Friday, 15 June 2018

USA v The World. Russia 5 Saudi Arabia 0.


Baltic Dry Index. 1433 +29     Brent Crude 75.89

There can be few fields of human endeavour in which history counts for so little as in the world of finance. Past experience, to the extent that it is part of memory at all, is dismissed as the primitive refuge of those who do not have the insight to appreciate the incredible wonders of the present.

J. K. Galbraith.

And so it started, as Russia trashed Saudi Arabia 5 – 0 in the opening game of the World Cup, with much of the world watching, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had approved 50 billion of tariffs on Chinese goods, details next week in the Federal Register. China said it will retaliate.

And with that the USA starts its global trade war with all except Bhutan, the Faroe Isles and Iceland. Nothing good emerges at the end of this global trade war between the world’s biggest debtor and its biggest creditors.

Below, as Trump pursues economic madness, Mario Draghi at the ECB, said I’ll have apiece of that action, and promptly promised to keep the ECB rates low for another year, sparking a large devaluation of the euro against the dollar, and a new round in the beggar thy neighbour currency war. Shame about all those emerging market dollar debts!

Below, de ja vu with summer 1987, and the US Treasury’s fight with Germany. This time round everything is much bigger and far worse. From gargantuan, unrepayable debt to matching egos, to massive and rapidly rising political instability, to a long in the tooth weak global recovery, to the lunatics in Washington this is the perfect time to kick it all off.

With trade wars, nothing seems to happen at first, unless Trump starts imposing tariffs on auto imports when the sky would start to fall almost immediately. In the early stage of a trade war, firms have largely stockpiled, and work through inventory. But as the difficulties and costs start to mount, and warm summer turns into frostier autumn, bad things and bad attitudes will start to appear.

Nothing is so admirable in politics as a short memory.

John Kenneth Galbraith.

Trump OKs around $50 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods

Published: June 14, 2018 8:16 p.m. E

Trade fight ratchets up; unclear when tariffs will take effect

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump approved tariffs on about $50 billion of Chinese goods, people familiar with the decision said, as the U.S. ratchets up its trade fight with Beijing over China’s alleged pressure on U.S. firms to transfer technology to Chinese partners.

The approval followed a 90-minute meeting on Thursday of senior White House officials, national-security officials and senior representatives of the Treasury, Commerce Department, U.S. Trade Representative’s Office.

It wasn’t clear when the tariffs would go into effect. Beijing has said that it intends to assess tariffs on a corresponding amount of U.S. goods.

USTR expects to announce the goods subject to tariffs on Friday and publish them in the Federal Register next week, the people familiar with the matter said. The affected imports would face 25% tariffs; the products are expected to be similar to those on a preliminary list that USTR released in early April.

June 15, 2018 / 2:37 AM

Asian shares falter as U.S. readies China tariffs, euro at two-week low on ECB

TOKYO (Reuters) - Asian shares wobbled on Friday as investors braced for U.S. tariffs against China, while the euro flirted with two-week lows after a cautious European Central Bank indicated it would not raise interest rates for some time.

U.S. President Donald Trump has made up his mind to impose “pretty significant” tariffs and will unveil a list targeting $50 billion of Chinese goods on Friday, an administration official said. Beijing has warned that it was ready to respond.[nL1N1TG05L]

While it is not clear when Trump will activate the measures, rising Sino-U.S. trade tensions will put additional pressure on China’s economy, which is starting to show signs of cooling under the weight of a multi-year crackdown on riskier lending.[nL4N1TG2ME]

Analysts said that although the expected announcement would likely not be a total surprise to markets — an initial list was released by Washington a few months ago — it would still make investors concerned that the window for averting a trade war may be closing.

The Asia Pacific MSCI index ex-Japan .MIAPJ0000PUS edged down 0.3 percent, with many regional markets shrugging off a strong close on Wall Street. But Japan's Nikkei average .N225 and Australian shares advanced 0.3 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively.

“The implementation of tariffs on China is one of several fronts that the U.S. is battling on the issue of trade,” said Tai Hui, chief APAC market strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, referring to the Trump administration’s tough stance toward Canada and Europe.

“This battleground could potentially expand into the auto sector given the U.S. investigation into auto imports. This is likely to weigh on market sentiment over the summer.”

The euro EUR= was headed for its worst weekly loss in 19 months after the ECB signalled on Thursday it will keep interest rates at record lows into at least mid-2019, even as it pledged to end its massive bond purchase scheme by the end of this year.

The common currency shed 1.9 percent to the dollar after the rate comments, in its sharpest daily fall in almost two years since Brexit vote shock in 2016.
More

15 June 2018, 05:01 GMT+1

The EU Is Emerging as the New Sheriff for Global Financial Markets

From its Chicago headquarters, CME Group Inc. offers options, swaps, and futures contracts designed to help investors mitigate the potential fallout from, say, a failed gold mine in Africa, a spike in Mexican interest rates, or an oil spill in the North Sea. Today the company itself faces growing risk from an unexpected quarter: Brussels.

European Union regulators are seeking greater influence over the supervision of financial companies, including those based in the U.S., such as CME, and in the U.K. once Britain leaves the bloc. The EU is proposing that clearinghouses—financial middlemen—in the region undergo inspections by European supervisors and be required to respond to the European Central Bank in emergencies.
Those rules present “grave concerns,” says Sunil Cutinho, president of CME Clearing, who on June 6 told industry executives in London that the EU’s growing reach threatens a long-standing practice of deferring to oversight in a company’s home country. “There was a time when regulators trusted each other,” Cutinho said, echoing calls by CME’s main regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, for the EU to rely on cooperation with U.S. authorities.

As the U.S. rolls back regulations enacted after the 2008 crisis, the EU is emerging as the new sheriff for international markets. Europe is introducing standards for everything from investment research to trading to oversight of client data—rules with repercussions from New York to Hong Kong.

When the EU introduced its General Data Protection Regulation last month, Facebook Inc. and Microsoft Corp. said they’ll largely adhere to the directive everywhere they operate, not just in Europe. Anu Bradford, a professor at Columbia University’s law school, calls it the “Brussels effect.” Multinationals complying with European regulations to gain access to the region’s €15 trillion economy sometimes find it’s cheaper and easier to implement a blanket global policy. “The EU has become more self-conscious of its ability to set international standards and is embracing that opportunity,” Bradford says.

New EU guidelines give authorities in Brussels greater sway over regulations made by watchdogs in other countries. For foreign companies to do business in the EU without setting up a subsidiary in the bloc, they and their home country typically need a so-called equivalence finding. These rulings from the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, assess whether foreign statutes are sufficiently strong to protect European consumers and corporations. As the clock ticked down to the January start of the EU’s revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or MiFID II, brokerages warned of a rupture in global markets if the EU were to find that other countries’ laws weren’t tough enough.

----The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had to take emergency action to limit the impact of MiFID II after American companies warned that a key part of the law would threaten their investment research business. The U.S. bars Wall Street brokers from accepting payments for research, but MiFID II requires money managers to pay separately for research and trading services. The SEC said it would suspend enforcement of its rule for some investors in Europe while it assesses the impact.
More

Finally, haven’t we been here before? My advice to missing German Lillevyalli, stay away from door handles.

It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his money.

Wall Street Adage, with apologies to W. C. Fields

Moscow Financier Goes AWOL as Global Clients Hunt for Millions

It was an unseasonably warm December evening in the Russian capital and spirits were high inside Sixty, a restaurant atop a skyscraper overlooking the Moscow River where vintage Krug pops at $1,000 a bottle.
By Ksenia Galouchko and Hugo Miller
14 June 2018, 09:03 GMT+1

It was an unseasonably warm December evening in the Russian capital and spirits were high inside Sixty, a restaurant atop a skyscraper overlooking the Moscow River where vintage Krug pops at $1,000 a bottle.

Employees of the GL network of companies were cheering as their boss, German Lillevyali, showered them with golden Oscar replicas, 10,000-euro debit cards to shop in Milan and, for his very best performer, a $70,000 car.

Six months on, there’s nothing left to celebrate.

Lillevyali, a serial entrepreneur who’s dabbled in everything from vodka to health care, has left Russia , the money-raising hub of his GL Financial Group, a Swiss- and U.K.-licensed asset manager with affiliates in Moscow, Zurich, Geneva, London, Cyprus and Belize.

The financier, who was managing at least $250 million of assets at the end of last year according to two former subordinates, seems to be in Cyprus. A Facebook message seeking to calm investors was posted under his name on April 20, purportedly from the island nation.

“I promise you the money is safe,” it said. “I will return it personally, there is nothing to worry about.”

That might have reassured European, U.S. and Asian clients trying to get their money back as GL workers quit, offices closed and phone lines went dead. Except Lillevyali says the Facebook post from Cyprus was fake, deepening the mystery of their missing millions. Disgruntled clients include an executive who works for billionaire Oleg Deripaska, top managers at Swiss drugmaker Novartis AG and San Francisco-based Levi Strauss & Co., and even a professional soccer goalie.

This story of GL Financial’s unraveling, which is being scrutinized by regulators in Britain and Switzerland, has been pieced together from interviews with eight clients and former employees. They requested anonymity either because they don’t want to jeopardize efforts to retrieve their savings or because they fear for their physical safety.

Calls and messages to the numbers listed for GL Financial and related companies weren’t returned or went to voicemail. When Bloomberg reached Lillevyali himself via WhatsApp on Wednesday and Thursday, he declined to identify his current location three times, saying he’s not ready to play “the anti-hero.”

Lillevyali rejected any suggestion that he lost or is withholding client funds. He said the most he ever had under management was about $140 million and that about $35 million belonging to about 30 people is now frozen, mainly due to “compliance issues” related to sanctions. U.S. and European sanctions only apply to a few dozen Russians, none of whom are known clients. He said “a large number” of customers are getting repaid, though he didn’t name any.

“It’s like a bad movie,” said one customer angry at what he described as being stonewalled for months.

In an online interview last year, Lillevyali said he’d developed a “radically new approach” to investing that’s based on artificial intelligence, “complex algorithms” and “integrated processing.” The Swiss website of GL Asset Management, which expounded on this strategy, was taken down this month.

In his last confirmed Twitter post, on Feb. 9,  Lillevyali urged investors to study chess. He’s repeatedly boasted of having beaten former world chess champion Anatoly Karpov, one of the highest-rated grandmasters ever. Karpov’s assistant in Moscow said she couldn’t confirm or deny that claim.
More

Never give a sucker an even break.

Wall Street Adage, with apologies to W. C. Fields

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

Today food for thought. Do America and Russia really need 7,000 nuclear bombs each?

Only 100 nuclear bombs needed to cause catastrophe around the world

Henry Bodkin, The TelegraphJune 13, 2018
Nations with huge nuclear arsenals are wasting their money because just 100 missiles would be enough to destabilise the globe and kill their own citizens, scientists have said.

Britain currently possesses approximately 215 warheads of around 15,000 worldwide, the vast majority of which are American or Russian.

But researchers have determined that no nation could fire more than 100 without causing a chain of events so catastrophic the impacts are felt at home.

In the first such exercise of its kind, scientists analysed the “environmental blow-back” of a one-way but massive nuclear strike.

Based on models including those of burnable materials in cities, they calculated the amount of soot and dust that would be thrown into the air by the blasts, the consequent blotting of the sun and damage to the atmosphere.

They found that the “nuclear autumn” of such destruction would damage agricultural output by up to 20 per cent, enough to affect widespread food shortages even on the other side of the world.

The concept of nuclear deterrence has traditionally included the doctrine that the bigger the arsenal, the less likely an adversary is to attack.

However, the authors at Michigan Technological University and Tennessee State University say there is no “pragmatic” reason for any nation to maintain more than 100.

Published in the journal Safety, the study follows the historic Singapore summit between President Trump and Kim Jong Un, where both leaders pledged the “complete denucliarisation” of the Korean peninsula.

There are nine official nuclear weaponised nations: the U.S., Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea.

Britain’s nuclear deterrent consists of at least one of four nuclear-armed submarines being at sea and ready to launch at any time.

Although both the Conservative and Labour Parties are officially committed to renewing Trident, Jeremy Corbyn has expressed a preference to scrap it.

Under the disarmament proposed in the  new study, the total number of warheads globally would drop to 900 or fewer.

Professor Joshua Pearce, one of the authors, said: “With 100 nuclear weapons, you still get nuclear deterrence, but avoid the probable blowback from nuclear autumn that kills your own people."

"No country should have more nuclear weapons than the number necessary for unacceptable levels of environmental blow-back on the nuclear power's own country if they were used."

Professor Pearce said modeling showed that if the US were to fire 1,000 nuclear warheads, 50-times more Americans would die than did on 9/11, even if no missiles were fired back.
More
Technology Update.
With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported. Is converting sunlight to usable cheap AC or DC energy mankind’s future from the 21st century onwards?

Physicists discover how to create the thinnest liquid films ever

Date: June 12, 2018

Source: University of Vermont

Summary: Physicists have discovered a fundamentally new way surfaces can get wet. Their study may allow scientists to create the thinnest films of liquid ever made -- and engineer a new class of surface coatings and lubricants just a few atoms thick.

A team of physicists at the University of Vermont have discovered a fundamentally new way surfaces can get wet. Their study may allow scientists to create the thinnest films of liquid ever made -- and engineer a new class of surface coatings and lubricants just a few atoms thick.

"We've learned what controls the thickness of ultra-thin films grown on graphene," says Sanghita Sengupta, a doctoral student at UVM and the lead author on the new study. "And we have a good sense now of what conditions -- like knobs you can turn -- will change how many layers of atoms will form in different liquids."

The results were published June 8 in the journal Physical Review Letters.

 A THIRD WAY

To understand the new physics, imagine what happens when rain falls on your new iPhone: it forms beads on the screen. They're easy to shake off. Now imagine your bathroom after a long shower: the whole mirror may be covered with a thin layer of water. "These are two extreme examples of the physics of wetting," says UVM physicist Adrian Del Maestro, a co-author on the new study. "If interactions inside the liquid are stronger than those between the liquid and surface, the liquid atoms stick together, forming separate droplets. In the opposite case, the strong pull of the surface causes the liquid to spread, forming a thin film."

More than 50 years ago, physicists speculated about a third possibility -- a strange phenomena called "critical wetting" where atoms of liquid would start to form a film on a surface, but then would stop building up when they were just a few atoms thick. These scientists in the 1950s, including the famed Soviet physicist Evgeny Lifshitz, weren't sure if critical wetting was real, and they certainly didn't think it would ever be able to be seen in the laboratory.

Then, in 2010, the Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to two Russian scientists for their creation of a bizarre form of carbon called graphene. It's a honeycombed sheet of carbon just one atom thick. It's the strongest material in the world and has many quirky qualities that materials scientists have been exploring ever since.

Graphene turns out to be the "ideal surface to test for critical wetting," says Del Maestro -- and with it the Vermont team has now demonstrated mathematically that critical wetting is real.

----Much of the initial promise of graphene as an industrial product has not yet been realized. Part of the reason why is that many of its special properties -- like being a remarkably efficient conductor -- go away when thick layers of other materials are stuck to it. But with the control of critical wetting, engineers might be able to customize nanoscale coatings which wouldn't blot out the desired properties of graphene, but could, says Adrian Del Maestro, offer lubrication and protection of "next-generation wearable electronics and displays."
More

Another weekend and the first of the World Cup weekends in Russia. For those with long memories, the CIA has a way of using such events to stir up trouble, and wars. From colour revolutions to wars. Georgia attacking Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia during the China Olympics in 2008. The botched Kiev coup in the winter Olympics in Russia in 2014. And now, another Novichok door handle attack, or another unverified gas attack in Syria? With a month still to go in the world cup, stay tuned.  Of course, it could just be coincidence. Have a great weekend everyone.

"Get a good night's sleep and don't bug anybody without asking me."

Richard M. Nixon, 37th President, to John Mitchell, 1972,  head of CreeP,  the Committee to Re-elect the President.

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished May.

DJIA: 24,416 +201 Down. NASDAQ: 7,442 +276 Down. SP500: 2,705 +180 Down.
All three slow indicators moved down in March and have continued down in April and May. For some a new bear signal, for others a take profits and get back to cash signal

No comments:

Post a Comment