December
2, 2020 9:26 PM
Updated 43 minutes ago By David
Lawder
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - The Trump administration expanded economic pressure on China’s
western region of Xinjiang, banning cotton imports from a powerful Chinese
quasi-military organization that it says uses the forced labor of detained
Uighur Muslims.
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection
agency said on Wednesday its “Withhold Release Order” would ban cotton and
cotton products from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), one
of China’s largest producers.
The move, which could have a sweeping effect
on companies involved in selling textiles and apparel to the United States, is
among several the Trump administration has been working on in its final weeks
to harden the U.S. position against China, making it more difficult for
President-elect Joe Biden to ease U.S.-China tensions.
The targeting of XPCC, which produced here 30% of China's cotton in
2015, follows a Treasury Department ban in July on all dollar transactions with
the sprawling business-and-paramilitary entity, founded in 1954 to settle
China's far west.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary
Kenneth Cuccinelli, who oversees the border agency, called “Made in China” a
“warning label.”
“The cheap cotton goods you may be buying for family and friends during
this season of giving - if coming from China - may have been made by slave
labor in some of the most egregious human rights violations existing today in
the modern world,” he told a news conference.
Cuccinelli said a region-wide Xinjiang cotton import ban was still being
studied.
The United Nations cites what it says are credible reports that 1
million Muslims held in camps have been put to work. China denies mistreating
Uighurs and says the camps are vocational training centers needed to fight
extremism.
While the Treasury sanctions target XPCC’s financial structure,
Wednesday’s action will force apparel firms and other companies shipping cotton
products into the United States to eliminate XPCC-produced cotton fiber from
many stages of their supply chains, said Brenda Smith, CBP’s executive
assistant commissioner for trade.
“That pretty much blocks all Chinese cotton textile imports,” said a
China-based cotton trader, who asked not to be identified because of the
sensitivity of the issue.
Identifying cotton from a specific supplier will sharply raise
manufacturing costs, and only the few large companies with fully integrated
operations across the complex textile supply chain could guarantee that no XPCC
product has been used, the trader said.
More
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-trade-china/u-s-bans-cotton-imports-from-china-producer-xpcc-citing-xinjiang-slave-labor-idUKKBN28D0IG
Finally, despite many other ski resorts closing, Swiss
ski resorts are opening for Christmas and New Year. But will it all go downhill
for the Covid tempting Swiss? Are the Swiss just taking the piste? Apres-ski, Covid-19?
Swiss plough ahead with skiing
despite neighbours' fears
December 2,
2020 11:36 AM By Denis Balibouse
VERBIER,
Switzerland (Reuters) - Swiss ski resorts are ploughing ahead with preparations
for the year-end holiday season despite pressure from neighbouring Italy,
France and Germany to shut until the latest coronavirus wave passes.
Health Minister Alain Berset has proposed limits on the capacity of ski
lifts at Christmas and the New Year, but lift operators and mountain regions
who already expect many foreign visitors to stay away during the festive period
bristle at added restrictions.
Verbier Mayor Eloi Rossier acknowledged feeling the heat from other
countries, but said that his town’s ski economy was too important to simply
call off the season, especially given measures the resort was taking to keep
people safe.
He expects up to 45,000 people over Christmas and New Year, fewer than
normal due to “a lot of cancellations.
“There is an economic aspect that we cannot deny, it is extremely
important,” Rossier said. “But it is not skiing that’s dangerous for
transmitting the virus, but the stuff that comes after skiing, the apres-ski.
And here we took extremely strict measures to limit...the risks.”
France, with no skiing before January, plans border checks to deter
people, President Emmanuel Macron said, while Germany’s Bavaria state is
considering similar spot checks followed by a 14-day quarantine upon return.
Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz was due to present his country’s ski
plan on Wednesday. The Swiss government, which has said lifts can stay open if
they have strict health measures in place, meets on Friday.
In Verbier in southern Switzerland, lift operator Televerbier was not
expecting droves of people, given that foreign visitors who make up as many as
half of a typical winter’s crowd are unlikely to travel this year.
“We lost a big part of our clients...from Asia, the Middle East or the
Americas, so we don’t think that if the Italians or French remain closed that
they will compensate,” Televerbier Chief Executive Laurent Vaucher said.
More
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-ski-verbier/swiss-plough-ahead-with-skiing-despite-neighbours-fears-idUKKBN28C1KB?il=0
Winter
Watch.
The Arctic winter sea-ice expansion and
northern hemisphere snow cover. From around mid-October, the northern
hemisphere snow cover usually rapidly expands, while the Arctic ice gradually
expands back towards its winter maximum.
Over simplified, a rapid expansion of
both, especially if early, can be a sign of a harsher than normal arriving northern
hemisphere winter. Perhaps more so in 2020-2021 as we’re in the low of the
ending sunspot cycle, which possibly also influenced this year’s record
Atlantic hurricane season.
Update: we seem to have started new sunspot cycle 25 this month ,
though it’s unlikely to affect 2020-2021s coming winter.
Northern Eur-Asia turned snowy fast in
mid-October. The Arctic sea ice
expansion was slow, and from a very low level at the end of September, but with
the vastly expanded snow cover, sea ice formation sped up.
With the Laptev sea ice virtually back
to normal at the end of November I’m
starting to think that it will likely be a normal to slightly warmer winter
ahead for western Europe.
The failure of the Kara Sea ice to
return to normal, leads me to bet on a warmer western European winter ahead.
Arctic
and Antarctic Sea Ice.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
https://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/ims/ims_gif/DATA/cursnow_asiaeurope.gif
Covid-19 Corner
This
section will continue until it becomes unneeded.
Pfizer Vaccine Cleared by U.K.;
German Deaths Jump: Virus Update
Bloomberg News
December 1, 2020, 11:02 PM GMT Updated on December 2, 2020,
9:20 AM GMT
The U.K. became the first western country to approve a
Covid-19 vaccine, clearing Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech
SE ’s shot. In Germany, the daily death toll from the virus rose to the
highest since mid-April.
Hong Kong plans to raise the fine for people who break
social distancing rules fivefold to HK$10,000 ($1,290), a local newspaper
reported. The city plans to offer free coronavirus vaccinations for all its
residents, a top health official was cited as saying.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control’s new guidance will
cut quarantine time for individuals exposed to the coronavirus by as much as
half, people familiar with the matter said. Texas reported a record number of
new cases, while Covid-19 hospitalizations in California reached a new high.
Key Developments:
More
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-01/antibody-test-ok-d-fauci-looks-to-herd-immunity-virus-update?srnd=coronavirus
Two Global Efforts Try to Trace
the Origin of the Covid Virus
Both teams want to know when—or how
often—the virus passed from animals to people. But the trail may have gone
cold, and the search has gotten political.
12.02.2020 07:00
AM
With cases soaring in the United States and
elsewhere, the Covid-19 pandemic is nowhere near its end—but with three
vaccines reporting trial data and two apparently nearing approval by the US
Food and Drug Administration, it may be reaching a pivot point. In what feels
like a moment of drawing breath and taking stock, international researchers are
turning their attention from the present back to the start of the pandemic,
aiming to untangle its origin and asking what lessons can be learned to keep
this from happening again.
Two efforts are happening in parallel. On November 5, the
World Health Organization quietly published
the rules of engagement for a long-planned and months-delayed mission that
creates a multinational team of researchers who will pursue how the virus
leaped species. Meanwhile, last week, a commission
created by The Lancet and headed by the economist and policy expert
Jeffrey Sachs announced the formation of its own international effort, a task
force of 12 experts from nine countries who will undertake similar tasks.
Both groups will face the same complex problems. It has
been approximately a year since the first cases of a pneumonia of unknown
origin appeared in Wuhan, China, and about 11 months since the pneumonia’s cause
was identified as a novel coronavirus, probably originating in bats. The
experts will have to retrace a chain of transmission—one or multiple leaps of
the virus from the animal world into humans—using interviews, stored biological
samples, lab assays, environmental surveys, genomic data, and the thousands of
papers published since the pandemic began, all while following a trail that may
have gone cold.
The point is not to look for patient zero, the first person infected—or
even a hypothetical bat zero, the single animal from which the novel virus
jumped. It’s likely neither of those will ever be found. The goal instead is to
elucidate the ecosystem—physical, but also viral—in which the spillover
happened and ask what could make it likely to happen again.
“This is not a simple case of going to a market and picking up samples
and testing,” says Peter Daszak, the president of the nonprofit research
organization EcoHealth Alliance, who leads the Lancet commission task
force. “This is about what's been changing on the ground in the region, in
terms of the ecology of viruses and the social science of contact with
wildlife—going back to SARS—and asking what research was done that could have
been used to protect us, and was done or was not.”
More
https://www.wired.com/story/two-global-efforts-try-to-trace-the-origin-of-the-covid-virus/?bxid=5cc9e09a3f92a477a0e84d6d&cndid=52110326&esrc=Wired_etl_load&mbid=mbid%3DCRMWIR012019%0A%0A&source=EDT_WIR_NEWSLETTER_0_DAILY_ZZ&utm_brand=wired&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_content=Final&utm_mailing=WIR_Daily_120220&utm_medium=email&utm_source=nl&utm_term=list1_p4
Scientists outraged by Peter
Daszak leading enquiry into possible Covid lab leak
Published: 23 September 2020
Lead investigator is
considered one of the most conflicted and unreliable voices on the issue.
Jonathan Matthews reports
Expressions of outrage and incredulity have greeted the announcement that Peter
Daszak , president of EcoHealth Alliance, has been chosen to lead a Task Force
that will examine the possibility that Covid-19 could have emerged from a lab,
as part of an investigation into the origins of the virus.
Daszak has promised to undertake the investigation “with an open
mind”. But this is hard to imagine, given his previous dismissals
of suggestions that SARS-CoV-2 could have leaked from a lab as “preposterous”,
“baseless”, “crackpot”, “conspiracy theories” and “pure baloney”.
Misinformation super-spreader
Daszak’s investigation forms part of the work of the Lancet
Covid-19 Commission – a body launched in July to look at the handling of the
pandemic and “offer practical solutions”. In a statement , the Commission said it was “extremely important
that the research into the origins of SARS-CoV-2 should proceed … in a
scientific and objective way that is unhindered by geopolitical agendas and
misinformation”.
But Daszak himself is considered
a misinformation super-spreader by critics like Rutgers University
microbiologist Richard Ebright, who has accused him of lying “on a Trumpian
scale”, and the evolutionary theorist Bret Weinstein who has labelled him
“Patient Zero for misinformation” on the origins of Covid-19.
There
is also the issue of conflicts of interest. Although Daszak declared
in The Lancet that he has “no competing interests” on Covid-19, and likewise
told the Washington Post he has “no conflicts of interest”, Alina Chan, a
molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, points out that he is a “long-time friend, collaborator and
funder of the Shi lab” – the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab led by Shi
Zhengli that is most often identified as the probable source of any lab leak.
In fact, Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance has helped finance
both the WIV’s bat coronavirus surveillance and its bat coronavirus
gain-of-function research (research aimed at making a virus more infective),
with the help of multi-million dollar grants from the US government. This, of
course, means Daszak’s own activities are material to the subject he is
investigating: the origins of a bat-derived coronavirus pandemic that broke out
in the very city to which he helped lab workers bring bat coronaviruses for
storage, analysis and experimentation.
More
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/19538-scientists-outraged-by-peter-daszak-leading-enquiry-into-possible-covid-lab-leak
Next, some vaccine links
kindly sent along from a LIR reader in Canada. The links come from a most
informative update from Stanford Hospital in California.
World
Health Organization - Landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines . https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines
NY
Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker . https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html
Stanford
Website . https://racetoacure.stanford.edu/clinical-trials/132
Regulatory
Focus COVID-19 vaccine tracker . https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker
Some other useful Covid links.
Johns Hopkins Coronavirus
resource centre
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
Rt Covid-19
https://rt.live/
Covid19info.live
https://wuflu.live/
Centers for Disease Control
Coronavirus
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html
The Spectator Covid-19 data tracker (UK)
https://data.spectator.co.uk/city/national
Technology Update.
With events happening
fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section.
Updates as they get reported. Is converting sunlight to usable cheap AC or DC
energy mankind’s future from the 21st century onwards.
Today, something different. China lands on the moon and
collects expensive rocks. An American telescope crashes to earth, and it wasn’t
made in Japan.
China lands probe on surface of
the moon and collects lunar soil
By Katie Hunt and Steven Jiang , CNN
Updated 1014 GMT (1814 HKT) December 2,
2020
China has successfully landed a lunar probe on a previously unexplored
area of the moon.
The robotic spacecraft, named Chang'e 5 after the mythical Chinese
goddess of the moon, drilled into the surface of the moon to collect soil early
Wednesday. It will remain on the moon collecting soil and rock samples until
Thursday, guided by mission control on the ground, China's state-run news
agency Xinhua reported.
It's the first attempt to collect rocks from the moon by any country
since the 1970s.
The samples, expected to weigh about 2 kilograms (4.5 pounds), will be
sealed into a container in the spacecraft.
If successful, the mission will make China only the third country to
have retrieved lunar samples, following the United States and the former Soviet
Union decades ago.
Astronauts from the United States brought back 382 kilograms (842
pounds) of rocks and soil between 1969 and 1972 during the Apollo program,
while the Soviet Union collected 170.1 grams (6 ounces) of samples in 1976.
When the samples are returned to Earth, scientists will be able to
analyze the structure, physical properties and material composition of the
moon's soil, China's space agency said.
The mission may help answer questions such as how long the moon remained
volcanically active in its interior, and when its magnetic field -- key to
protecting any form of life from the sun's radiation -- dissipated.
A Long March-5 rocket carrying Chang'e-5 spacecraft blasted off from
Wenchang Spacecraft
Launch Site on the island of Hainan off China's southern coast on
November 24.
The spacecraft landed on a previously unvisited area of the moon -- a
massive lava plain known as Oceanus Procellarum, or "Ocean of
Storms." This large dark spot, stretching about 2,900 kilometers (1,800
miles) wide, could be a scar from a giant cosmic impact that created an ancient
sea of magma, according to NASA.
The landing marks the third time a Chinese lunar probe has successfully
landed on the surface of the moon, the state-run Xinhua news agency reported.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/01/asia/china-moon-change-5-landing-scn/index.html
Arecibo radio telescope collapses
in dramatic platform fall
By David Szondy December 01, 2020
In
a dramatic ending, the famous 1,000-ft Arecibo radio
telescope in Puerto Rico collapsed this Tuesday at about 7:55
am local time. The 900-ton instrument platform fell and crashed into the dish
from a height of 492 ft.
According
to the National Science Foundation (NSF), there were no injuries reported. On
November 6, an area around what was at one time the largest single-dish
telescope in the world had been declared off-limits to unauthorized personnel
after a cable failed .
A previous
cable failure in August severely damaged the fragile mesh dish. On November
19, the decision to dismantle the giant radio telescope had been announced
after an engineering survey found that the structure was dangerously unstable.
This week's collapse occurred when the tops of all three
support towers broke away, dropping the platform and its support cables, though
the exact cause will require a full investigation. In the collapse, the
observatory's learning center is reported to have suffered significant damage.
We
are saddened by this situation but thankful that no one was hurt," says
NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. "When engineers advised the NSF that
the structure was unstable and presented a danger to work teams and Arecibo
staff, we took their warnings seriously and continued to emphasize the
importance of safety for everyone involved. Our focus is now on assessing the
damage, finding ways to restore operations at other parts of the observatory,
and working to continue supporting the scientific community, and the people of
Puerto Rico."
https://newatlas.com/space/arecibo-radio-telescope-collapses/?utm_source=New+Atlas+Subscribers&utm_campaign=09fad9cafd-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_12_02_09_12&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-09fad9cafd-90625829
"Indeed the
temporary breaks in the market which preceded the crash were a serious trial
for those who had declined fantasy. Early in 1928, in June, in December, and in
February and March of 1929 it seemed that the end had come. On various of these
occasions the [New York] Times
happily reported the return to reality. And then the market took flight again.
Only a durable sense of doom could survive such discouragement. The time was
coming when the optimists would reap a rich harvest of discredit. But it has
long since been forgotten that for many months those who resisted reassurance
were similarly, if less permanently discredited.”
J. K. Galbraith. The
Great Crash: 1929.
No comments:
Post a Comment