Saturday, 3 March 2018

Weekend Update 03/03/2018 The Weekend Pause.



It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy...What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom.

 Adam Smith, The Wealth Of Nations, 1776

This weekend the world stands at a crossroads. To go down a trade war road, as President Trump says he will do next week, or to reach some sort of compromise and continue on the main path of global integration.  It is highly improbable that President Trump will back down from the corner he put himself in. This weekend our world seems headed for a trade war to add to the existing currency war. A development the world hasn’t seen since the 1930s.

Below, one last weekend to save the global economy from self harm.

March 2, 2018 / 3:09 AM

'Trade wars are good,' Trump says, defying global concern over tariffs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump struck a defiant tone on Friday, saying trade wars were good and easy to win, after his plan to put tariffs on steel and aluminium imports triggered threats of retaliation from trading partners and a slide in stock markets.

The European Union raised the possibility of taking countermeasures, France said the duties would be unacceptable, and China urged Trump to show restraint. Canada, the biggest supplier of steel and aluminium to the United States, said it would retaliate if hit by U.S. tariffs.

The S&P 500 ended another turbulent week on an upbeat note Friday but major indexes posted their worst week of losses since early February as Trump’s threat to impose import tariffs on steel and aluminium rattled investors. The dollar fell against most currencies, dropping to its lowest in more than two years against the yen, as Trump’s tariffs proposal raised prospects of a damaging trade war.

Trump said on Thursday that a plan for tariffs of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminium products would be formally announced next week.
More

March 2, 2018 / 5:55 PM / Updated 13 hours ago

Canada PM warns of market disruption from U.S. steel tariffs

(Reuters) - Canada’s Prime Minister said on Friday any U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium imports would cause significant disruption to markets on both sides of the border, but he was confident his government could defend the industry.
Any disruption to this integrated market would be significant and serious. But that is why we were impressing upon the American administration the unacceptable nature of these proposals that are going to hurt them every bit as much as they are going to hurt us, and we are confident we’re going to continue to be able to defend Canadian industry,” Trudeau told reporters at a news conference in Barrie, Ontario.

March 2, 2018 / 9:06 PM

FOR THE WEEK, THE S&P 500 FELL 2 PCT, THE DOW FELL 3 PCT, NASDAQ FELL 1 PCT

Trump’s tariffs mean higher prices — and maybe even beer in plastic bags

Published: Mar 2, 2018 8:15 a.m. ET
The stock market is stumbling toward a sizable weekly loss, whacked in large part by trade-war fears.
President Trump has “shocked the markets with a regressive, counter-productive and possibly destructive tariff plan for aluminum and steel,” complains Josh “The Reformed Broker” Brown.
Canada, the European Union and China (well, the Chinese steel industry, at least) have come out swinging in response, and Trump is fanning the flames for a battle in trade:

At least the weekend is coming. You can kick back with a beer — no one will ever mess with that, right? Uh-oh.

That’s the worried message from GQ writer Luke Darby and the Midwest Food Processors Association’s Nick George, who combine for our call of the day.

The fallout from these tariffs could be tremendous, including rising prices, layoffs and beer coming in plastic bags like Canadian milk,” says Darby.

He’s suggesting brewers will raise prices for six packs if they have to pay more for aluminum cans, as he also jokes that they’ll switch to using plastic bags. (Yes, many Canadians buy milk by the bag.)

The tariffs “definitely could raise prices” for consumers, says George, president of the Midwest Food Processors Association, according to a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report.

They’re part of a horde of people worried about the potential impact on the big users of aluminum and steel. There’s buzz about Hershey Kisses, cars, Apple Macbooks and other beloved goods possibly costing more.
More

Hedge fund boss who predicted the 1987 stock crash warns of a selloff in bonds

Published: Mar 2, 2018 7:06 a.m. ET
Paul Tudor Jones expects the 10-year yield to hit 3.75% by the end of 2018
Paul Tudor Jones, a hedge-fund icon, said investors should steer clear of bonds as he considers government paper “overvalued and overowned” and primed for a tumble.

That’s a scenario that would drive yields, which move in the opposite direction of prices, sharply higher. Jones is predicting the yield for the 10-year Treasury note TMUBMUSD10Y, +0.29% will hit 3.75% by the end of 2018. Yields stand presently at 2.81%.

Jones is widely credited with predicting, and profiting, from the stock-market crash in October of 1987, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -1.68% lose 22% of its value, marking the largest percentage decline for the blue-chip benchmark in its history. Jones founded Tudor in 1980 and became known for trading everything from currencies to commodities. His track record has featured middling returns and an exodus of billions from his hedge fund in more recent years.
Jones told Goldman Sachs — for a research report dated Wednesday and titled “Has a bond bear market begun? — that a coming bear market in bonds is the result of easy-money policies that has set the stage for out-of-control inflation:

The bear market in bonds is the natural upshot of the bull market in monetary and fiscal laxity... We are setting the stage for accelerating inflation, just as we did in the late ‘60s.

The Fed’s dogged pursuit of a 2% annual target for inflation, the level the central bank views as healthy for the economy, is setting the stage for a “sharp spike in inflation, created financial bubbles on the verge of popping, and enabled the recent U.S. fiscal stimulus, which [Jones] thinks we will regret,” the Goldman note said.
More

In other news this weekend, misery loves company.  Bitcoin’s internals signal all’s not right in the bitcoin mania.  Europe seems to want to blow even before President Trump adds a trade war to his currency war.

Bitcoin's Plunge in Volume Stirs Questions About Its Popularity

By Eddie Van Der Walt
2 March 2018, 07:45 GMT
Earlier this year, when Bitcoin’s price fell by more than 60 percent from its record close, a less-noticed Bitcoin figure also plunged: the number of daily transactions.
There are many explanations for the fall-off in trading, from software- to news-related. What’s less understood is why the level hasn’t recovered as Bitcoin’s price made a 50 percent comeback since Feb. 5. That’s left some investors wondering whether the cryptocurrency is waning in popularity.
The average number of trades recorded daily has roughly dropped in half from the December highs and touched its lowest in two years last month, even as Bitcoin became a household name and roared back above $10,000.
The transaction data may be bad news for Bitcoin bulls, according to Charles Morris, chief investment officer of Newscape Capital Group in London, who invests in cryptocurrencies. Trading and purchases on the Bitcoin network, which can be measured by metrics like transaction volume, is indicative of price direction, he said.
“We had a hype-cycle and now it’s cooling down,” Morris, who’s working on a project that will facilitate price discovery in various cryptocurrencies, said by phone from London. “We just may be entering a bear market” for Bitcoin.
Transactions plunged from a seven-day average of almost 400,000 in mid-December to about 200,000 this week, according to research firm Blockchain.info. The last time it was this low, the currency traded below $500.
Transactions waiting to be officially recognized by the Bitcoin network dropped from a seven-day average of 130 million bytes in early January to about 35 million now.
----The decline in prices may itself be to blame for lower trading volumes in Bitcoin. And websites that once only allowed payment in Bitcoin now accept a much wider range of digital currencies, according to Kyle Samani, managing partner at crypto hedge fund Multicoin Capital. That makes alternative currencies more appealing than the first-mover in the space. A year ago, bitcoin’s market capitalization was about 85 percent of the total sector. It’s now around 40 percent, according to website Coinmarketcap.com.
“Merchants, payment processors and online gambling are moving off of Bitcoin,” Samani, who has $50 million allocated to the space, said in an email. “Our Bitcoin position as a fund is small -- I believe Bitcoin is in the process of failing.”

Finally, Italy. A nice place to visit, a hell of a place to live, Vatican City excepted. Euros anyone?

Why Italy's Election Is Such a Mess

An interview with Hans Noel, a political scientist based in Florence.
by Jonathan Bernstein 2 March 2018, 07:00 GMT
No one knows what will happen when Italy votes on March 5 [March 4. Ed]. Polling is inconclusive, and the electoral rules are brand-new. In an attempt to make some sense of the mess of parties and coalitions competing for power, I reached out (over email) to Hans Noel, an associate professor of government at Georgetown University and author of “Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America,” a study of coalition-building and elections. He is spending the year as faculty-in-residence at Villa Le Balze in Florence.

JONATHAN BERNSTEIN: Is Italy likely to come out of this election with any stable government at all?

HANS NOEL: As you know, I’m out of the prediction business, but no. Italy is very likely to come out of this election without a stable government at all. The problem is that there will be three factions with about a third of the vote. The center-right, a coalition that is itself divided roughly in half between Forza Italia and Lega, is likely to come in first, but they will need a coalition partner. The Five-Star Movement, which likely to be the single biggest party, but behind the center-right coalition, has generally said they don’t want to join with the other parties at all. It’s hard to see them align with anyone. The center-left coalition, led by the Partito Democratico, will be the smallest, but they are also the most centrist.

So one likely outcome is a coalition between the PD and Forza Italia (and some minor parties), perhaps led by the current PM, Gentiloni. That is, a continuation of the existing caretaker government. A grand coalition like that one probably won’t last long. FI and PD just have goals that are too different. Other grand coalitions would seem just as unstable. Any coalition with the M5S seems very hard to predict, since their platform keeps shifting.

JB: That would seem to make it difficult for anyone trying to guess what kinds of policies, especially economic policies, to expect going forward. If it is a grand coalition including the PD, does that mean a continuation of the status quo on Europe and other economic policy for as long as the coalition lasts?

HN: Definitely hard to predict. One stabilizing force is that even Forza Italia is more moderate on Europe than most of its coalition. So if PD and FI are in the coalition, they may put the brakes on any kind of reduced relationship with Europe, under whatever nickname we’d give it. The Lega and (probably) M5S would like to see less deference to Europe, as they see it. But unless it’s a coalition of those two (not out of the question), then someone will likely hold them back for the time being.

Some are suggesting that an unstable grand coalition will lead to new elections very soon. If another election is on the horizon, then major policy change will probably be on hold.
More

March 2, 2018 / 12:20 PM

Polish lawmaker: due reparations from Germany could stand at $850 billion

WARSAW (Reuters) - Warsaw has the right to demand reparations from Germany potentially worth $850 billion (616.34 billion pounds) for destroyed property and people killed during World War Two, the politician in charge of reparations said on Friday.

The Polish ruling Law and Justice party (PiS) has revived the issue of war reparations at a time when Israeli politicians accuse it of attempting to whitewash the role of Poles in German war crimes against Jews during the conflict.

German parliamentary legal experts said last year that Warsaw had no right to demand reparations.
The Polish government stopped short of making a direct claim to Germany but the issue could lead to tensions between the two EU governments, analysts say. Germany is Poland’s largest trade partner and Poland is the biggest recipient of EU aid.

“We are talking about very large but justified sums for war crimes, for the destroyed cities, the lost demographic potential of our country,” Arkadiusz Mularczyk, the head of the parliamentary committee on reparations, told Polsat News broadcaster.

Mularczyk said the value of reparations due from Germany could reach $850 billion but this sum could be revised as new estimates would be made later this year.

The PiS lawmaker said Poland, which came under Soviet domination for more than four decades after the war, never received war reparations from Germany.
More

March 2, 2018 / 10:12 AM

Euro zone bonds sailing into weekend of risk events

LONDON (Reuters) - Germany’s 10-year government bond yield hit a five-week low on Friday, as an Italian election and a milestone in German coalition politics this Sunday together with worries about a global trade war boosted demand for safe-haven debt.

Italian bond yields fell to a three-week low, pushing the gap over German peers to its tightest in two weeks and suggesting some confidence among investors heading into Sunday’s election.

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday announced plans for hefty tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to protect U.S. producers. That stoked concerns about a trade war, rattling stock markets and pushing U.S. and European bond yields down.

The worries sparked a broad sell-off in European stocks, weighing particularly on the export-oriented German DAX index, which fell 1.8 percent to a six-month low.

In the euro zone, the focus turned to two potentially major risk events this weekend.

On Sunday, Italians vote in an election that is expected to result in a hung parliament, with former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi’s alliance of centre-right groups emerging as the largest bloc, while 5-Star looks certain to be the biggest single party.

Germany on Sunday gets the result of a ballot of Social Democrat (SPD) party members on a coalition deal with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives, the outcome of which could seal or end Merkel’s hopes for a fourth term in office.

“The base case we have is that we get through Italy with some sort of broad coalition that is market friendly, that Germany resolves its government situation and then there’s two years where some of the larger European questions can be solved,” said Mark Haefle, global chief investment officer at UBS Wealth Management.

Most euro zone bond yields were down 0-2 basis points.
More

March 2, 2018 / 10:10 AM

SPD coalition 'no' vote would hurt Germany, EU - party official

BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany and Europe would both suffer if the Social Democrats (SPD) vote‘no’ in a ballot on a coalition with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives, a senior party official said.
The SPD’s 464,000 members have been voting in a postal ballot on whether to endorse their party leadership’s decision to renew for another four years the‘grand coalition’ with Merkel’s conservative bloc that took office in 2013. The result is due on Sunday.

Stephan Weil, SPD premier of the state of Lower Saxony, said during his last visit to Brussels everyone he had spoken to was adamant Germany should not drift into uncertainty.

“It would be bad for Europe, Germany and the SPD. There would be a period of political uncertainty,” he said.

French President Emmanuel Macron is keen to push ahead with reforms to the euro zone, but without a German government in place soon the window of opportunity to inject fresh dynamism into the European project will quickly close for this year.

Asked in an interview with daily Die Welt if an SPD‘no’ vote would result in a national crisis, Weil said:“No, I wouldn’t go that far, but many people’s confidence in our political system would erode even further.”

The SPD’s Jusos youth wing has been lobbying party members to vote against a re-run of the grand coalition, arguing they would do better to rebuild in opposition after suffering a battering in last September’s election.
More

By means of glasses, hotbeds, and hotwalls, very good grapes can be raised in Scotland, and very good wine too can be made of them at about thirty times the expense for which at least equally good can be brought from foreign countries. Would it be a reasonable law to prohibit the importation of all foreign wines, merely to encourage the making of claret and burgundy in Scotland?

Adam Smith, The Wealth Of Nations, 1776.



And lastly,finally,  some interesting observations and comments from Jason Jencka in Lake Tahoe.

China Exceeds its 2017 Coal-Capacity Reduction Target as U.S. Coal & Natural Gas Consumption Fall Despite Trump Administration Rhetoric



N. Jason Jencka   March 3rd, 2018  3:02 am EST

It was a common refrain after the election of U.S. President Donald Trump that global efforts to reduce carbon emissions would be materially hampered as a result of a leadership vacuum resulting from Mr. Trump’s dismissive tone toward global climate change. Mr. Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S, from the 2015 Paris Climate Accords was seen as a “catastrophic” choice that would “imperil the planet” by a fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations in June of 2017. The theory was that loss of American leadership on the issue would lead to an international domino-effect of countries backpedaling upon their 2015 commitments such that the global emissions trajectory would be radically altered. Current developments demonstrate that these doomsday forecasts are not grounded in reality. Chinese news agency Xinhua announced on March 1st (per Reuters)  that China retired or suspended 65 gigawatts of coal-fired power capacity in 2017, exceeding its target of 50 GW by 30%. For purposes of context, the entire operating coal fleet of Germany was 50.8 GW as of July 2017.

Meanwhile, data from the U.S. EIA shows that despite campaign promises to end the perceived “War on Coal” of the Obama administration, American coal consumption fell 2.5% in 2017. Rival fossil fuel natural gas was not a beneficiary of this reduction as its consumption fell by a striking 7.7% due to higher prices and competition from renewable energy. The net effect of these data is to demonstrate that campaign rhetoric itself cannot overpower market forces. Energy policy in the U.S. continues to be primarily in the hands of utilities that must bend to the market reality that wind and solar energy are increasingly cost competitive and favored by consumers. Proof of this phenomenon lies in the fact that notoriously conservative and oil-driven Texas has more operational wind power than any other state at 22.6 GW from 12,494 turbines. While developments in energy markets and the resulting environmental implications are influenced by a variety of difficult-to predict factors such as weather, the fact remains that the idea of a Trump driven halt to global Co2 mitigation is, in his vernacular,  essentially “fake news.”

Sources:
Stewart M. Patrick-Council on Foreign Relations blog post June 1st, 2017: https://www.cfr.org/blog/trumps-catastrophic-climate-decision-imperils-planet-and-hastens-american-decline
U.S. Energy Information Administration: Electric Power Monthly: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_es1b
 

No comments:

Post a Comment