Baltic Dry Index. 1748 +28 Brent Crude 58.53
Spot Gold 1497
Never ending Brexit now October 31,
maybe. 82 days away.
Trump’s Nuclear China Tariffs
Now In Effect.
USA v EU trade war postponed to
November, maybe.
Somebody has to be on the other side.
George
Goodman, aka Adam Smith. The Money Game. Why Are The Little People Always
Wrong?
Who will win the trade and currency wars?
Will there be any winners? How will we recognise a winner? How much collateral
damage can the global economy take before there’s a general collapse?
If a new recession starts or is already
underway, when the over priced stock markets start to fall, how much “goodwill”
must be written off falling stocks?
Will a no deal Brexit push the rump-EU
into recession? Will a rump-EU recession drag the rest of the world into
recession, including Trump’s USA?
If the USA economy falls into recession
in a presidential election year, will the Federal Reserve follow the ECB and
Bank of Japan into a gamble on negative interest rates? If they do, where will
gold and silver eventually top out?
We are living in interesting and very
uncertain times.
David Rosenberg: Here are ten reasons you should take risk off the table right now
From the Fed to bonds to tariffs to all the global uncertainty, it's time to make some major portfolio changes — now
All the positive forces that propelled the equity markets earlier this year have fallen off the table. There’s been no trade deal with China, no smooth Brexit and the Fed pivot was less than it seemed. Little wonder the S&P 500 is coming off its worst stretch of the year. With signs that more trouble is brewing, here are 10 reasons to take risk off the table, and I recommend you don’t wait around.1. Tariff Man
We know what the recent past has taught us, which is that the stock market corrects hard in the aftermath of these Trump tariff threats and actions. If you recall, the initial round of tariffs came in early 2018 and that touched off a major correction in the market. The next round in September 2018 (10 per cent on US$200 billion) triggered a near-20-per-cent slide. And after the tariff boost to 25 per cent, we saw a 6.6 per cent setback in the S&P 500 in May. This latest threat to raise tariffs 10 per cent on the other US$300 billion of Chinese exports to the U.S. is a real game-changer because, unlike the previous 25 per cent hike on US$250 billion, this move will affect consumer products that U.S. households buy — the consumer was largely immune before. The notion that only China will pay for this is either a misguided comment from the White House or just another in the long list of outright untruths. Despite what the likes of Donald Trump and Larry Kudlow say, both economies are getting hurt.
2. The Fed’s flip flop
The Fed has constantly bungled its communications with the market and has flip-flopped in a manner I have not seen in more than 30 years as a market economist. After Jay Powell did everything to convince investors this was not going to be anything more than a mid-cycle policy adjustment, Mr. Market is saying, “Sorry, but you’re wrong once again” — and pricing in 100 per cent odds of a September move and a 90 per cent chance for two more cuts by year-end. There is this growing view among economists that the Fed shouldn’t be cutting rates because rate cuts are no antidote for the effects of rising trade tensions. It is a totally ridiculous argument because no central bank is going to maintain the same policy when its base-case GDP projection is hit with a negative demand shock.
That said, “pushing on a string” has been a pervasive theme of ours and has already come to fruition since such credit-sensitive aggregates as housing failed to respond to the bond-induced slide in mortgage rates.
3. Rolling the dice has become policy
The administration in the U.S. is making some major miscalculations, and rolling the dice now seems to be the favoured option. I’m not sure comments that “we will be taxing the hell out of China” are going to work because the Politburo fully realizes that without a deal, President Trump’s election chances take a hit — irrespective of who he ends up running against.
4. Beijing has more cards to play
China, in turn, is threatening retaliatory measures of its own. This is where the second-round negative economic impacts take hold. I cannot believe it when I hear pundits say that the U.S. has the upper hand because China has fewer imports it can raise tariffs on. That misses the point. China can ban tourism to the U.S., as it is doing now with Taiwan. China also can step up what it’s already doing to American companies with toeholds there — surprise inspections, shipment delays, licence rejections — and then there’s the big bomb: a boycott of American goods, or directing state-owned enterprises to cease their purchase of U.S. inputs. Think it through — China has plenty of options. There is no winner from a global trade war, period.
More
‘Befuddling’ Signals Whipsaw Stock Traders in Trump's Trade War
By Lu Wang and Elena Popina
Forgive
stock investors for feeling whipsawed. They just endured one of the wildest
weeks of the bull market only to see the S&P 500 end not far from where it
started.
The rapidly
escalating trade war bears the blame, sure, but that’s not going away anytime
soon. What matters for financial markets is the impact on future growth, and
equity traders looking for guidance often turn to Treasuries. The problem there
is that bulls and bears can both find succor.
----“It’s more than just a concern about tariffs, it’s a concern about a global slowdown. Then the question becomes, would a significant rate cut by the Fed staunch it?” said Quincy Krosby, chief market strategist at Prudential Financial Inc. “What you want is investors taking advantage of lower stock prices. But if you keep thinking, ‘it’s going to get lower,’ you’ll keep your cash.”
The S&P 500 slipped 0.5% over the five days, suffering the year’s worst rout Monday and another modest drop Friday. Sandwiched in between was the biggest three-day rally in two months. Trade headlines caused the ructions, and quant traders and balanced funds accounted for some of the intraweek gyrations, but in the end, investors were left to handicap whether the economy can withstand a level of global policy uncertainty that’s near a record.
“It has been treacherous to even dip your toe into the water,” said Peter Tchir, head of macro strategy at Academy Securities. “This pattern of large, rapid moves, sometimes in reaction to headlines, and even more befuddling, sometimes occurring with no obvious headline in sight has created an environment where it is extremely difficult to trade or manage risk.”
After Monday’s rout, equity bulls went off to the weekend pleased the S&P 500 sits just 3.5% below an all-time high reached 10 sessions ago. Much of their optimism is based on relative valuations. Among 22 Wall Street strategists tracked by Bloomberg, more than half have cut their profit forecasts for the S&P 500 since the start of May, but none lowered their year-end price targets. Lower rates make stocks look more attractive, they say.
Indeed, with a record $15 trillion of global bonds yielding less than zero, the S&P 500 can hardly be framed as expensive when companies hand out dividends equivalent to 1.9% of their share prices. For the first time since 2016, the equity benchmark’s payout exceeded the 10-year Treasury yield.
More
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-09/-befuddling-signals-whipsaw-stock-traders-in-trump-s-trade-war?srnd=premium-europe
No comments:
Post a Comment