation and ​global growth.

Dow Jones Industrial Average futures dropped 300 points, or 0.6%. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures slid 0.7% and nearly 1%, respectively.

Oil prices sank, with Brent ⁠crude ‌futures declining 0.7% to $71.26 a barrel. U.S. ‌crude futures were at $65.95 a barrel, down 0.8%.

Bitcoin also slumped, tumbling 5% to below $65,000 as the cryptocurrency’s sharp sell-off continued.

Those moves come after Trump on Saturday said he would increase global tariffs to 15%, up from the 10% he announced on Friday. Trump said the duties would go into effect immediately, though it was unclear whether any official documents had been signed regarding the timing.

“I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been ‘ripping’ the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” Trump wrote.

Trump also warned that additional levies would be coming over the next few months.

Wall Street is coming off a choppy trading session. On Friday, stocks initially rallied after the Supreme Court struck down a broad swath of Trump’s trade agenda, before pulling back and then ultimately recovering again.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the session higher by more than 230 points, 0.5%, recovering from a 200-point loss earlier in the session. The S&P 500 gained 0.7%, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.9%.

Investors hoped the Supreme Court ruling would soothe tensions between the U.S. and its trading partners and lead to possible refunds to companies affected by the tariffs, but are awaiting more clarity from the White House.

“It would seem that Wall Street — and Main Street — are going to be dealing with the issue of trade and tariffs for some time to come,” Tim Holland, chief investment officer of Orion Wealth Management, wrote on Friday.

Meanwhile, Iran remains a focal point for investors. This past week, Trump encouraged Iran to reach a deal over its nuclear program, warning that otherwise “bad things” might happen.

Trump is scheduled to deliver his State of the Union address to Congress on Tuesday.

Nvidia earnings will be a key focus this week. The chipmaking giant is set to release results on Wednesday. It’s one of only two Magnificent Seven stocks to have eked out a gain this year. The company will have to reassure investors that its artificial intelligence investment strategy remains intact.

On the economic front, durable goods orders and factory orders data are set to be released on Monday morning.

Stock market today: Live updates

South Korea’s Kospi hits fresh high as Asian markets brush off Trump’s latest tariff moves

Published Sun, Feb 22 2026 6:50 PM EST

Asia-Pacific markets rose Monday amid tariff uncertainty as U.S. President Donald Trump announced over the weekend that he would increase global tariffs to 15% from 10%.

The move came on the heels of a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down a broad swath of the president’s trade agenda enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, or IEEPA.

That said, U.S. trading partners are not off the hook, said Rystad Energy’s chief economist Claudio Galimberti.

“While the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidates a large share of existing tariffs and weakens the ability to target individual countries, it does not dismantle the broader tariff framework,” he wrote in a note following the announcement.

If the upper tariff limit is reached without prior IEEPA exemptions, the average rate could climb even higher than under the structure the Supreme Court just struck down, Galimberti added.

South Korea’s Kospi rose for a third straight session, jumping 1.7% to a fresh record high. Index heavyweights SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics rose over 3% and 2%, respectively.

The small-cap Kosdaq added 0.74%.

Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 added 0.17% in early trade.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index jumped over 2%.

Markets in China and Japan were closed for a holiday.

Bitcoin fell more than 3% to below $65,000 after U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to raise global tariffs to 15%.

“The move lower in bitcoin looks less like a crypto‑specific shock and more like a classic risk‑sentiment reset,” said Christopher Hamilton, head of client investment solutions, APAC ex-Japan.

“Bitcoin has become increasingly sensitive to global liquidity conditions.  When markets reprice growth, inflation or policy risks as we’re currently seeing with tariffs, bitcoin often acts as a high‑beta expression of risk rather than a defensive asset.”

Oil prices were last seen trading lower, erasing earlier gains. International benchmark Brent crude futures fell 0.6% to $71.33 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures were 0.78% lower at $65.96.

“The Supreme Court ruling is a setback ... but it is not an end to his policy agenda,” said Arthur Laffer, Jr., president of Laffer Tengler Investments.

Laffer said countries such as Vietnam and India that struck trade deals with the U.S. should think twice before backing away from those agreements, arguing that trade remains a central pillar of Trump’s political and economic strategy and that the president is likely to keep pressing the issue.

On Friday, U.S. stocks rose after the Supreme Court ruling, potentially providing relief for companies burdened by higher costs from the duties and easing concern about sticky inflation still plaguing the U.S. economy.

The S&P 500 advanced 0.69% and closed at 6,909.51, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.9% and settled at 22,886.07. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 230.81 points, or 0.47%, and ended at 49,625.97. The 30-stock index recovered from a 200-point loss earlier in the session on disappointing economic data.

Asia-Pacific markets: Hang Seng Index, Nifty 50, Kospi

In Trump tariff chaos news, exactly how does a 15 percent tariff for 150 days solve anything?  Trump’s new tariffs end on July 24, about 100 days out from the US mid-term elections.

Other than getting passed straight on to the US consumer, in effect a consumer tax; if any of the rest of the world bring in retaliatory tariffs, their tariffs aren’t limited to 150 days but could in theory be permanent.

If a US consumer can hold off buying a tariffed import for 151 days, why wouldn’t they just wait?

Given that Trump changed his mind and raised his 10 percent tariff to 15 percent in a matter of hours, what is the point of trying to negotiate anything with President Trump?

Trump to hike global tariffs to 15% from 10%, ‘effective immediately’

Published Sat, Feb 21 2026 11:23 AM EST  Updated Sat, Feb 21 2026 1:49 PM EST

President Donald Trump on Saturday said he would increase global tariffs to 15% from 10%, one day after the Supreme Court struck down a broad swath of the president’s trade agenda.

In a Truth Social post, Trump said the new tariffs will be “effective immediately.” He also warned that additional levies would follow.

“I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been “ripping” the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” he wrote.

“During the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally permissible Tariffs,” he added.

Trump’s announcement claimed that the new tariffs will take effect without delay, but it is unclear if any official documents have been signed detailing the timing. A White House fact sheet issued Friday said the original 10% tariffs would go into effect on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at 12:01 a.m. ET.

The White House did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for clarification.

Trump, who is scheduled to deliver his State of the Union address to Congress on Tuesday, was dealt a blow Friday when the Supreme Court decided in a 6-3 tariff ruling that the president wrongfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement his levies.

On Friday, Trump responded hours after the ruling with a 10% global tariff that he invoked under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The statute allows the president to impose temporary levies for 150 days. Any extension requires congressional approval.

The president was scathing in his remarks against the Supreme Court decision, calling the ruling “ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American” in a social media post.

He also attacked Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett after they voted with the majority in the ruling.

----On Friday, stocks rallied initially following the Supreme Court decision, before pulling back and then recovering again. Investors expect the ruling could allay tensions between the U.S. and its trading partners, and possibly refund affected companies and reduce inflation.

How the U.S. government will proceed with refunds remains a question. By one estimate, the U.S. government could owe more than $175 billion in refunds to importers following the Supreme Court decision.

Trump to hike global tariffs to 15% from 10%, 'effective immediately'

Australia examining ‘all options’ as Trump vows universal tariff hike

Australia has responded to US President Donald Trump’s latest tariff vow, with its trade chief saying “all options” are on the table.

Joseph Olbrycht-Palmer February 22, 2026 - 2:45PM

The country’s trade chief says Canberra is “working with our embassy in Washington to assess implications and examine all options” after Donald Trump vowed to hike his universal tariff to 15 per cent.

The US President’s pledge on Sunday (AEDT) came after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature trade policy.

“Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday, after MANY months of contemplation, by the United States Supreme Court, please let this statement serve to represent that I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries … to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” Mr Trump posted on social media.

At reporting, the new rate had not been officially implemented.

Australia had avoided the worst of Mr Trump’s tariffs, with its rate kept at 10 per cent – the lowest in the world.

But it was unclear whether Australian producers would be captured by the new hike if it were to manifest.

“Australia believes in free and fair trade,” Trade Minister Don Farrell said.

“We have consistently advocated against these unjustified tariffs.

More

Australia mulling examining ‘all options’ as Trump vows universal tariff hike | Sky News Australia

US businesses clamor for refunds after supreme court strikes down Trump’s tariffs

Refunds were not addressed by supreme court ruling, and they’ll likely play out in lower courts over extended period

Sat 21 Feb 2026 16.20 GMT

Top associations of American businesses are demanding to be repaid for Donald Trump’s tariffs following Friday’s supreme court ruling.

The US National Retail Federation, which represents a number of US retailers, from Walmart to small brands and manufacturers, called for “a seamless process to refund the tariffs to US importers”.

“The refunds will serve as an economic boost and allow companies to reinvest in their operations, their employees and their customers,” it said.

The US Chamber of Commerce, too, called for swift return of an estimated $133bn in collected tariffs covered by the ruling. Its chief policy officer, Neil Bradley, said: “Swift refunds of the impermissible tariffs will be meaningful for the more than 200,000 small business importers in this country and will help support stronger economic growth this year.

“We encourage the administration to use this opportunity to reset overall tariff policy in a manner that will lead to greater economic growth, larger wage gains for workers and lower costs for families,” he added.

The supreme court did not address the issue of whether the Trump administration would have to repay the tariffs it has collected since the US president upended the global economic order by slapping wildly varying levies on different countries apparently at a whim.

The court said Trump had exceeded his authority, but it also left lower courts to sort out the issue of repayments, which many observers say could be a mess, particularly given that Trump immediately attempted to reintroduce 10% tariffs on all countries via a different law after the ruling on Friday.

Dan Anthony, director of the business coalition We Pay the Tariffs, noted that the impact of the tariffs has been particularly hard on small businesses, which have taken out loans, delayed hiring and canceled expansion plans to accommodate import tariffs.

Refunds, he predicted, would allow businesses to reverse those trends.

The body published a national sign-on letter that said it was “imperative that that money is then given back without some of these onerous processes”.

“Full, fast automatic refunds is really where our focus is going to be,” it added.

“They’ve taken out loans just to keep their doors open. They’ve frozen hiring, canceled expansion plans, and watched their life savings drain away to pay tariff bills that weren’t in any budget or business plan,” the statement said. “But a legal victory is meaningless without actual relief for the businesses that paid these tariffs.”

The American Apparel and Footwear Association called on the Customs and Border Protection agency, which levies import duties, to “move quickly and provide clear guidance to American businesses on how to obtain refunds for tariffs that were unlawfully collected”.

But without a framework, and Trump’s apparently intention to impose tariffs by other legal means, refunds are likely not an immediate prospect.

At a testy news conference on Friday, Trump said it was “crazy” that the court justices had not addressed the issue of refunds. “It’s not discussed,” he said. “We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”

More

US businesses clamor for refunds after supreme court strikes down Trump’s tariffs | Trump tariffs | The Guardian

Consumer class action lawsuits anyone?

In other news, welcome to India.

Chaos, confusion and $200 billion dreams: What I saw at India’s AI summit

Published Sat, Feb 21 2026 3:50 AM EST

India hosted one of the world’s biggest AI events this week, but it was marred by chaos and confusion, apparently not the message it’s trying to send as it strives to become a leading artificial intelligence player.

Despite the drama, U.S. tech firms in particular couldn’t resist the temptation of the Indian market, talking up the country’s AI potential and making a number of announcements.

I have been on the ground in New Delhi since Monday and I can honestly say that the AI Impact Summit has been one of the most challenging reporting assignments of my career.

Traffic has been a nightmare more than usual in the Indian capital. There were times it didn’t move at all. On Wednesday, I had events and interviews at three different hotels and getting the team around to these appointments on time was a real challenge.

At one point on Thursday, were weren’t even sure if we’d be able to enter the Bharat Mandapam, the venue where the summit took place. That’s because instructions were not clear on when media would be allowed in on Thursday when Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the event.

We eventually found out we could enter at 6 a.m. local time. When we turned up, security did not let us in until later, not before a crowd of media had gathered at the gates. Inside, security were giving out conflicting instructions.

Several delegates expressed to me their frustrations over the organization of the summit.

The event itself was marred by other controversies. Bill Gates, who was named in the Epstein files, was scheduled to give a keynote address. There was then uncertainty if he would even turn up. The Gates Foundation had said earlier in the week that he would give the speech, but then on Thursday said the billionaire had pulled out.

Meanwhile, a university was reportedly kicked out of the summit for suggesting a robot dog they were showcasing was its own creation. A professor at Galgotias University told state-run broadcaster DD News that the robot, which was actually made by Chinese firm Unitree, was “developed” by the academic institution.

Online users called out the university, highlighting that the robot was made by a Chinese firm. The university denied claiming it had built the robot.

“We would like to clearly state that the robotic programming is part of our endeavor to make students learn AI programming and develop and deploy real-world skills using globally available tools and resources, given developing AI talent is [the] need of the hour,” the university said, according to media reports.

Indian IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw apologized on Tuesday for the “problems” on day one.

Then, there was the hand-holding moment that went viral between two AI giants. Modi had delegates on stage with everyone holding hands. But OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei didn’t do as they they’d been instructed, in a moment that instantly got scrutinized across social media. Altman later explained that he was “confused” and wasn’t sure what he should be doing.

Days earlier, Anthropic ran a Super Bowl ad taking digs at OpenAI’s decision to test advertisements in ChatGPT.

India’s lure

Despite all of these moments, the event pulled in a who’s who of tech names from Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai to Altman, all of whom talked up India’s advantages from a huge talent pool to a large consumer market.

“The excitement here, it’s just been incredible to watch,” Altman told me.

These tech firms used the week to make announcements and form partnerships around India.

OpenAI said it would be the first customer of Tata Consultancy Services’ data center business. Google announced partnerships with researchers and education institutions for its Gemini artificial intelligence feature.

More

Chaos and $200 billion dreams: What I saw at India’s AI summit

Tech giants commit billions to Indian AI as New Delhi pushes for superpower status

Published Sat, Feb 21 2026 2:30 AM EST

Tech giants have committed to funneling hundreds of billions of dollars into Indian AI efforts, against the backdrop of a major summit in the country that’s brought together world leaders and AI execs.

Record sums are being ploughed into AI as governments and companies across the globe race to roll out the technology. Hyperscalers — including the likes of AmazonMicrosoftMeta and Alphabet — announced capital expenditure that could hit $700 billion on AI this year.

The past week has seen Indian tech group Reliance reportedly announcing plans to invest $110 billion into data centers and other infrastructure, and compatriot Adani outlining a $100 billion AI data center buildout over the next decade.

There were also big announcements from U.S. tech firms.

Microsoft said at the Indian AI Impact Summit that it was on pace to invest $50 billion in AI in the Global South by the end of the decade. OpenAI and chipmaker AMD both announced partnerships with Tata Group to build AI capabilities, and U.S. asset manager Blackstone also said it had participated in a $600 million equity raise for Indian AI infrastructure Neysa.

More

Tech giants commit hundreds of billions of dollars to Indian AI

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians, inflation now needs an entire section of its own.

Walmart CFO warns of 'hiring recession' as GDP disappoints — is a 2026 recession coming?

February 20, 2026

Walmart WMT CFO John David Rainey doesn’t mince words, citing a “hiring recession,” rising student loan delinquencies and trade uncertainty as reasons for a cautious FY2027 outlook.

Despite Walmart beating on revenue and EPS, the stock is down nearly 9% over the last 5 days.

More unsettling details were buried in the CEO comments.

The majority of Walmart’s market share gains came from households earning over $100,000, while those below $50,000 are “managing spending paycheck to paycheck.”

When America’s discount retailer is being carried by its wealthiest shoppers, the broader consumer picture looks shakier than the headline numbers suggest.

The GDP Print

One day later, the Commerce Department confirmed the nerves were warranted.

Q4 2025 GDP came in at just 1.4% annualized, less than half the 2.9% Wall Street expected, and a cliff-drop from Q3’s 4.4% surge.

Overall, the economy grew 2.2% in 2025, the slowest annual pace since the pandemic.

Federal government spending collapsed 16.6% in the quarter, taking over a percentage point off the headline number.

The 43-day government shutdown takes most of the blame, and most economists expect a bounce in Q1.

But with Q4 already at 1.4%, just one quarter of negative growth would put the U.S. on the doorstep of a technical recession.

What Traders Are Pricing

Polymarket’s U.S. recession by end of 2026?” market is currently priced at 23%, up slightly from yesterday.

Polymarket traders are still relatively optimistic about Q1 2026 growth, with the chance of 1.5% growth or less priced at just 18%.

Despite the soft print, don’t expect the Fed to ride to the rescue. The March Polymarket gives a 94% chance of no change, meaning rate cuts remain firmly off the table for now.

Oxford Economics expects the shutdown drag to reverse in Q1.

If recession fears fade with it the massive capital expenditures required for AI infrastructure could face fewer macroeconomic headwinds.

That would reinforce the ‘soft landing’ narrative that’s been quietly underpinning AI-adjacent names, and stocks like Palantir Technologies PLTR and Nvidia NVDA, which have priced in a resilient macro environment, could get a tailwind.

Walmart CFO warns of 'hiring recession' as GDP disappoints — is a 2026 recession coming?

Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, among other things, I’ve added this section Updates as they get reported.

Graphene Manufacturing Group and Tickford Racing Unite to Push Performance Efficiency On and Off the Track

Fri, February 20, 2026 at 12:55 PM GM

Brisbane, Australia--(Newsfile Corp. - February 20, 2026) - Graphene Manufacturing Group Ltd. (TSXV: GMG) (OTCQX: GMGMF) ("GMG" or the "Company") is delighted to announce a new partnership with Tickford Racing, bringing together two high-performance organisations to celebrate a shared obsession: turning small, hard-earned gains into potentially big competitive advantages. As part of this partnership, Tickford Racing, one of Australia's leading Supercars teams, will trial GMG liquid graphene products including G® LUBRICANT and THERMAL-XR® as detailed below, display the GMG logo on its race cars, promote GMG on its website and in social media and host track/pit customer events.

This collaboration marks an exciting milestone for GMG as it showcases how graphene-enabled technologies can be explored in one of the most demanding and visible performance arenas in the world — top-tier Supercars racing. The partnership recognises motorsport as a stage where preparation, innovation and execution are publicly tested at pace, and where every marginal gain matters.

Tickford Racing and GMG will celebrate this shared performance mindset through a "test, learn and scale" approach — starting with targeted trials, capturing real-world performance data, and building credible proof points that have the potential to extend beyond the circuit into everyday industrial applications.

Graphene Manufacturing Group and Tickford Racing Unite to Push Performance Efficiency On and Off the Track

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”

Groucho Marx, attributed.

Saturday, 21 February 2026

Special Update 21/02/2026 A GDP Miss. Tariffs Illegal. The PCE Rises.

Baltic Dry Index. 2043 +24         Brent Crude 71.76

Spot Gold 5130                              Spot Silver 84.57

U S 2 Year Yield 3.48 +0. 01

US Federal Debt. 38.713 trillion 

US GDP 31.173  trillion

“I've heard that hard work never killed anyone, but I say why take the chance?”

Ronald Reagan

A US GDP miss. A rising US inflation number. The US Supremes declaring illegal most of President Trump’s tariffs!

The US stock casinos loved it, but I’m not so sure.

The US tort bar will love it though, filing class action after class action on behalf of US consumers who were charged, in whole or part, the illegal tariffs.

Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump's tariffs in a major blow to the president

The decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs but invalidates those implemented using an emergency law.

Feb. 20, 2026, 3:03 PM GMT / Updated Feb. 21, 2026, 4:12 AM GMT

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court delivered a major blow to President Donald Trump, ruling Friday that he exceeded his authority when imposing sweeping tariffs using a law reserved for a national emergency.

The justices, divided 6-3, held that Trump's aggressive approach to tariffs on products entering the United States from across the world was not permitted under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The ruling invalidates many, but not all, of Trump’s tariffs.

Speaking at the White House, Trump harshly criticized the Supreme Court majority, describing the decision as a "disgrace to our" nation and the justices in the majority as "very unpatriotic and disloyal to the Constitution," while suggesting they were "swayed by foreign interests."

Trump's ability to impose tariffs using other laws is not affected by the ruling, and Trump said he plans to use those authorities to impose new duties on a global basis.

On Friday evening, Trump said on social media that he signed a global 10% tariff, which would be a reduction for nearly all foreign nations. The White House outlined the new temporary tariff as being under Trump's authority in section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, and will begin Tuesday at 12:01 a.m. ET.

Despite Trump's rhetoric about the tariffs benefiting the economy, stocks rallied on news of the ruling.

The ruling was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by three liberal justices and two fellow conservatives, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority.

It is a rare setback for the administration at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, since Trump began his second term in January 2025.

Business owners who had to pay the tariffs and challenged them in court expressed relief at the ruling.

"These new tariffs were arbitrary, unpredictable, and bad business," Victor Schwartz, who runs New York-based wine and spirits importer VOS Selections, said in a statement.

"Thankfully, courts at every level recognized these duties for what they were: unconstitutional government overreach," he added.

The decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs, leaving in place ones he imposed on steel and aluminum using different laws, for example. But it upends his tariffs in two categories. One is country-by-country or “reciprocal” tariffs, which range from 34% for China to a 10% baseline for the rest of the world. The other is a 25% tariff Trump imposed on some goods from Canada, China and Mexico for what the administration said was their failure to curb the flow of fentanyl.

Companies that had to pay the tariffs may be able to seek a refund from the Treasury Department. Hundreds have already sued.

The court did not directly address that issue, but Kavanaugh, in dissent, said the effect on the U.S. Treasury could be significant.

"The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers," he wrote.

----We Pay the Tariffs, a group of small businesses that oppose Trump's tariffs, immediately called for a "full, fast and automatic" refund process.

"Small businesses cannot afford to wait months or years while bureaucratic delays play out, nor can they afford expensive litigation just to recover money that was unlawfully collected from them in the first place," Dan Anthony, the group's executive director, said in a statement.

The Constitution says the power to set tariffs is assigned to Congress. But Trump used IEEPA, which does not specifically mention tariffs but allows the president to “regulate” imports and exports when he deems there to be an emergency due to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to the nation.

Before Trump, no president had ever used that law to tariff imports. Lower courts ruled against the Trump administration in two related cases that were consolidated, with both sides asking the Supreme Court to issue a definitive ruling.

More

Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump's tariffs in a major blow to the president

S&P 500 rises, Dow gains 200 points after Supreme Court strikes down Trump emergency tariffs: Live updates

Updated Fri, Feb 20 2026 4:18 PM EST

Stocks rose on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s tariffs, potentially providing relief for companies burdened by higher costs from the duties and easing concern about sticky inflation still plaguing the U.S. economy.

The S&P 500 advanced 0.69% and closed at 6,909.51, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.9% and settled at 22,886.07. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 230.81 points, or 0.47%, and ended at 49,625.97. The 30-stock index recovered from a 200-point loss earlier in the session on disappointing economic data.

The Supreme Court struck down most of Trump’s sweeping tariff policy under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, with the majority ruling that that law “does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.” In response, Trump announced he will impose a new 10% “global tariff.”

“Now I’m going to go in a different direction, probably the direction that I should have gone the first time,” the president said during a press briefing at the White House after the high court’s decision. “I’ll go the way I could have gone originally, which is even stronger than our original choice.”

Shares of “Magnificent Seven” member Amazon — a company that sources up to 70% of its goods from China, per Wedbush Securities, and that has already begun to see tariffs impact the price of certain items — jumped more than 2% following the ruling. Others believed to benefit from the outcome were higher as well, such as Home Depot and Five Below.

“In the case of Amazon specifically, a lot of their stuff is imported from China, so tariffs are going to make the prices on Amazon go up for customers, and when prices go up, people buy fewer of those things,” said Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management. “No longer facing that problem is the source of excitement, I think.”

While the Supreme Court’s rebuke was largely expected by Wall Street, some questions remain, however, including whether tariffs that have been paid under the steeper rates will need to be given back. The Supreme Court ruling was silent on the matter.

“Now lower courts are going to have to figure out what’s going to happen to people who paid the tariffs and the government paying out big refunds,” said FBB Capital Partners senior research analyst and asset allocation strategist Michael Brenner. “If that’s out there, that would be effectively a form of economic stimulus.”

Earlier in the day, traders received a downbeat view on growth of the U.S. economy, as gross domestic product increased 1.4% for the fourth quarter. That was far below the 2.5% gain that economists polled by Dow Jones had anticipated. The 4.4% advance in the third quarter sharply surpassed estimates.

More

Stock market news for Feb. 20, 2026

Fourth-quarter U.S. GDP up just 1.4%, badly missing estimate

Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 8:31 AM EST

Economic growth cooled near the end of 2025 while inflation held firm, according to data released Friday that could complicate the Federal Reserve’s interest rate path.

Gross domestic produce rose at an annualized rate of just 1.4%, according to Commerce Department numbers released Friday. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for a 2.5% gain.

For the full year in 2025, the U.S. economy grew at a 2.2% pace, down from the 2.8% increase in 2024.

At the same time, inflation held firm in December, according to the gauge most closely watched by Fed officials.

The core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy, rose 3% in December, according to a separate release. That matched the consensus forecast but kept the pivotal inflation measure well above the Fed’s 2% target.

On a headline basis, the PCE index accelerated 2.9%, or 0.1 percentage point higher than expected.

Both indexes rose 0.4% for the month, compared to the respective forecasts for 0.3%.

Just prior to the data release, President Donald Trump warned that the GDP number would be soft, blaming it on the government shutdown that ended in November.

“The Democrat Shutdown cost the U.S.A. at least two points in GDP. That’s why they are doing it, in mini form, again. No Shutdowns!” Trump said in a Truth Social post. “Also, LOWER INTEREST RATES. “Two Late” Powell is the WORST!!!”

The latter part of the post was a reference to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who Trump has consistently hectored to lower interest rates. The Fed cut its benchmark rate by three-quarters of a percentage point in the latter part of 2025, but officials have since expressed a reluctance to lower further as they gauge the progress in bringing down inflation against threats of a labor market slowdown.

PCE inflation December 2025:

‘Canary in the coal mine’: Blue Owl liquidity curbs fuel fears about private credit bubble

Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 12:34 AM EST

The private credit boom is facing a new test after Blue Owl Capital permanently restricted withdrawals from one of its retail-focused debt funds.

Shares in Blue Owl Capital fell nearly 6% on Thursday after the private market and alternative assets manager sold $1.4 billion of loan assets held in three of its private debt funds.

The biggest portion of the sale came from a semi-liquid private credit fund marketed to U.S. retail investors called the Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, which will stop offering quarterly redemption options to investors, reigniting debate over whether stress was beginning to resurface in one of Wall Street’s fastest-growing corners.

“This is a canary in the coal mine,” Dan Rasmussen, founder and adviser at Verdad Capital told CNBC. “The private markets bubble is finally starting to burst.”

The broader concern is that years of ultra-low interest rates and thin yield spreads encouraged lenders to make riskier moves, financing smaller, more leveraged companies at yields that appeared attractive compared with public markets, market watchers said.

“Years of ultra-low rates and ultra-low spreads and very few bankruptcies led investors to go further and further out the risk spectrum in credit,” Rasmussen said. “This is a classic case of ‘fool’s yield,’ high yield that doesn’t translate into high returns because the borrowers were too risky.”

Private credit, which are generally direct loans made by non-bank lenders to companies, have ballooned into a roughly $3 trillion market globally.

Publicly traded business development companies, or BDCs, which are investment vehicles that lend to small and mid-sized private companies and are a major part of the private credit market, are increasingly funded by retail investors rather than institutions, according to Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. 

The Fuqua research, which was published last September, showed that institutional ownership of BDC shares has steadily declined over time, falling to about 25% on average by 2023.

“This trend indicates that retail investors are playing an increasingly large role in supplying equity capital to publicly traded BDC,” the researchers pointed out.

In 2025, the eight largest members of the S&P BDC Index offered dividend yields which can go up to 16%, with Blue Owl’s at over 11%. For comparison, the S&P Global’s U.S. high yield corporate bond index 1-year, 3-year and 5-year returns stand at around 7.7%, 9% and 4%, respectively.

“The majority of loans in private credit funds that individual investors tend to own, they’re high yield loans. They are, by their nature, somewhat risky,” said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott.

“Over the course of the cycle, you can anticipate some material defaults across these funds,” he added.

More

'Canary in the coal mine': Blue Owl liquidity curbs fuel fears private credit bubble

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians, inflation now needs an entire section of its own.

Fed’s Preferred Gauge Shows Accelerating December Inflation Trends

The personal-consumption expenditures price index increased by 0.4% in December

Feb. 20, 2026 9:01 am ET

Key inflation metrics tracked by the Federal Reserve accelerated at the end of last year, underscoring why many Fed officials have turned cautious about supporting further interest-rate cuts.

The personal-consumption expenditures price index increased by 0.4% in December, after rising by 0.2% in November, the Commerce Department said Friday.

That lifted the 12-month PCE inflation rate to 2.9%, up from 2.8% in November. Core PCE inflation—which excludes volatile food and energy prices—ticked up to 3% in the 12 months through December, from 2.8% a month earlier.

The numbers are roughly aligned with forecasts from analysts, who can use other inflation metrics to forecast PCE inflation with great accuracy. The report also is more lagged than usual, because last fall’s government shutdown has caused cascading delays in the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s publication calendar.

But the figures point to one reason many Fed officials have turned hesitant about easing their policy stance further despite January’s decline in the consumer-price index, now at 2.4%. PCE inflation, not the CPI, is the metric against which the Fed gauges progress toward its 2% inflation target, and it has consistently hovered above that target for most of half a decade.

Much of the time, PCE inflation tends to run cooler than CPI inflation, but for now, the pattern has reversed. That is in large part because housing inflation, which has cooled steadily, plays a bigger part in the CPI calculation than in the PCE calculation, UBS economist Alan Detmeister has observed.

Minutes from the Fed’s January meeting published Wednesday showed that a contingent of Fed officials thinks that at 3.5% to 3.75%, the Fed’s current rate target is near a neutral level that is no longer working to restrain economic growth and rising prices. At last month’s Fed meeting, the minutes showed, one set of officials urged the group to consider communicating that going forward, rate increases may be as much a possibility as further cuts.

More

PCE Inflation Rose in December, Fueling Federal Reserve Rate Caution - WSJ

The Multipolar Delusion

And the Unilateral Temptation

C. Raja Mohan  March/April 2026 Published on February 17, 2026

From Washington to Beijing and Moscow to New Delhi, a consensus is emerging that the world has entered a multipolar era. Political leaders, diplomats, and analysts routinely declare that unrivaled American dominance has ended and global power is now dispersed across multiple centers. The assertion has become so commonplace that it is often treated as a self-evident fact rather than a proposition to be examined. Even officials in the United States, long the principal beneficiary of the unipolar post–Cold War order, have adopted this language. At the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, Secretary of State Marco Rubio observed that Washington’s moment as the sole superpower was historically “not normal” and that the international system would inevitably tend toward multipolarity. Rubio’s statement appeared to echo the growing belief in China, Russia, and much of the developing world that the United States’ power is declining and its long-standing global primacy is unsustainable.

This seeming convergence obscures a difference in how the various players define “multipolarity.” For the Trump administration, acknowledging multipolarity doesn’t mean accepting limits on American power. Instead, it serves as a justification for abandoning the traditional U.S. conception of global leadership and the responsibilities that come with it. The idea of multipolarity allows Washington to pursue a narrower, more transactional foreign policy—one focused on extracting advantage rather than underwriting order, unconcerned with the maintenance of institutions or norms that do not serve immediate American interests. For China, Russia, and many developing countries, by contrast, multipolarity is not merely descriptive but aspirational. It is a political project aimed at constraining American dominance, eroding Western-led institutions, and constructing alternative models of governance, development, and security in which the United States is not the only country in charge.

The idea of multipolarity has been popular since the United States emerged as the sole dominant power at the end of the Cold War. After the 1990–91 Gulf War, which revealed the scale of American military superiority, French leaders warned of the dangers posed by the American “hyperpower.” China and Russia later transformed this critique into a strategy, seeking to organize resistance to U.S. primacy. They established what they declared to be a “strategic partnership” in the late 1990s and formed the multilateral BRICS alliance along with Brazil, India, and South Africa to coordinate among non-Western powers. They believed that such efforts could accelerate the transition away from American hegemony.

Trump’s return to office made the arrival of a multipolar moment seem inevitable. The United States was internally divided, economically unsettled, and weary of global commitments. China’s economy had grown to nearly the same size as that of the European Union, and the country had become a formidable technological leader in its own right. Russia’s war in Ukraine had demonstrated Moscow’s willingness to use force to revise borders in Europe. And BRICS had expanded to include new members in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, reinforcing the impression of a rising alternative system to counter American dominance. Many observers concluded that the multipolar world had arrived and that American unipolarity was living on borrowed time.

A year later, however, this conviction appears misplaced. The Trump administration has embarked on a forceful reassertion of American power by imposing onerous tariffs, intervening in other countries, and brokering peace negotiations and commercial dealmaking across the world. China and Russia have resisted Washington on select issues, but they have been unable to mount a comprehensive challenge to the United States’ effort to restructure global rules. Washington’s European allies have proved even less able to stand up to the United States. Facing Trump’s insults and pressure, they have wilted and caved.

The reality is that the world is still unipolar.

More

The Multipolar Delusion | Foreign Affairs

Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section.

This weekend, something different. With all of the UK’s and Europe’s great rains this autumn and winter, it’s nothing new. No man-made global warming, whatever lies the BBC spreads.

The Great Flood and Great Famine of 1314

Published: 24th March 2015

During the winter and spring of 2013/2014, Britain suffered a prolonged period of destructive winter storms, resulting in widespread flooding and damage. However this was not the first time that the country had been devastated by heavy periods of rain and bad weather.

It rained almost constantly throughout the summer and autumn of 1314 and then through most of 1315 and 1316. Crops rotted in the ground, harvests failed and livestock drowned or starved. Food stocks depleted and the price of food soared. The result was the Great Famine, which over the next few years is thought to have claimed over 5% of the British population. It was the same or even worse in mainland Europe.

The shortage of crops pushed up prices of everyday necessities such as vegetables, wheat, barley and oats. Bread was therefore also expensive and because the grain had to be dried before it could be used, of very poor quality. Salt, the only way at that time to cure and preserve meat, was difficult to obtain because it was much harder to extract through evaporation in wet weather; its price rose dramatically.

In the spring of 1315 Edward II decreed that the price of basic foodstuffs be limited. This did not however do much to mitigate the crisis: the traders simply refused to sell their goods at these low prices. In the end the act was abolished at the Lincoln parliament in 1316.

The situation got worse and worse as the rain continued to fall. It was reported that there was even no bread in St Albans for the king and his court when they stopped off there on 10th – 12th August 1315.

Things were particularly bad in the north of England and especially in Northumbria, where the people were already struggling due to looting by Scottish raiders. The population here resorted to eating dogs and horses.

Everyone was affected, from nobles to peasants. Things got so bad in the winter of 1315/1316 that the peasants ate the seed grain they had stored for planting in the spring.

By 1316 there were even rumours of cannibalism. In their misery and starvation, many people begged, stole and murdered for what little food they could find. Even law-abiding people resorted to criminality in order to feed themselves.

Parents who could no longer feed their families abandoned their children to fend for themselves. Indeed, the fairytale of Hansel and Gretel may have originated at this time. In the story, Hansel and Gretel have been abandoned in the woods by their parents during a time of famine. They are taken in by an old woman living in a cottage. The old woman starts to heat the oven, and the children realise she is planning to roast and eat them. Gretel manages to trick the old woman into opening the oven, and then pushes her in.

As the cold, wet weather continued, the famine reached its height in spring 1317. Finally in the summer of that year the weather patterns returned to normal, but it was 1322 before the food supply recovered completely.

So what caused year after year of severe winters and cold, rainy summers? The onset of the Great Famine coincided with the end of the Medieval Warm Period and the beginning of a Little Ice Age. The European climate was changing, with cooler and wetter summers and earlier autumn storms. These were far from ideal conditions for agriculture and with a large population to feed, it only took one failed harvest for things to get very bad very quickly.

Some historians think that this terrible weather may have been caused by a volcanic eruption, perhaps that of Mount Tarawera in New Zealand which is known to have erupted around 1314.

Unfortunately the Great Famine was only the first of a series of severe crises to hit Europe in the 14th century; the Black Death was just around the corner…

The Great Flood and Great Famine of 1314

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

Exponent Calculator

Enter values into any two of the input fields to solve for the third.

Exponent Calculator

This weekend’s music diversion. Another long forgotten composer. Approx. 16 minutes.

Jan Křtitel Jiří Neruda (c.1711-1776) - Concerto per il Clarino (1772)

Jan Křtitel Jiří Neruda (c.1711-1776) - Concerto per il Clarino (1772)

Next, when Citibank architecture had a problem. Approx. 33 minutes.

How a student’s question exposed a fatal flaw in a New York skyscraper

How a student’s question exposed a fatal flaw in a New York skyscraper | Watch

Finally, the castles of Wales. Approx. 8 minutes.

Top 10 Castles in Wales | Snowdonia, Anglesey, Cardiff & More

Top 10 Castles in Wales | Snowdonia, Anglesey, Cardiff & More - YouTube

“I have left orders to be awakened at any time during national emergency, even if I'm in a cabinet meeting.”

Ronald Reagan