Friday, 11 October 2019

Trade Deal “Lite” Back On.


Baltic Dry Index. 1929 +56 Brent Crude 59.42 Spot Gold 1495

Never ending Brexit now October 31, maybe. 20 days away.
Trump’s Nuclear China Tariffs Now In Effect.
The USA v EU trade war starts October 18. Just 7 days away.

“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win.”

President Donald Trump.

Desperate for a trade deal to shore up his re-election bid for the Presidency, President Trump reversed himself yet again, and seems now to be willing to settle for a limited trade deal with China, even to the extent of dropping next week’s increased tariffs on Chinese goods, due to come in on October 15.

The whipsawed markets responded with yet another relief rally, though each relief rally is now, unsurprisingly, weaker than the one before. This isn’t exactly “winning.”

Meanwhile, global political developments go from bad to worse. Aside from a Turkish invasion of Syria’s Kurds, just abandoned by President Trump, greenlighting Turkey’s invasion, but calling into question the wisdom of allying with Trump’s America, there’s a dramatic rise in the number of the US public calling for President Trump’s impeachment, according to the latest polls.

Sooner or later,  but my guess is sooner, this political melodrama will have a serious drag effect on US stocks.

Below, yesterday’s developments. On to day two of the trade talks and a meeting between President Trump and China’s top trade representative Vice Premier Liu He. While it may not be good for business, it’s certainly good for stock market trading action. Churn and burn away at the top.

Asian shares up as 'very good' trade talks boost risk appetite

October 11, 2019 / 2:14 AM / Updated an hour ago
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Asian shares rose on Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would meet with China’s top trade negotiator, stirring hopes for an agreement, while sterling was flat after earlier jumping on optimism over a potential Brexit deal.

Investors' renewed appetite for riskier assets continued to weigh on the safe-haven yen JPY= and U.S. Treasury prices, while oil stayed firm on comments about possible supply cuts from the head of OPEC.

MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan .MIAPJ0000PUS rose 1.2%, following on from gains on Wall Street. S&P e-mini futures ESc1 added more than 0.3%.

Australian shares climbed 0.8%, while Japan's Nikkei stock index .N225 gained 1%. Chinese blue-chips .CSI300 added 0.5%.

The bullish market mood came after a first day of trade talks between top U.S. and Chinese negotiators, characterised by Trump as “very, very good.”

---- Even before Trump's comments, hopes for an agreement helped to lift U.S. markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average .DJI added 0.57%, the S&P 500 .SPX gained 0.64% and the Nasdaq Composite .IXIC rose 0.6%.

But while optimism around trade talks helped to drive a “classic risk-on session” overnight, the lack of runaway enthusiasm reflected broader investor caution, said Matt Simpson, senior market analyst at GAIN Capital in Singapore. “We know that it’s just a few words from Trump.”

Further positive developments in trade talks could boost markets on Monday, but low expectations for a deal mean that the lack of an agreement would not “necessarily (be) the end of the world for risk,” he added.

Analysts at National Australia Bank said freezing tariffs at current levels would be unlikely to reverse the trade-driven slowdown in economic growth.
More

Day 1 of U.S.-China trade talks ends with hopes for limited deal

October 10, 2019 / 6:09 AM / Updated 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Top U.S. and Chinese negotiators wrapped up a first day of trade talks in more than two months on Thursday as business groups expressed optimism the two sides might be able to ease a 15-month trade war and delay a U.S. tariff hike scheduled for next week.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer met with Vice Premier Liu He and other senior Chinese officials for about seven hours at the USTR’s headquarters near the White House. 

“We had a very, very good negotiation with China,” U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters after the talks concluded. He reiterated his plans to meet with Liu at the White House on Friday, regarded as a good sign.

A White House official said talks had gone very well, “probably better than expected.”

A smiling Liu waved to reporters before departing the USTR in a black Cadillac, without answering questions. The two sides were due to meet for a final day on Friday.

Negotiators could agree to low-level “early harvest” agreements on issues such as currencies and copyright protections, despite increased irritants between the world’s two largest economies, a U.S. Chamber of Commerce official briefed by both sides said earlier on Thursday.

Myron Brilliant, the Chamber’s head of international affairs, told reporters that negotiators were “trying to find a path toward the bigger deal” with progress on market access and less controversial intellectual property and other issues.

“I believe that there’s even the possibility of a currency agreement this week. I think that could lead to a decision by the U.S. administration to not put forth a tariff rate hike on Oct. 15.”

Trump launched the trade war against China with demands for sweeping structural reforms, but Beijing has indicated it is not willing to fundamentally change the way it controls China’s economy. Asked by reporters on Thursday whether he was prepared to accept a “smaller deal,” Trump did not answer and walked away.

Previously, the president said he did not want to have a more limited deal, preferring to hold out for one that was broad in scope.
More

Finally, an expert sees trouble ahead for US stocks, trade deal or no trade deal with China.  WeWork signals a return to sanity in US IPOs. The tide is now going out, not coming in.

Expert who called the 2008 crisis says repeat of December meltdown is inevitable

By Barbara Kollmeyer  Published: Oct 10, 2019 8:35 a.m. ET
----And then earnings season kicks off next week with some big banks. Before you know it, we’re hitting the holidays and maybe some uneasy flashbacks to last year’s December stock meltdown.

A repeat of that rout may be unavoidable, warns our call of the day from former Goldman Sachs alumnus Raoul Pal. “We’re coming into a period of illiquidity for equities,” the author of the Global Macro Investor newsletter, followed by the world’s biggest hedge funds, told MarketWatch in a recent interview. 

He cites three reasons why a repeat of that stock selloff may be inevitable. The first is the blackout period for companies, which hits around earnings time when their share buy backs start to slow. 
Secondly, he notes that this year has also seen problems with the short-term borrowing market, or repo market, that the Federal Reserve has been trying to tackle. It could mean less buying from market makers — who help create liquidity for markets by bringing buyers and sellers together.
Pal says the third biggest issue facing stocks involves the baby boomers, Americans born between the mid 1940s and mid 1960s. They face an annual requirement to sell about 5% of their individual retirement accounts, loaded with stocks in some cases, as they reach 70.5 years old.

“The problem is the gap between this year and last year is huge. It’s like 50% increase in the amount of selling that has to be done,” said Pal. “They have to start selling by year-end. If you take out the Christmas week and you’re a financial adviser, and you want to get this done early, you will start in October.”

He blames boomer selling for part of the meltdown for stocks late last year. “The marginal change of an American baby boomer thinking ‘I’ve got too much equities,’ which they do have — that is catastrophic for the system, because they have way, way too much risk,” says Pal, co-founder of Real Vision financial television.

Opinion: WeWork is a symptom of a disease that may not have a cure

Published: Oct 10, 2019 6:35 p.m. ET

The spectacular blow-up of the proposed public offering of WeWork’s parent company We Co. shows that the public markets are savvier than private investors about buying into the hype of high-value, high-risk unicorn companies masquerading as tech companies.

The public market’s response to the most recent batch of these mega-private valuation companies? A firm, “No thanks.” 

“The Street has gotten sort of stale on the idea of hope,” said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company. “I don’t think [the IPO window] is shut, but there has got to be more deals like Zoom ZM, -2.54%   and Pinterest PINS, +0.55%, where you have a light at the end of the tunnel...You have to have a [business] model that is profitable eventually.”

---- The seeming tide of never-ending losses at We, Uber Technologies Inc. UBER, -0.69% UBER, -0.69% Lyft Inc. LYFT, -1.31%, and Peloton Interactive Inc. PTON, -3.58% has become a problem for investors, along with corporate governance issues at companies like We and Peloton.

Before the We Co. completely shelved its IPO, the office-sharing company was planning to go public with three classes of stock, ensuring majority control would remain with Founder Adam Neumann, who stepped down last month as CEO but remains non-executive chairman. As a private company, 
We had a valuation of $47 billion at the time of its last funding raise. But ultimately, its bankers could not even take it public at a valuation of $15 billion.

---- “I think the message is that a path to profitably that does not require magical thinking matters,” said Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consulting firm which advises company management on the process of going public. “So does corporate governance, and at what valuation it is being offered.”

Zoom Technologies, a corporate video streaming service, and Pinterest Inc., a photo pinning social network, as Morgan from Synovus pointed out, have an actual technology product. But the biggest losers in the IPO market in recent months beyond the We Co. are companies that claim to be tech companies, but are really using technology to enhance a product, such as a car service from Uber and UBER, -0.69% Lyft, Peloton’s exercise bike, and Fiverr International Ltd. FVRR, +0.29% a freelance job-seeking hub that has trademarked the word gig.
More

"The rules-based multilateral trading system is the bedrock of economic globalization and free trade, and provides important safeguards for win-win outcomes. The authority and efficacy of the system should be respected and protected. Some WTO rules do need to be improved. The right approach is for all to sit down as equals to find solutions.

"The fundamental principles of free trade should be upheld, the interests and concerns of all parties be accommodated, and the broadest possible consensus on reform be built up. Taking a unilateralist approach will not solve any problems."

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang. September 2018.

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

We’re sticking with historic hurricanes again today, but this time on the other side of the Atlantic, in the North Sea. Only they didn’t know it as a remnant of a probable hurricane, just as a great storm.

Don’t let on to any of the climate change terrorists, or the extreme left wing BBC, but our last two days of great storms, can’t be blamed on “man-made global warming” nor on Brexit.

Burchardi flood October 11, 1634.

The Burchardi flood (also known as the second Grote Mandrenke) was a storm tide that struck the North Sea coast of North Frisia and Dithmarschen (in modern-day Germany) on the night between 11 and 12 October 1634. Overrunning dikes, it shattered the coastline and caused thousands of deaths (8,000 to 15,000 people drowned) and catastrophic material damage. Much of the island of Strand washed away, forming the islands Nordstrand, Pellworm and several Halligen.

----While the weather had been calm for weeks prior to the flood, a strong storm occurred from the east on the evening of 11 October 1634[2] which turned southwest during the evening and developed into a European windstorm from the northwest. The most comprehensive report is preserved from Dutch hydraulic engineer Jan Leeghwater who was tasked with land reclamation in a part of the Dagebüll bay. He writes:[3]



Leeghwater ----and his son fled over the dike towards a manor which was situated on higher terrain while the water had almost reached the top of the dike. At the time there were 38 persons in that manor, 20 of whom were refugees from lower lands. He continues:[4]





ssspring tide, the wind was pushing the water against the coastline with such a force that the first dike broke in the Stintebüll parish on Strand island at 10 p.m. About two hours past midnight the water had reached its peak level. Contemporary reports write of a water level on the mainland of ca. 4 metres (13 ft) above mean high tide, which is only slightly below the all-time highest flood level that was recorded at Husum during the 1976 flood with 4.11 metres (13 ft) above mean high tide.[citation needed]
 
The water rose so high that not only were the dikes destroyed but also houses in the shallow marshlands and even those on artificial dwelling hills were flooded. Some houses collapsed while others were set on fire due to unattended fireplaces.
More

For real science on the subject of changing the global economy, Google:

THE “NEW ENERGY ECONOMY”: AN EXERCISE IN MAGICAL THINKING

"This daunting challenge elicits a common response: “If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can [fill in the blank with any aspirational goal].” But transforming the energy economy is not like putting a few people on the moon a few times. It is like putting all of humanity on the moon—permanently."


Technology Update.
With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported. Is converting sunlight to usable cheap AC or DC energy mankind’s future from the 21st century onwards?

Graphene substrate improves the conductivity of carbon nanotube network

Date: October 9, 2019

Source: Aalto University

Summary: Scientists have combined graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes into a transparent hybrid material with conductivity higher than either component exhibits separately. 

Transparent conductive films (TCFs) have many applications in touch screens, organic light emitting diodes and solar cells. These applications need materials that are strong, energy efficient and stable, which is why companies and researchers are interested in carbon-based materials. This applies especially to networks of single-walled carbon nanotubes, which are expected to replace the metal-oxide films that are currently used.

Graphene is the thinnest imaginable material, it is just one atomic layer of carbon atoms. Rolling this into a cylinder makes a carbon nanotube, which is better suited to carrying electricity in real-world applications. In an article published in ACS Nano, scientists at Aalto University and the University of Vienna introduce a hybrid material made by combining carbon nanotubes and graphene, which improves the conductivity of the film beyond what is possible when using each of these component structures separately.

Professor Kauppinen's group at Aalto has years of experience in making carbon nanotubes for TCFs. This new work applies the techniques they have developed to place densely-packed and clean random nanotube networks on graphene. "This is another application of the technologies we have developed over the past decades. Put simply, this work is about how the two materials are put together without solvents," Kauppinen explains.

In the study, the scientists used a process called thermophoresis to deposit nanotubes on prefabricated graphene electrodes. The hybrid films' conductivities were roughly twice as high as predicted.

The experiments conducted by the team at the University of Vienna, led by Jani Kotakoski, showed that the strong electrical interactions of graphene enhanced the flow of electrons between the nanotubes by encouraging charge-tunneling. The team used a scanning transmission electron microscope to look at the material on the scale of individual atoms, and saw that the van der Waals interaction between the graphene and nanotubes was strong enough to collapse the circular nanotube bundles into flat ribbons.

The lead scientist from the Vienna group, Kimmo Mustonen, explains: "This is really an ingenious approach. The charge transport in nanomaterials is very sensitive to any external factors. What you really want is to avoid unnecessary processing steps if your goal is to make the ideal conductive film." Mustonen adds, "It actually is quite remarkable. We of course knew that the interaction is quite strong. For instance, think of graphite; it is just a large number of graphene layers bound together by the same mechanism. Yet we did not expect that it has such a strong impact on conductivity."

The results provide opportunities to improve the conductivity of similar hybrid nanomaterials.
Another weekend and a weekend to ponder on what exactly happened in the trade talks in Washington, and to a lesser extent in the sudden Brexit optimism that developed on Thursday. Was a real breakthrough achieved on either problem, or is it all just more talk and spin? Punditry is going to have a stellar weekend. Have a great weekend everyone.
“One of the key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace. Good people don’t go into government.”
Donald J. Trump.

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished September

DJIA: 26,917 +57 Up. NASDAQ: 7,999 +62 Up. SP500: 2,977 +61 Up.

Another inconclusive month, but all three moved up weakly.   I would not rely on nor take such a weak buy signal.

No comments:

Post a Comment