Saturday, 31 May 2025

Special Update 31/05/2025 Core PCE Tame. Frontrunning Tariffs.

Baltic Dry Index. 1418 +65              Brent Crude 62.78

Spot Gold 3289                   U S 2 Year Yield 3.89 -0.03

US Federal Debt. 36.917 trillion US GDP 30.040 trillion

You don't have to believe in Feng Shui for it to work. I just know it brings me money.

Donald Trump

Predictably, on the last trading day of May, the US stock casinos dressed up stocks, somewhat. By previous month-end standards, this was a miss.

The Fed’s favourite inflation indicator, core PCE came in tame too, although from here on out a tariff inflation effect is likely to start showing up.

But while tariff uncertainty rules for now, President Trump seems determined to blow up the US economy by raising steel tariffs from 25 percent to 50 percent, wrecking the domestic auto industry.

Even worse, President Trump is about to weaponise the US Treasury market, cutting it off from most global potential buyers.

An increasingly dismal US and global economy seems to lie directly ahead.

S&P 500 is flat to close out a 6% May gain as investors continue to look past trade policy confusion

Updated Fri, May 30 2025 4:24 PM EDT

The S&P 500 was little changed on Friday to close out a big winning month, as investors shook off trade war fears after President Donald Trump said China violated its preliminary trade agreement.

The broad index inched down by 0.01% to end at 5,911.69. The Nasdaq Composite slid 0.32% to 19,113.77, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 54.34 points, or 0.13%, to finish at 42,270.07.

Friday’s trading session marked the end of a strong May trading month, with a chunk of the rally following a trade deal announcement between the U.S. and UK. Investors hoped that could pave the way for more agreements with other countries facing duties.

The S&P 500 added 6.2% this month, while the Nasdaq surged 9.6% in that time. Both notched their best months since November 2023. The 30-stock Dow has gained 3.9% on the month.

For the week, the S&P 500 jumped 1.9%, while the 30-stock Dow rose 1.6%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq advanced 2%.

Stocks initially tumbled in Friday’s session after Trump said in a social media post that China “violated” its current trade agreement with the U.S. Later in the trading day, a Bloomberg report, citing people familiar, said the administration plans to broaden restrictions on China’s tech sector.

That came after Treasury Secretary Bessent said in a Fox News interview that U.S.-China trade talks “are a bit stalled.” Investors are now wondering if, or when, a long-term agreement between China and the U.S. can be reached.

The administration has found its contentious plan for broad and steep levies in legal limbo. Legal concerns hit a boiling point after the Court of International Trade on Wednesday night halted the majority of Trump’s tariffs.

However, an appeals court granted a stay on Thursday afternoon, allowing the duties to remain in place until next week. The Trump administration considered using a provision of the Trade Act of 1974 to implement tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The legal battle around tariffs offers the latest dose of uncertainty for what was already an uneasy market. Investors have contended with macroeconomic concerns tied to tariffs and worry that the shakeup to U.S. trade policy could cause a recession.

“It’s an awkward time,” said Jay Hatfield, CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management. “If you’re an investor, you want to bet on good earnings, not good tweets about tariffs.”

Stock market today:

Trump says U.S. will double steel tariffs to 50%

Published Fri, May 30 2025 12:45 PM EDT

President Donald Trump told U.S. steelworkers on Friday that he will double tariffs on steel imports to 50%.

“We’re going to bring it from 25% to 50%, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America,” Trump said during remarks at U.S. Steel’s Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. The president said the steep tariffs would “further secure the steel industry.”

“At 25%, they can sort of get over that fence,” Trump said. “At 50%, they can no longer get over the fence.”

The new import duties will start June 4, the president posted on Truth Social.

Trump was delivering remarks at U.S. Steel after indicating last week that he will clear a controversial merger with Japan’s Nippon. Investors and union members were listening for answers from the president on what structure the deal will take, though he delivered little in the way of additional detail.

Trump said Nippon has committed to keep U.S. Steel’s blast furnaces operating at full capacity for a minimum of a decade. There will be no layoffs and “no outsourcing whatsoever” due to the deal, the president said. U.S. Steel workers will receive a $5,000 bonus, he added.

Trump has avoided calling the deal a merger, describing it instead as a “partnership” in a May 23 post on his social media platform Truth Social. The president said U.S. Steel’s headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh and Nippon would invest $14 billion over 14 months in the more than 120-year-old American industrial icon.

U.S. Steel has called the deal as a “merger” in which it will become a “wholly owned subsidiary” of Nippon Steel North America but continue to operate as separate company, according to an April 8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

More

Trump says U.S. will double steel tariffs to 50%

U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street

Published Fri, May 30 2025 5:01 AM EDT Updated Fri, May 30 2025 9:17 AM EDT

While U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs play out in U.S. courts, another one of his proposed laws could weaponize the American tax system.

Investment banks and law firms warn this step could prove to be as significant as the impact of duties on investors.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which passed through the U.S. House of Representatives last week, includes the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades under a provision known as Section 899. The bill must still gain the Senate’s approval.

“We see this legislation as creating the scope for the US administration to transform a trade war into a capital war if it so wishes,” said George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank on Thursday.

“Section 899 challenges the open nature of US capital markets by explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals,” Saravelos added in the note to clients, under the subtitle “weaponization of US capital markets in to law.”

Section 899 says it will hit entities from “discriminatory foreign countries” — those that impose levies such as the digital services taxes that disproportionately affect U.S. companies.

France, for instance, has a 3% tax on revenues from online platforms, which primarily targets big technology firms such as GoogleAmazonFacebook, and Apple. Germany is reportedly considering a similar tax of 10%.

What does the proposed tax do?

Under the new tax bill, the U.S. would hit investors from such countries by increasing taxes on U.S. income by 5 percentage points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%.

Emmanuel Cau, head of European Equity Strategy at Barclays, suggested that the mere passage of the tax legislation could make dollar assets less valuable for foreign investors.

“In our view, this is a risk for those companies generating US revenues, and domiciled in countries that have enacted Digital Services Taxes (DST) or are implementing the OECD’s Under Taxed Payment Rule (UTPR),” Cau said in a Friday note to clients.

He highlighted companies such as London-listed Compass Group, which provides catering services to U.S. schools, and InterContinental Hotels, which owns at least 25 luxury hotels in the U.S., are likely to be affected by the proposed law.

“Given US net international investment position is sharply negative, there is indeed scope for capital outflows if indeed S899 passes through the Senate in its current form,” he added.

The impact of the bill won’t be limited to European companies or individuals from those states.

The bill “could significantly increase tax rates applicable to certain non-U.S. individuals and business, governmental, and other entities,” said Max Levine, head of U.S. tax at the law firm Linklaters.

This means it could also ensnare governments and central banks, which are large investors of U.S. Treasuries. France and Germany, for instance, held a combined $475 billion worth of U.S. government bonds as of March.

The proposed tax would lower returns on U.S. Treasuries for those investors as “the de facto yield on US Treasuries would drop by nearly 100bps,” Deutsche Bank’s Saravelos added. “The adverse impact on demand for USTs and funding the US twin deficit at a time when this is most needed is clear”.

“It’s very bad,” said Beat Wittmann, chairman of Switzerland-based Porta Advisors. “This is huge — this is just one piece in the overall plan and it’s completely consistent with what this administration is all about.”

“The ultimate judge for this is not our opinions, it’s the bond market,” Wittmann added. “The U.S. bond market is discounting these developments, and we have seen in the last few weeks, that if there was a safe haven move, investors clearly prefer German bunds.”

More

U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street

In other news.

CNBC Daily Open: Definite tariffs could be better for markets than on-and-off ones

Published Thu, May 29 2025 9:05 PM EDT

A U.S. federal trade court striking down President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs on a broad swathe of countries seems, on the surface, a positive development all around. A lack of tariffs leads to cheaper goods, likely more consumer spending and higher corporate revenue, which tends to flow back to stock prices.

This ideal scenario, however, rests on the assumption that the court’s decision is final and the Trump administration does not have other ways of reinstating its muscular trade policies.

Events on Thursday have already shown us that is not the case. An appeals court temporarily paused the tariff ruling to allow the Trump administration to respond to the case. “Even if we lose, we will do it another way,” Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro told reporters at the White House Thursday afternoon.

This uncertainty could roil markets and trade negotiations with countries further. If tariffs could pop in and out of existence based on policy and judicial decisions, how do nations discuss trade deals, and how do investors allocate their capital efficiently? Indeed, the S&P 500 was up nearly 0.9% when trading began, but fell sharply after the Trump administration said it may ask the Supreme Court to halt the federal trade court’s ruling.

“In general, markets don’t like uncertainty, because it makes forecasting more difficult,” said Larry Tentarelli, founder of the Blue Chip Daily Trend Report. “We expect the tariff news cycle to be an extended process, which can lead to higher short-term volatility.”

In other words, if there was a definite universal tariff of 10% — while it’s undeniably still a tax — the surety of it could be better for markets and economies globally in the long run.

CNBC Daily Open: Markets would prefer definite tariffs

Multiple Countries Issue Travel Warnings for USA After Immigration Crackdowns Target Foreign Visitors

30 May 2025

Germany Warns Citizens After Border Detentions

Something shocking is happening at America's borders that's making headlines across Europe. Germany's Foreign Office adjusted its travel advisory after several of its citizens were reportedly arrested and detained by immigration authorities while entering the U.S., according to local media reports.

A German official on Saturday told NPR the country's consulates general are aware of cases of citizens being detained and are in contact with their families as well as U.S. officials.

The warning followed reports of three German nationals who were detained at the U.S. border and deported, according to Reuters.

The German government's response sends a clear message that even traditionally friendly allies aren't taking any chances with America's new immigration stance. A message on Germany's foreign office website notes that, "Neither a valid ESTA authorization nor a valid U.S. visa constitutes a right to entry into the USA. The final decision regarding entry is made by the U.S. border official. It is recommended that you bring proof of your return journey (e.g., flight booking) upon entry.

There is no legal recourse against this decision. German diplomatic missions abroad are unable to influence the reversal of a denial of entry." This stark warning represents a dramatic shift in how Germany views travel to its longtime ally.

United Kingdom Issues Stern Entry Warnings

The United Kingdom is also warning its residents to comply with all entry rules or they "may be liable to arrest or detention." The move comes after a tourist from the U.K. was reportedly arrested and detained by ICE at the U.S.-Canada border earlier this month.

The U.K.'s foreign office also updated its advice for its citizens traveling to the U.S. The warning says that, "Travelers should only enter the United States with a valid ESTA or visa that corresponds to the intended purpose of their stay.

Criminal records in the United States, false information about the purpose of their stay, or even a slight overstay of their visa upon entry or exit can lead to arrest, detention, and deportation."

British authorities are leaving nothing to chance, making it crystal clear that the consequences of any misstep could be severe. On Mar. 20, the U.K.
updated its advice on travel to the United States, noting harsh consequences may come to those who violate immigration laws. "The authorities in the U.S. set and enforce entry rules strictly," the office said. "You may be liable to arrest or detention if you break the rules." The language is unusually direct for diplomatic communications, reflecting the gravity of the situation.

----Netherlands and Belgium Join the Warning Wave

The Netherlands and Belgium are the latest two European countries moving to update their travel advice for the United States for LGBTQ+ citizens and all people traveling to the U.S. The Dutch foreign ministry has warned that U.S.

customs and laws regarding sexual minorities may differ from those in the Netherlands. Belgium is also set to update its advice soon due to "tightened border controls" and new challenges for LGBTQ+ people, according to reports.

Similarly, the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs updated its guidance on Tuesday stating that Dutch citizens must also include their gender at birth on their ESTA and visa applications. While no citizens from the Netherlands are known to have been turned away at the US border, the country put out an advisory that "you must indicate your gender at birth when applying for an ESTA or a visa" to the United States.

These advisories represent a coordinated European response to protect their citizens from potential complications at U.S. borders.

The timing suggests governments are responding to specific incidents and policy changes that have created uncertainty for travelers.

More

Multiple Countries Issue Travel Warnings for USA After Immigration Crackdowns Target Foreign Visitors

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.        

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians,  inflation/recession now needs an entire section of its own.

US inflation gauge cools with little sign of tariff impact, so far

May 30, 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — A key U.S. inflation gauge slowed last month as President Donald Trump’s tariffs have yet to noticeably push up prices. Spending by Americans slowed despite rising incomes, potentially an early reaction to higher prices on some imported goods.

Friday’s report from the Commerce Department showed that consumer prices rose just 2.1% in April compared with a year earlier, down from 2.3% in March and the lowest since September. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices rose 2.5% from a year earlier, below the March figure of 2.7%, and the lowest in more than four years. Economists track core prices because they typically provide a better read on where inflation is headed.

The figures show inflation is still declining from its post-pandemic spike, which reached the highest level in four decades in July 2022. Economists and some business executives have warned that prices will likely head higher as Trump’s widespread tariffs take effect, though the timing and impact of those duties are now in doubt after they were struck down late Wednesday in court.

On a monthly basis, overall prices and core prices both increased just 0.1% from March to April. The cost of big-ticket manufactured goods rose a hefty 0.5%, though that increase was offset by a 0.1 decline in other goods, such as groceries. The cost of services rose just 0.1% from March to April.

The big increase in durable goods prices could reflect the early impact of tariffs. Americans also cut back their spending on longer-lasting factory goods in April, the report showed.

Overall consumer spending — which includes spending on services — rose 0.2% in April from March, the report said, but that’s down from a big 0.7% rise in March.

The slowdown in spending could reflect some early caution on the part of consumers, economists said, in response to higher goods prices. It also suggests that some of the spending jump in March reflected consumers purchasing items like cars to get in front of the impact of tariffs.

“The pulling forward of consumer spending ahead of the tariff increases will continue to dampen household spending in the coming months, especially as they face higher prices and a softening labor market,” Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide, said in an email. “We anticipate that the improved inflation trend will reverse in the second half of the year as companies are forced to begin passing along a portion of the increased tariffs in order to protect profit margins.”

More

US inflation gauge cools with little sign of tariff impact, so far | AP News

US Economy Shrinks 0.2% on Weaker Spending, Larger Trade Impact

May 29, 2025

(Bloomberg) -- The US economy shrank at the start of the year, restrained by weaker consumer spending and an even bigger impact from trade than initially reported.

Gross domestic product decreased at a 0.2% annualized pace in the first quarter, the second estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed Thursday. That compared with an initially reported 0.3% decline.

The economy’s primary growth engine — consumer spending — advanced 1.2%, down from an initial estimate of 1.8% and the weakest pace in almost two years. Meantime, net exports subtracted nearly 5 percentage points from the GDP calculation, slightly more than the first projection and the largest on record.

The slight upward revision in GDP reflected stronger business investment and a greater accumulation of inventories. Federal government spending wasn’t as much of a drag as originally reported.

GDP figures are revised multiple times as more data become available, enabling the government to fine-tune its estimate. The first projection, released in late April, showed the economy contracted for the first time since 2022. The final estimate is due next month.

Economic growth was dragged down at the start of the year by a surge in imports as US businesses tried to get ahead of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. More moderate consumer spending, as well as a decline in federal government spending, also weighed on the figure.

Since then, the White House has walked back or delayed some of the more punitive levies, and most of the tariffs have been blocked by a US trade court. While the pauses have helped calm Americans’ concerns about the economy and prompted many economists to scrap their recession calls, tariff rates are still substantially higher than before Trump took office. 

Forecasters largely expect GDP to rebound in the second quarter as higher duties discourage imports, and the goods already brought in will accumulate in larger inventories that add to growth. Beyond that, economists and policymakers will be paying close attention to how Trump’s policies — including trade, but also immigration and taxation — will impact consumer and business spending going forward.

Thursday’s data showed underlying demand across the economy was weaker than initially thought in the first quarter. Final sales to private domestic purchasers — a measure favored by economists that combines consumer spending and business investment — rose at a 2.5% rate, the slowest in nearly two years.

Consumer spending was revised lower largely on weaker demand for cars. Outlays for services, including health care and insurance, were also lower. 

Trump contends his trade policies will stoke economic growth over the longer term through the revival of domestic manufacturing, which he says will boost employment and lower the prices of US-made goods.

GDI Estimate

The government’s other main gauge of economic activity — gross domestic income — fell 0.2%, after a 5.2% annualized advance in the fourth quarter. That was the first decline since the end of 2022. Whereas GDP measures spending on goods and services, GDI measures income generated and costs incurred from producing those same goods and services.

The GDI data include figures on corporate profits. The 2.9% decrease in profits — the most since 2020 — followed a 5.4% advance in the fourth quarter.

While recent data have suggested businesses are mostly taking the hit so far, many firms — including Walmart Inc., the world’s largest retailer — are warning that consumers will start seeing price hikes soon.

More

US Economy Shrinks 0.2% on Weaker Spending, Larger Trade Impact

Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section.

Chinese hold on solar-power tech raises fresh sabotage fears in Europe

May 29, 2025, 01:12 PM

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Hidden components in Chinese-made solar power equipment have caused alarm bells in Western capitals amid concerns over Beijing’s ability to interfere with power grids. Europe may be particularly vulnerable, experts say, with most of its solar farms potentially at risk of remote shutdown.

The revelation of undeclared remote access devices in American solar farms, first reported by Reuters earlier this month, came less than a month after a power outage that shut down electricity for millions throughout Spain, Portugal, Andorra and parts of France, highlighting the possible fragility of even highly developed and integrated European power grids.

According to unnamed sources cited by Reuters, the communication devices that were embedded in solar farm gear were not shown on schematics and customer information of the products, suggesting they may have been deliberately concealed. The undisclosed devices were reportedly found during a routine disassembly of Chinese-made power inverters, which serve to connect solar farms to the electricity grid, control the flow of power and maintain the all-important grid frequency.

While Iberian authorities have ruled out a cyber attack in the case of the peninsula’s massive blackout, the finding has nonetheless instilled a new sense of urgency in European planning to make the continent’s integrated electrical grid safe and resilient.

Market dominance

Inverters are crucial in linking photovoltaic (PV) power plants, which output DC electricity, to the broader electricity network, which runs on AC. In 2023, 78% of all inverters installed in Europe came from Chinese vendors, with the overwhelming majority being made by Huawei and SunGrow, according to DNV, a risk consultancy. The report was commissioned by SolarPower Europe, an industry advocacy group.

This market dominance can likely be explained by a combination of China’s large manufacturing capacity and the comparatively lower prices of Chinese inverters compared to European ones.

Control over the inverters allows outsiders to simultaneously disconnect generating capacity from the grid, which can cause blackouts. It would also allow them to manipulate voltage and frequency settings to destabilize local grids and to override safety protections like anti-islanding systems.

Both Huawei and Sungrow have documented links to the Chinese government and the country’s ruling Communist Party, including formal ties, participation in government projects, and officials holding high-ranking positions simultaneously in both the companies and the state.

Under Chinese law, Huawei faces mandatory cooperation requirements with intelligence services. The 2017 National Intelligence Law declares that Chinese companies must “support, assist, and cooperate with” China’s intelligence-gathering authorities. As a result of questions over its independence and safety, the electronics giant has already faced restrictions on work on critical communications infrastructure – especially 5G networks – in several countries. It is also front and center in a major investigation currently ongoing in Brussels surrounding bribery of European officials.

----“Europe’s energy sovereignty is at serious risk due to the unregulated and remote control capabilities of photovoltaic inverters from high-risk, non-European manufacturers – most notably from China,” said the European Solar Manufacturing Council, an industry association.

This isn’t purely hypothetical, either. In November 2024, some solar inverters in the U.S., U.K. and Pakistan were actually disabled remotely from China. Very little was publicly revealed about this incident and its consequences; investigations later showed that the shutdown may have been the result of an industry dispute, according to Günter Born, a German tech and cybersecurity journalist.

More

Chinese hold on solar-power tech raises fresh sabotage fears in Europe

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

This weekend’s music diversion. 10 minutes of harpsicord genius. Well, the first 10 minutes, anyway.  Approx. 20 minutes.

Antoine-Frédéric Gresnick (1755-1799) - Concerto per il Cembalo (1782)

Antoine-Frédéric Gresnick (1755-1799) - Concerto per il Cembalo (1782)

This weekend’s tariff and shipping diversion. Approx. 12 minutes.

Canada Ditches the U.S. in $40B Deal—Europe Wins Big, Washington Stunned

Canada Ditches the U.S. in $40B Deal—Europe Wins Big, Washington Stunned - YouTube

Finally, IMF Portwatch a partnership with Oxford University, global trade monitor. 

Trade Monitor | PortWatch

Winning is important, but survival is even more important. If you don't survive, you don't get to fight the next battle.

Donald Trump


Friday, 30 May 2025

Tariff Chaos. Trump Tariffs Via The Backdoor? Trade Talks Stalled.

Baltic Dry Index. 1353 +50             Brent Crude 63.84

Spot Gold 3293                   US 2 Year Yield 3.92 -0.04   

US Federal Debt. 36.913 trillion  US GDP 30.038 trillion.

Nobody knows the political system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it.

Donald Trump

In normal times in the stock casinos, today being the last trading day of the month, it would be dress up stocks Friday.

But this is far from normal times in the US and global economy.

Though Trump’s tariffs are still “temporarily” in effect, no one knows what the final court outcome to Trump’s tariff wars on friend and foe alike, will be.

That outcome will likely set the global economy on a boom or bust trajectory.

Double stock options anyone?

With all this massive uncertainty, how does meaningful trade negotiation take place?

Asia-Pacific markets fall as U.S. appeals court reinstates Trump tariffs

Updated Fri, May 30 2025 12:14 AM EDT

Asia-Pacific markets fell Friday, with a slowing U.S. economy, inflation fears and uncertainties from the judicial developments surrounding U.S. President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs weighing on investor sentiment.

The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on Wednesday night that Trump had overstepped his authority when he imposed his “reciprocal” tariffs. The court ordered that the challenged tariff orders be vacated.

However, the Trump administration filed a notice of appeal shortly after the judgment, and an appeals court reinstated the levies on Thursday afternoon. The administration said it could ask the Supreme Court as early as Friday to pause the federal court’s original ruling if necessary.

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 declined 1.37% while the broader Topix index fell 0.52% as investors parsed a slew of data releases.

Tokyo’s core inflation reading for April, which captures consumer costs excluding fresh food, climbed 3.6% from a year ago, its highest level since January 2023.

In South Korea, the Kospi index dropped 0.72%, while the small-cap Kosdaq moved down 0.12% in choppy trade.

Mainland China’s CSI 300 index declined 0.33% while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index lost 1.48%.

Meanwhile, India’s benchmark Nifty 50 started trading flat while the BSE Sensex inched 0.24% lower.

Over in Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 was flat.

U.S. futures were little changed as investors await more trade news and fresh inflation data.

Overnight stateside, all three key benchmarks on Wall Street rose, even as gains were curtailed by caution around the court rulings on Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs.”

The S&P 500 moved up thanks to strong moves in chipmaker Nvidia. The broad-based index ended the day higher by 0.4% at 5,912.17 despite climbing as much as 0.9%.

Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite advanced 0.39% to 19,175.87, also well off its highest intraday gain of 1.5%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 117.03 points, or 0.28%, to finish at 42,215.73.

Asia markets today: Live updates for May 30, 2025

Second federal court rules against Trump’s signature tariffs, intensifying legal battle

Published May 29, 2025   Updated May 29, 2025, 2:39 p.m. ET

A second federal judge has ruled against President Donald Trump’s sweeping use of emergency tariffs, intensifying the legal and political battle over one of the administration’s signature economic policies.

US District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington, D.C., issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday blocking the government from collecting tariffs from two educational toy companies, Learning Resources Inc. and hand2mind Inc., who manufacture most of their products in Asia.

In his ruling, Contreras held that Trump lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose the duties outlined in four executive orders earlier this year.

“The International Economic Emergency Powers Act does not authorize the President to impose the tariffs set forth,” Contreras wrote, adding that the statute “doesn’t encompass the power to impose the sort of sweeping levies used by Trump.”

He noted that “in the five decades since IEEPA was enacted, no President until now has ever invoked the statute…to impose tariffs.”

The decision, which aligns with a separate ruling issued Wednesday by the US Court of International Trade in New York, delivers another blow to Trump’s second-term trade agenda.

A three-judge panel from that court similarly concluded that the president’s use of IEEPA to justify broad “reciprocal tariffs” was impermissible.

“That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [IEEPA] does not allow it,” the panel wrote.

In response, the Trump administration moved quickly to contain the fallout.

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion Thursday asking the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to freeze the earlier ruling, saying the decision “upends President Trump’s efforts to eliminate our exploding trade deficit and reorient the global economy on an equal footing.”

“Absent at least interim relief from this Court,” the department added, “the United States plans to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court tomorrow to avoid the irreparable national-security and economic harms at stake.”

Trump has relied heavily on IEEPA to justify a raft of tariffs in his second term, including duties on China, Mexico and Canada tied to fentanyl smuggling, as well as the April launch of broad reciprocal tariffs targeting nearly all US trading partners.

Legal analysts say the twin rulings significantly complicate the administration’s efforts to maintain that policy.

To allow time for appeal, Contreras delayed the enforcement of his order for 14 days.

The appeals process will now play out in two courts: the D.C. Circuit and the Federal Circuit in Washington, both of which sit just blocks from the White House.

If appellate courts uphold the rulings, the issue could land before the Supreme Court within weeks.

More

Second federal court rules against Trump’s signature tariffs, intensifying legal battle

U.S.-China talks ‘a bit stalled’ and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Treasury Secretary Bessent says

Published Thu, May 29 2025 9:39 PM EDT

BEIJING — U.S.-China trade talks “are a bit stalled,” requiring the two countries’ leaders to speak directly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News in an interview Thursday local time.

“I believe that we will be having more talks with them in the next few weeks,” he said, adding that there may be a call between the two countries’ leaders “at some point.”

After a rapid escalation in trade tensions last month, Bessent helped the world’s two largest economies reach a breakthrough agreement in Switzerland on May 12. The countries agreed to roll back recent tariff increases of more than 100% for 90 days, or until mid-August. Diplomatic officials from both sides had a call late last week.

Still, the U.S. has pushed ahead with tech restrictions on Beijing, drawing its ire, while China has yet to significantly ease restrictions on rare earths, contrary to Washington’s expectations.

“I think that given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity, that this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other,” Bessent said. “They have a very good relationship and I am confident that the Chinese will come to the table when President [Donald] Trump makes his [preferences] known.”

Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping last spoke in January, just before the U.S. president was sworn in for his second term. While Trump has in recent weeks said he would like to speak with Xi, analysts expect China to agree to that only if there’s certainty there will be no surprises from the U.S. during the call.

China has maintained communication with the U.S. since the agreement in Switzerland, Chinese Ministry of Commerce Spokesperson He Yongqian told reporters at a regular briefing Thursday.

But regarding chip export controls, she said that “China again urges the U.S. to immediately correct its wrong practices ... and together safeguard the consensus reached at high-level talks in Geneva.”

That’s according to a CNBC translation of her Mandarin-language remarks.

When asked whether China would suspend rare earths’ export controls announced in early April, He did not respond directly. Restrictions on items that could be used for both military and civilian use reflect international practice, as well as China’s position of “upholding world peace and regional stability,” she said.

This week, the Trump administration also announced it would start revoking visas for Chinese students.

“The U.S. decision to revoke Chinese student visas is fully unjustified,” China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning said Thursday, according to an official English transcript. “It uses ideology and national security as pretext.”

U.S.-China talks 'stalled' and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Bessent says

In other news, Trump tariffs by the back door?

Four tools at the Trump administration’s disposal after a U.S. court blocks tariffs

Published Thu, May 29 2025 4:06 AM EDT

U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to find a workaround after suffering a major blow to a core part of his economic agenda.

The U.S. Court of International Trade on Wednesday ruled that the president had overstepped his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs on numerous countries.

The Manhattan-based court not only ordered a permanent halt to most of Trump’s tariffs, but also barred any future modifications to them.

A panel of three judges gave the White House 10 days to complete the formal process of halting the tariffs. The Trump administration swiftly appealed the ruling.

Economists at Goldman Sachs said the White House has a few tools at its disposal that could ensure it is only a temporary problem.

“This ruling represents a setback for the administration’s tariff plans and increases uncertainty but might not change the final outcome for most major US trading partners,” analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a research note.

“For now, we expect the Trump administration will find other ways to impose tariffs,” they added.

Options on the table

The Wall Street bank said the ruling blocks the 10% baseline tariff imposed by Trump on most imports, as well as the additional tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico – but not sectoral tariffs, such as those imposed on steel, aluminum and autos.

The Trump administration does have other legal means of imposing tariffs, however, according to Goldman. These include Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, Section 301 and Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930.

Section 122 does not require a formal investigation and could therefore be one of the swiftest ways to get around the court roadblock.

“The administration could quickly replace the 10% across-the-board tariff with a similar tariff of up to 15% under Sec. 122,” analysts at Goldman said. They noted, however, that such a move would only last for up to 150 days after which law requires Congressional action.

Trump could also swiftly launch Section 301 investigations on key U.S. trading partners, laying the bureaucratic groundwork for tariffs, although Goldman said that this process will likely take several weeks at a minimum.

Section 232 tariffs, which are already in place for steel, aluminum and auto imports, could also be broadened to other sectors, while Section 338 allows the president to impose levies of up to 50% on imports from countries that discriminate against the U.S.

Goldman noted that the latter has not been used before.

What about the Supreme Court?

James Ransdell, partner at the law firm Cassidy Levy Kent, said the court opinion marks the first of many other cases still pending — and the first substantive opinion out of federal court “to really address the meat of the plaintiffs challenge.”

Ransdell said the speed of the Trump administration’s appeal was “very unusual” and suggests the government could be working through the night to prepare its motion for an emergency stay of the order.

He added that it was “certainly a possibility” that the Supreme Court could end up having the last say.

“There is not a lot of precedent on this particular statute and on similar actions by the president so there might be an interest that the Supreme Court has in taking this up,” Ransdell told CNBC’s “The China Connection” on Thursday.

Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard, said Trump had a “very good” level of understanding of how to play the courts to get what he wants in terms of playing for time.

“The first thing he will probably do is an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court … wanting to get a ruling from them that basically says you can keep these tariffs in place while the appeals process runs through,” Blitz said Thursday.

“This king-like executive order was always going to, at some point, going to run into the courts … The difference between being a monarchy and being a constitutional democracy is the legal system,” he added.

More

Trump expected to find a workaround after trade court blocks tariffs

Work hard. Someone's always watching.

Donald Trump

Global Inflation/Stagflation/Recession Watch.

Given our Magic Money Tree central banksters and our spendthrift politicians, inflation now needs an entire section of its own.

The Fed Forecasts Stagflation

May 28, 2025

Federal Reserve officials signaled concern at their meeting earlier this month that large tariff hikes would push up prices and could risk stoking higher inflation.

Policymakers largely agreed that heightened economic uncertainty and increased risks of both higher unemployment and inflation warranted no change in their wait-and-see policy stance, according to minutes of the May 6-7 meeting released Wednesday.

“Participants agreed that uncertainty about the economic outlook had increased further, making it appropriate to take a cautious approach until the net economic effects of the array of changes to government policies become clearer,” said the minutes.

Between officials’ most recent meetings in mid-March and early May, President Trump ratcheted up tariffs on most U.S. trading partners before suspending some of the most aggressive hikes. The minutes released Wednesday provided a written account of how officials were digesting those initial moves.

Expectations of a rate cut at the Fed’s next meeting in mid-June declined after Fed Chair Jerome Powell said at a news conference after the last meeting that the costs of waiting to learn more about the economy were “fairly low.” In public comments since the meeting, Fed officials have roundly endorsed that view, implying a high bar for the Fed to cut interest rates.

Since officials last met, Trump agreed to lower tariffs on China to 30% from 145%. The detente with Beijing has calmed nervous investors who feared the U.S. economy might slow down rapidly and force the Fed to consider cutting rates to shore up a flagging labor market.

Investors in interest-rate futures markets expect the Fed will hold rates steady through the summer.

The Fed lowered its benchmark rate by a percentage point last year, to around 4.3%, after inflation declined and the unemployment rate crept up. The central bank had raised rates to a two-decade high in 2022 and 2023 to combat inflation.

Trump last month backed off an implied threat to sack Powell, but he has continued hectoring the central bank leader to reduce rates.

The minutes strongly suggest the Fed isn’t close to lowering rates anytime soon. Instead, the meeting summary, released with the customary three-week delay, highlighted fears over a recipe for stagflation, where economic activity slows while price increases accelerate.

Trade-policy announcements prompted the Fed’s staff economists to revise lower their expectations for economic growth this year and next year compared with a forecast prepared for the March meeting. As a result, the labor market was projected to “weaken substantially” over the rest of the year, leading the unemployment rate to rise and remain elevated through 2027.

Tariffs, meanwhile, were expected to “boost inflation markedly this year and to provide a smaller boost in 2026,” the minutes said. Even after substantially revising their inflation forecast for 2025, officials thought that if their forecast turns out to be wrong, it would be because inflation was even higher in 2026 or 2027.

The minutes suggested that officials were particularly focused on the risks of higher inflation. The minutes said almost all policymakers in attendance flagged the risk that inflation could be more persistent than expected, the minutes said.

Many officials said business contacts or survey responses suggested firms “were planning to either partially or fully pass on tariff-related cost increases to consumers,” the minutes said. Some expressed concern that tariffs on intermediate goods, such as steel or aluminum, could put additional pressure on inflation.

More

The Fed Forecasts Stagflation

Covid-19 Corner

This section will continue only occasionally when something of interest occurs.

 

Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, among other things, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported.

Glaphene: 2D hybrid material integrates graphene and silica glass for next-generation electronics

28 May 2025

Some of the most promising materials for future technologies come in layers just one atom thick, such as graphene, a sheet of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, prized for its exceptional strength and conductivity. While hundreds of such materials exist, truly merging them into something new has remained a challenge. Most efforts simply stack these atom-thin sheets like a deck of cards, but the layers typically lack significant interaction between them.

An international team of researchers led by Rice University materials scientists has succeeded in creating a genuine 2D hybrid by chemically integrating two fundamentally different 2D materials—graphene and silica glass—into a single, stable compound called glaphene, according to a study published in Advanced Materials.

"The layers do not just rest on each other; electrons move and form new interactions and vibration states, giving rise to properties neither material has on its own," said Sathvik Iyengar, a doctoral student at Rice and a first author on the study.

More importantly, Iyengar explained, the method could apply to a wide range of 2D materials, enabling the development of designer 2D hybrids for next-generation electronics, photonics and quantum devices.

"It opens the door to combining entirely new classes of 2D materials—such as metals with insulators or magnets with semiconductors—to create custom-built materials from the ground up," Iyengar said.

The team developed a two-step, single-reaction method to grow glaphene using a liquid chemical precursor that contains both silicon and carbon. By tuning oxygen levels during heating, they first grew graphene then shifted conditions to favor the formation of a silica layer. This required a custom high-temperature, low-pressure apparatus designed over several months in collaboration with Anchal Srivastava, a visiting professor from Banaras Hindu University in India.

"That setup was what made the synthesis possible," Iyengar said. "The resulting material is a true hybrid with new electronic and structural properties."

Once the material was synthesized, the Rice team worked on confirming its structure with Manoj Tripathi and Alan Dalton at the University of Sussex. One of the first clues that glaphene was something new came from an anomaly. When the team analyzed the material using Raman spectroscopy—a technique that detects how atoms vibrate by measuring subtle shifts in scattered laser light—they found signals that did not match either graphene or silica. These unexpected vibrational features hinted at a deeper interaction between the layers.

---- To better understand how the bonded layers behave at the atomic level, the team collaborated with Vincent Meunier at Pennsylvania State University to verify the experimental results against quantum simulations. These confirmed that the graphene and silica layers interact and bond in a unique way, partially sharing electrons across the interface. This hybrid bonding changes the material's structure and behavior, turning a metal and an insulator into a new type of semiconductor.

---- Pulickel Ajayan, Rice's Benjamin M. and Mary Greenwood Anderson Professor of Engineering and professor of materials science and nanoengineering, said that while the discovery of glaphene is significant on its own, what makes the research truly exciting is the broader method it introduces: a new platform for chemically combining fundamentally different 2D materials.

More information: Sathvik Ajay Iyengar et al, Glaphene: A Hybridization of 2D Silica Glass and Graphene, Advanced Materials (2025). DOI: 10.1002/adma.202419136

Glaphene: 2D hybrid material integrates graphene and silica glass for next-generation electronics

Next, the world global debt clock. Nations debts to GDP compared.

World Debt Clocks (usdebtclock.org)

Another weekend and it’s anyone’s guess what Trump tariffs will apply next week, next month, next year? How does the EU or China (or anyone) negotiate on trade, given that most of the Trump tariffs are now illegal, but still “temporarily” in effect?

In the weekend LIR probably the best concerto written for the cembalo, better known as harpsichord in English,  by the long forgotten Belgian composer Toni Fredi Gresnick, although he didn’t know he was Belgian, Belgium not existing at the time.

Have a great weekend everyone.

The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.

Henry A. Kissinger