The
big story this week, and in all likelihood until the US election on November 3rd,
until the new Congress gets sworn in on January 3rd, and the next
President sworn in on January 20th, is just how much is the USA
going to change in the next 4 years?
Make
no mistake, the USA is about to undergo massive political, social and economic
change no matter what the election outcome.
President
Trump has promised to announce a new Supreme Court Justice this week to fill
the vacancy. The Democrats are acting like spoilt teenagers, outraged at a
Republican President following President Clinton’s nomination of extreme left
wing Justice Ginsburg. President Trump, will of course nominate a conservative
Justice.
Leading
Democrats at the weekend have suggested that if he does and the Senate confirms
the Justice,and if they win the Senateand
Presidency in November, they will gerrymander the constitution.
Namely,
add more left wing Justices to the Supreme Court to get a socialist majority.
Make Puerto Rica and Washington D.C. into states, adding 3 or 4 Senators and
Congressmen to their Democrat majority. And though they didn’t specifically state
this, probably revisiting their calls in 2016-2017 to abolish the Electoral
College.
If
President Trump’s nominee fails or simply isn’t voted on, any disputed 2020
Presidential election, would end up in front of a Supreme Court that might
split 4v4.If so, that seems to make for a President Pelosi President, though I’m not sure if she gets to pick
the new Vice President or the Congress does.
If
President Trump gets elected, but the Republicans lose the Senate, the
impeachment process starts all over again.
No
Electoral College and the east coast states, plus the west coast states, plus Chicago,
get dominate future US elections. A very different socialist, re-distributive, “eat
the rich,” future USA lies ahead.
All
in all, for now, the USA and the dollar are very far from a safe harbour, politically
stable investment destination.
Shares cling to tight ranges as
attention shifts to U.S. election, stimulus
September 21,
2020
PHILADELPHIA/WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden urged Senate
Republicans not to vote on any candidate nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court as
the November election nears, calling President Donald Trump’s plan an “exercise
of raw political power.”
A second Senate Republican on Sunday voiced objections to Trump’s plan
for a quick vote on a replacement to liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who
died on Friday. Such an appointment by the president, if approved by the
Senate, would cement a 6-3 conservative majority that could influence American
law and life for decades.
“Voters of this country should be heard ... they’re the ones who this
Constitution envisions should decide who has the power to make this
appointment,” Biden, who leads Trump in national opinion polls, said in
Philadelphia. “To jam this nomination through the Senate is just an exercise of
raw political power.”
Biden said that if he wins the Nov. 3 election, he should have the chance
to nominate the next Supreme Court justice.
---- He reiterated his pledge to nominate an
African-American woman to the court, which would be a historic first, if he has
the opportunity.
Earlier on Sunday, Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she did not
support Trump’s plan to move fast on filling the seat, becoming the second of
the 53 Republicans in the 100-seat chamber to object publicly following
Ginsburg’s death.
On Saturday, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine said the
presidential election winner should pick the nominee. She is locked in a tight
re-election battle, while Murkowski’s current term extends two more years.
Senator Lamar Alexander, another moderate Republican, said in a
statement he did not object to a vote, adding: “No one should be surprised that
a Republican Senate majority would vote on a Republican president’s Supreme
Court nomination, even during a presidential election year.”
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer did not rule out that his party
might move in future to end the filibuster, a procedural tactic under which the
support of 60 members is required to move to a vote on legislation, if the
Republicans went ahead with the nomination.
“We first have to win the majority. ... But if we win the majority,
everything is on the table,” he said.
Schumer and U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York
told a joint news conference that putting another conservative on the court
would put at risk healthcare and women’s and LGBTQ rights.
---- Trump said on Saturday he would make
his nomination this week and named Amy Coney Barrett of the Chicago-based 7th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Barbara Lagoa of the Atlanta-based 11th
Circuit as possible candidates to fill the vacancy created by Ginsburg, a
revered figure among liberals.
---- “I will be putting forth a nominee next
week. It will be a woman,” Trump said at a campaign rally in Fayetteville,
North Carolina, where supporters chanted: “Fill that seat.”
Trump and McConnell have time to schedule a vote. While elections are on
Nov. 3, a new Congress will not be sworn in until Jan. 3, with the winner of
the presidential contest inaugurated on Jan. 20.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senate Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer joined forces in Brooklyn on Sunday night to call for a
national mobilization against confirming a replacement for the late Ruth Bader
Ginsburg before Inauguration Day.
Speaking at James Madison High School, which Ginsburg
attended, both Democrats used dramatic terms to describe the potential fallout
of replacing Ginsburg with a conservative chosen by President Donald Trump.
“We need to make sure that we mobilize on an unprecedented
scale,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “This is our entire livelihood that could be shaped
by the next 60 or so days,” she said, referring to the period before the Nov. 3
election and the court’s hearing of the case to overturn the Affordable Care
Act shortly thereafter.
“Our reproductive rights are on the line. Our labor rights
are on the line. Our right to health care is on the line,” she added.
Aside from health care, the two New York lawmakers warned
about perils to voting rights, the plight of immigrants who were brought to the
U.S. illegally as children and even the Earth’s climate.
Schumer didn’t rule out increasing the size of the Supreme
Court if Trump’s nominee is confirmed.
“Once we win the majority, God
willing, everything is on the table,” Schumer said, referring to elections for
the Senate. “If we don’t win the majority, these questions are all moot.”
Schumer said 100 years of progress is potentially at stake.
He said his own daughter and her wife wondered during Rosh Hashanah dinner if
marriage equality might be reversed by a new court.
Both cited Ginsburg’s last wish that the next president
pick her successor.
“We’re here because the American people want those rights
preserved. We do not want to turn the clock back. And we only need two more
senators to say that they will abide by RBG’s wish,” Schumer said.
Following the markets on both sides of the Atlantic since 1968. A dinosaur, who evolved with the financial system as it was perverted from capitalism to banksterism after the great Nixonian error of abandoning the dollar's link to gold instead of simply revaluing gold. Our money is too important to be left to probity challenged central banksters and crooked politicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment