Showing posts with label UK climategate whitewash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UK climategate whitewash. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Euro – Too Big To Fail.

Baltic Dry Index. 2018 -109
LIR Gold Target by 2019: $3,000.

Why did I take up stealing? To live better, to own things I couldn't afford, to acquire this good taste that you now enjoy and which I should be very reluctant to give up.

George Papandreou, with apologies to Cary Grant. To Catch A Thief.

While the Baltic Dry Index fell for the 31st consecutive day yesterday, something completely ignored by global stock markets everywhere, busy betting that the BDI is not signaling a trade slowdown ahead, Dutch bank ING released a report on Euroland’s Frankenstein currency. The Euro, according to ING, is simply “too big to fail.” Like it or not, and most German taxpayers don’t like it at all, hardworking taxpaying German milch cows are now learning the truth about their new European one size fits all currency, they are trapped in it forever, according to ING. Germans will just have to get used to working harder for longer, to support the Club Med way of high life. With banks issuing dire reports like this, does anyone really think that Club Med countries will really stick to their austerity programs for years to come, transforming themselves into little Bavaria’s along the way? Just by coincidence, the Greeks are revolting again today. Yet another reason to stay long precious metals. Poor Eurolander’s are now mere pawns of their elitist overlords in seriously crooked Brussels, home of magical unauditable accounting.

"The great merit of gold is precisely that it is scarce; that its quantity is limited by nature; that it is costly to discover, to mine, and to process; and that it cannot be created by political fiat or caprice."

Henry Hazlitt

EMU break-up risks global deflation shock that would dwarf Lehman collapse, warns ING

A full-fledged disintegration of the eurozone would trigger the worst economic crisis in modern history, devastate every country in Europe including Germany, and inflict a deflationary shock on the US. There would be no winners, warns the Dutch bank ING in a new report "Quantifying the Unthinkable".

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Published: 6:55PM BST 07 Jul 2010

"Complete break-up would have effects that dwarf the post Lehman Brothers collapse. Governments would find themselves having to bail out banks again, worsening already fragile government finances. The risk of at least a temporary break-down in payments systems would be enormous, " said the report by Mark Cliffe, Maarten Leen, and Peter Vanden Houte.

"Initial trauma is sufficiently grave to give pause for thought to those who blithely propose EMU exit as a policy option," it said, a rebuke to those German politicians and economists who have talked openly of shaking out weaker members.

The new Greek drachma would crash by 80pc against the new Deutschemark. The currencies of Spain, Portugal, and Ireland would fall by 50pc or more, causing inflation to soar into double-digits. "The impact is dramatic and traumatic," it said.

ING has attempted to unpick the complex consequences of break-up scenarios, concluding that even a surgical exit by Greece alone would hurt everybody, and be suicidal for Greece. Both weak and strong states would suffer violent downturns if EMU unravelled altogether, though each in very different ways. "In the first year, output falls by between 5pc and 9pc across the various former member states," it said.

The German sphere would face a "deflationary shock". The US dollar would rocket to 85 cents against the euro equivalent, with a "temporary overshoot" to near 75 cents. This would tip the US into acute deflation, threatening North America with a double-dip recession. East Europe would contract 5pc in 2011 alone.

Safe-haven flows to core debt markets would drive down yields on 10-year US, German, and Dutch bonds to near 0.5pc, by far the lowest ever. Club Med yields would decouple brutally, rising to between 7pc and 12pc, "capital controls, notwithstanding."

This is the picture of a world falling apart. It is an outcome that Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, now seems determined to avoid, after dragging her feet over the Spring. The Bundestag has backed Germany's share of the €110bn rescue for Greece, and the €750bn EU-IMF bail-out for future casualties should they need it. The Bundesbank has lifted its de facto veto on purchases of Club Med bonds by the European Central Bank.

-----The markets perhaps sense that the bail-out battles in Germany are not yet over. There are four complaints lodged at the German constitutional court arguing that the rescues breach EU treaty law and therefore German basic law. While the court has refused an immediate injunction to block aid, it has not yet ruled on the cases.

A group of five professors has just expanded its original complaint against the Greek rescue to cover the EU's €440bn Stability Facility, describing the methods used to ram through the measures as "putschist" and anti-democratic. "This course is leading Germany to ruin," they said.

------ING's global strategist Mark Cliffe said any Anglo-Saxon Schadenfreude at a euro break-up would be short-lived. The UK economy would shrink by 4.5pc from 2011-2012. "It would be a very unpleasant experience," he said.

Safe-haven flows pouring into Britain would drive sterling through the roof. Eurozone demand for UK exports would contract viciously. Pension funds would suffer fat losses on eurozone assets. UK lenders would face havoc again though a web of cross-border linkages.

The Dutch bank does not make any judgement on the merits of EMU, or on whether it is an 'optimal currency area', nor does it explore half-way options such as a split into a hard Teutonic euro and a weak Latin euro.

The report said break-up talk is "no longer just a figment of fevered Anglo-Saxon imaginations". It has spread into top policy-making circles in the eurozone and must now be analysed as a serious tail-risk.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7877724/EMU-break-up-risks-global-deflation-shock-that-would-dwarf-Lehman-collapse-warns-ING.html

My guess is that ING and the 40 Brussels thieves notwithstanding, the whole Euroland fiat currency scam will still collapse at some point ahead, undone by the EU’s never ending expansionist policy, and the willingness of most socialist EU political parties to endlessly seek re-election by bribing the voters with other people’s money.

The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.

Margaret Thatcher.

Below, Club Med’s leader Napoleon Bling, hits the headlines again for all the wrong reasons. A legend in the Elysee Palace, the big man of France was second only to the UK’s former Prime Minister Tony Blair in fawning over billionaires and US Presidents for freebies. Note, this writer has no idea or not, whether Ms Bettencourt did or did not avoid paying French tax, nor whether she arranged to send over bungs to the Elysee Palace to help with the grocery bill.

"We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes."

Leona Helmsley.

French public anger grows at government sleaze allegations

When a poll this week found two thirds of French people consider their politicians "mostly corrupt", many were surprised at how low the figure was.

Peter Allen, in Paris Published: 9:45PM BST 07 Jul 2010

Suspicions about financial irregularities have plagued Nicolas Sarkozy's administration since he came to power in 2007 and immediately awarded himself a 140 per cent pay rise.

It prompted Arnaud Montebourg MP to say: "You get the feeling that the political class is helping itself while the French people are abandoned on the edge of the pavement."

Within days of being elected, Mr Sarkozy was enjoying a holiday on the luxury yacht of Vincent Bolloré, the wealthy businessman.

For an egalitarian conservative whose campaign slogan had been "Work more, to earn more" the cruise certainly sent out all the wrong messages.

A whirlwind romance and then marriage to heiress Carla Bruni – one of the richest women in Paris thanks in part to the fortune built by her Italian industrialist father – did not help to improve Mr Sarkozy's image either.

While the French may just about be able to tolerate Mr Sarkozy's high-living, glitzy family and friends, it asks questions about the source of his own money which lies at the centre of the latest allegations against him, and his colleagues.

Mr Sarkozy does not come from a moneyed background. His father, Pál, was a Hungarian immigrant who was penniless when he arrived in Paris after the Second World War. After divorcing from Mr Sarkozy's mother, he left his family with very little money.

As a schoolboy in Paris, the future president said he frequently felt inferior to his wealthier classmates, and later admitted: "What made me who I am now is the sum of all the humiliations suffered during childhood."

But he has since earned a reputation as a "Bling Bling" statesman whose government is known for its links to billionaires and love of the good life.

It recently emerged that Christian Blanc, the minister for Paris, spent 12,000 euros of taxpayers' money on cigars.

Alain Joyandet, the International Development Secretary, meanwhile spent 116,500 euros on a private plane to take him to the Caribbean for a meeting about the Haiti earthquake.

Both resigned. However, questions remain about employment secretary Eric Woerth, who is facing allegations he "assisted" L'Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt in avoiding tax.

Mr Woerth is also said to have helped collect cash payments from Mrs Bettencourt to fund Mr Sarkozy's presidential election campaign.

While Mr Sarkozy recently announced cutbacks on ministers' perks, including official homes and cars, accusations that he personally received envelopes stuffed full of cash himself have plunged him into the deepest scandal of his presidency.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7877612/French-public-anger-grows-at-government-sleaze-allegations.html

In other EU news, was the latest news from Germany a blip or the start of something more? Either way, stock markets ignored it yesterday, but I suspect they will come to regret it ahead.

German Factory Orders Unexpectedly Fell in May

July 7 (Bloomberg) -- German factory orders unexpectedly fell for the first time in five months in May as demand for goods made in Europe’s largest economy waned across the 16- nation euro region.

Orders, adjusted for seasonal swings and inflation, declined 0.5 percent from April, when they rose a revised 3.2 percent, the Economy Ministry in Berlin said today. Economists had forecast a 0.3 percent gain for May, according to the median of 30 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. From a year earlier, orders increased 24.8 percent.

Europe’s sovereign debt crisis has pushed the euro down 17 percent against the dollar since late November, making exports to countries outside the currency bloc more competitive just as the global recovery gathered pace. With governments cutting spending to convince investors that budget deficits are under control, growth in the euro area, Germany’s biggest export market, may slow.

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=axrasGogNr0g

In also ignored US news:

US shopping center vacancy rates rose in 2nd qtr

Wed Jul 7, 2010 12:01am EDT

* U.S. strip mall vacancy hits 10.9 pct

* U.S. mall vacancy reaches 10-year high

* Recovery expected to be weak and prolonged

By Ilaina Jonas

NEW YORK, July 7 (Reuters) - Retailers shuttered more stores in U.S. shopping centers during the second quarter, further delaying a rebound in the struggling retail real estate market, according to research firm Reis Inc.

Shopping centers and strip malls have been pounded harder than other types of real estate, hurt by weak consumer spending, anemic job growth and an oversupply built to serve new housing that never materialized.

"Until we see stabilization and recovery take root in both consumer spending and business spending and employment, we do not foresee a recovery in the retail sector until late 2012 at the earliest," said Victor Calanog, Reis director of research.

For U.S. strip centers, the vacancy rate in the second quarter rose 0.10 percentage point from the first quarter to 10.9 percent, slightly below the 11 percent in 1991 during the prior real estate bust, according to the Reis quarterly report, released on Wednesday.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0610302020100707

We end for the day with two of the best “informed” opinions around. Like the rebounding stock markets, canny Dutchman Willem Buiter, now chief economist dancing for his supper at Citigroup, doesn’t see a double-dip recession ahead.

Below that, “Investment Biker” Jim Rogers holds court with The Telegraph on his investment view from Singapore.

Willem Buiter: double-dip recession won't happen despite worry of 'noisy' market

Willem Buiter, chief economist at Citigroup and a former Bank of England policy-maker, said he does not believe there will be a global double-dip recession.

By Angela Monaghan Published: 9:31PM BST 07 Jul 2010

He said that the process of fiscal tightening planned in many countries was necessary but unlikely to tip economies back into contraction.

In recent weeks mounting fears of a double-dip have driven markets down, despite the fact economists widely believe that it is unlikely.

Mr Buiter said: "I view the markets as noisy children. You have to pay attention to them but you shouldn't take them too seriously. Markets have predicted eight of the last three recessions."

Referring to the UK, he said it would be "unwise" to close the Bank of England's Special Liquidity Scheme without putting something else in its place. The scheme provided the banks with £185bn of emergency funding in total, and comes to an end in 2012. Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England has insisted in the past that the scheme would not be extended.

The Bank's Monetary Policy Committee is expected to leave interest rates on hold at 0.5pc on Thursday, as it weighs the fragility of the recovery against above-target inflation. It is also expected to maintain its quantitative easing target at £200bn of asset purchases.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/7877937/Willem-Buiter-double-dip-recession-wont-happen-despite-worry-of-noisy-market.html

Jim Rogers: 'I don't have investments in the UK'

Legendary investment guru Jim Rogers set up one of the world's first hedge funds with George Soros in 1970.

By Justin Harper Published: 1:47PM BST 06 Jul 2010

After co-founding the famous Quantum Fund he has since amassed millions with his contrarian investment strategies.

The maverick investor started putting money into the Chinese economy long before it became popular with today's fund managers.

----- Do you still hold the view that the UK is finished?

Well, I don't have investments in the UK. I am put off by the gigantic debts built up in the last few years by the previous government. The numbers are truly staggering.

And the UK has had a balance of trade deficit for the last 25 years which has been growing over the years. It used to rely on North Sea oil to bolster its international earnings coupled with the City of London being a financial centre. But as these have declined I don't see anything replacing this revenue stream. I think the balance of trade and debt levels will get worse.

------Are you as downbeat about the rest of the world's economies?

I have not been buying stocks for at least a year and a half. Lying ahead I see more currency turmoil and the world economies' problems have still not been sorted out. I moved to Asia as I see massive opportunities here compared to Europe and the US.

Many Asian economies have been powering ahead while the rest of the world suffered. But Asian economies can't pull the world out of its hardships. Even with China and India booming these can't save the day for the rest of us. As Europe continues to have its problems everybody else is affected.

So do you see the balance of power shifting to Asia?

In the 1920s and 30s there was a shift in economic power from the UK to the US and the same thing is happening now to Asia. Few people realised it at the time and the same is true now. But the continent has some of the largest creditors in the world – Korea, China, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore etc all have surpluses while other major economies are massively in debt.

------But you've been buying the euro recently?

When no one wants something that should be a signal to buy it. Everyone has been selling the euro so I bought some, if only for the rally.

This doesn't mean that I think European governments have got their act together. Far from it. But the euro could go up from a rebound rally so that's why I'm interested.

But generally I think paper money is flawed. Nearly every currency in the world is flawed, the euro just happens to be less flawed than others.

I've also been buying the Danish Kroner and the Swedish Kronor but I'm not buying any more now.

So if you're not investing in equities where else are you putting your money?

There are lots of alternatives. I own gold and it is reaching an all-time high but that doesn't mean I'm about to sell it. While now might not be the best time to buy gold there are other precious metals that are well off their all-time highs.

Foe example silver is about 60pc off its all-time high so could be a buying opportunity. Anything that is so far off its all-time high gets me interested. Platinum and palladium are also nowhere near their historic highs.

-----And what lies in store for your homeland?

The US has similar problems to the UK with massive debt levels. In fact it is the biggest debtor the world has ever seen. So I have no investments there either.

But what really worries me is that some states, counties and cities have been or are on the verge of going bankrupt. California is much larger than Greece and we've seen the fallout from the Greek debt crisis.

A lot of promises have been made in these cities and states from both the public and private sector and these have been papered over. Greece has been going on about its debt for a decade and people weren't paying attention. The same is happening across the US. The Fed has already bailed out the banks and I wonder how its finances will cope once more bankrupt states and cities approach it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/7874935/Jim-Rogers-I-dont-have-investments-in-the-UK.html

At the Comex silver depositories Wednesday, final figures were: Registered 52.54 Moz, Eligible 61.36 Moz, Total 113.90 Moz.

+++++

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

No crooks today, just a British senior civil servant exonerating the British dodgy climate science scientists, at the probity challenged Climatic Research Unit of the iffy University of East Anglia. Phew, for a while there we thought it was going to be a whitewash and cover up! So that’s alright then, makes one proud to see British fair play in action.

While giving evidence at the trial of Stephen Ward, charged with living off the immoral earnings of Keeler and Rice-Davies, the latter made a famous riposte. When the prosecuting counsel pointed out that Lord Astor denied an affair or having even met her, she replied, "Well, he would, wouldn't he?"

'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty over data

'Rigour and honesty' of scientists not in doubt but Sir Muir Russell says UEA's Climatic Research Unit was not sufficiently open

David Adam, environment correspondent Wednesday 7 July 2010 13.02 BST

The climate scientists at the centre of a media storm were today cleared of accusations that they fudged their results and silenced critics to bolster the case for man-made global warming.

Sir Muir Russell, the senior civil servant who led a six-month inquiry into the affair, said the "rigour and honesty" of the scientists at the world-leading Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) are not in doubt. They did not subvert the peer review process to censor criticism as alleged, the panel found, while key data needed to reproduce their findings was freely available to any "competent" researcher.

The panel did criticise the scientists for not being open enough about their work, and said they were "unhelpful and defensive" when responding to legitimate requests made under freedom of information (FOI) laws.

The row was sparked when 13 years of emails from CRU scientists were hacked and released online last year. Climate change sceptics claimed they showed scientists manipulating and suppressing data to back up a theory of man-made climate change. Critics also alleged that the scientists abused their positions to cover up flaws and distort the peer review process that determines which studies are published in journals, and so enter the scientific record. Some alleged that the emails cast doubt on the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Announcing the findings, Russell said: "Ultimately this has to be about what they did, not what they said."

He added: "The honesty and rigour of CRU as scientists are not in doubt ... We have not found any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments."

The review is the third and final inquiry into the email affair, dubbed "climategate", and effectively clears Professor Phil Jones, head of the CRU, and his colleagues of the most serious charges. Questions remain over the way in which they responded to requests for information from people outside the conventional scientific arena, some of whom were long-standing critics of Jones.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/07/climategate-review-clears-scientists-dishonesty

“The appellant made the general answer that this was a free country and a man can do what he likes if he does nobody any harm.... It cannot be too clearly understood that this is not a free country, and it will be an evil day for the legal profession when it is. Citizens of London must realize there is almost nothing they are allowed to do… and least of all may they do unusual actions "for fun". People must not do things for fun. There is no reference to fun in any Act of Parliament. It is not for me to say what offence the appellant has committed, but I am satisfied that he has committed some offence, for which he has been most properly punished."

Lord Light, the Lord Chief Justice. "Is It a Free Country?" A.P. Herbert.

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished June:

DJIA: +269 Down. NASDAQ: +460 Down. SP500: +290 Down.

The bull market (or bear market rally) that commenced on Nasdaq on 30/4/09 at 1717 has ended. (30/5/09 SP 500 at 919, 30/5/09 DJIA 8500.) While the indicators can flip flop at market turns, this action is rare on the slow monthly indicators. Given the weakening BDI, and the ECRI leading indicators signaling recession ahead, it is probably safer to assume that the great stock market bounce has ended and that we are entering a new bear market, or alternately, resuming the old one after a bear market rally.

Help the LIR fight Banksterism, the EU, and for sound money.

If you can, help the LIR stay around and make a difference. Please make a donation at the PayPal link on the website or better still become a sponsor for what looks like an exciting 2010. Capitalism not banksterism. Many thanks to all who have helped.

+++++

Sunspots – A 22 year colder world? (From 2004?)

Spotless Days July 07
Current Stretch:0 days

2010 total: 35 days (19%)
2009 total: 260 days (71%)
Since 2004: 803 days
Typical Solar Min: 485 days

http://www.spaceweather.com/

The long minimum seems to have ended, or has it? Despite the record and near record heat waves sweeping the northern hemisphere, I’m beginning to think our new Dalton Minimum of arriving global cooling, might turn out in fact to be a much longer more severe Maunder Minimum. More in the next few days on the Sunspot page on the website.

Monday, 19 April 2010

Sached! Government Sached!

Baltic Dry Index. 3009 +08

LIR Gold Target by 2019: $3,000.

“Prime Minister Gordon Brown called yesterday for the Financial Services Authority to start an inquiry, saying he was “shocked” at the “moral bankruptcy” indicated in the suit. Germany’s financial regulator, Bafin, asked the SEC for details on the suit, a spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkel said.”

We open with the continuing havoc to international air travel in Europe, where the economic consequences are now starting to build. Below, the Journal covers the story, with the airlines now starting to take the line that the complete shutdown is a gross over reaction. Who knows? But will the public, by now conditioned to expect jet planes engines to cease working and planes to fall out of the sky the moment they hit volcano dust, really pay to fly in new a form of Russian roulette? I have my doubts that many families will take a chance just to help airlines lose less money. “Fly us, if it’s the last thing you do,” doesn’t sound very persuasive to me. The first time a plane really does fall out of the sky, all hell will break loose even if the pilots manage to get it back on the ground without loss of life. I’m not too sure either that insurance coverage will be viable for planes operating against the recommendation not to fly. I suspect that it would invalidate both the airlines insurance coverage itself, and all of the separate passenger insurance policies. Give an insurance company wiggle room, and they’ll wiggle right out of having to pay anything. My guess is that a government or EU bailout will soon be on the table.

APRIL 18, 2010
Extended Disruptions Will Hurt EU Recovery
Airlines Lobby Governments to Lift Flying Bans as Some Take Experimental Flights to Test Effects of Volcanic Ash on Jets

The extended closure of European airspace because of a cloud of volcanic ash threatens to snuff out the region's feeble economic recovery and has prompted airlines to take unusual measures in an effort to regain some control of the situation.

As aviation authorities prolonged the ban on flights into Monday, bringing the number of canceled flights to more than 63,000, hard-hit European airlines conducted test flights over the weekend to assess the safety of operating through ash and dust spewing out of an Icelandic volcano since Thursday. Many aviation officials say that authorities have overreacted by closing vast swathes of airspace without detailed analysis of atmospheric conditions and the dangers posed.

"It is completely safe to operate flights during hours of daylight," said Peter Hartman, chief executive of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown interrupted his campaigning for the U.K. national election to call an emergency cabinet meeting to figure out what to do about the thousands of Britons stranded outside the country, potentially by routing them through Spain or using the Royal Navy.

Late Sunday, aviation and meteorological authorities held out a slight hope that more flights could operate Monday as winds appeared to shift slightly, carrying the cloud away from eastern Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic, a spokeswoman for the European Union's transport commissioner said.

Meanwhile, airlines improvised solutions to move passengers where they could. The Air France unit of Air France-KLM SA said it would operate nine long-haul flights Monday to airports in southern France that reopened. Continental Airlines Inc., one of the largest trans-Atlantic operators, said it was changing its schedule to put more flights into the few open airports in Southern Europe. Delta Air Lines Inc. said it planned extra flights with larger aircraft when skies reopened. And Indian carrier Jet Airways, which flies to North America using a hub at Brussels Airport, started using Athens Airport to refuel planes.

Economists said that if the closure ends in coming days, its financial impact will remain limited to industries such as aviation, tourism and manufacturers that rely on just-in-time delivery by air. If the flight ban drags on, however, the pain will be far deeper, analysts predicted.

"Europe is the biggest exporter in the world and the second biggest importer. It is China's biggest customer," said Eric Chaney, chief economist at AXA Group. "Trade has been the biggest component in the global recovery and [an extended grounding] will have a significant impact on global trade and on the recovery that's still fragile."

Trade groups representing European airports and airlines on Sunday called for an "immediate reassessment of flight restrictions" in a joint statement, saying nearly seven million people had been affected.

"The eruption of the Icelandic volcano is not an unprecedented event, and the procedures applied in other parts of the world for volcanic eruptions do not appear to require the kind of restrictions that are presently being imposed in Europe," said the statement from the Association of European Airlines and Airports Council International Europe.

Aviation authorities and safety experts have said they are following United Nations guidelines and experience from past incidents.

-----Axel Raab, spokesman for the German national air-safety agency, DFS, said Europe lacked balloons able to measure the density or concentration of the ash in the air and equipment to do so wasn't in place because it had never been needed. Weather stations were being upgraded and a plane was being fitted with equipment to measure how much ash is really in the air, he said.
The growing airline push-back came as the ash cloud threatened to cause broad economic impact just as Europe and the world were pulling out of recession. In a forecast released Friday that doesn't account for the grounding, the accountancy firm Ernst & Young predicted a "feeble" recovery for the 16 nations of the euro zone, with growth of just 1% this year after a negative 4% in 2009.

Damage is spreading beyond air-travel and tourism to businesses that rely on air cargo—including overnight shipments and freight that moves more slowly in the bellies of passenger jets. For anyone trying to ship to or from Europe, the closure has a "tremendous impact because nothing is moving, whether it's a legal document, or seafood, or fresh flowers, or heavy freight," said Norman Black, spokesman for shipping giant United Parcel Service Inc.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703594404575192160633439360.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hps_LEFTTopStories

Up next, “the name’s Fab, Fabrice P. Tourre.” Below the NY Times astutely notices that the wretched man named at the centre of the SEC’s civil fraud suit leveled Friday against God’s workers toiling away for billion dollar bonuses at Goldman Sachs, is drumroll, French! Worse he’s described as “an effusive young Frenchman” who “masterminded” the mortgage deals that were deliberately designed to fail. Luckily “The Fab,” yes according to the WSJ he really did sign off on his emails that way, is now safely parked away in London which no one can reach thanks to a wayward volcano in Iceland. A third strike against him surely after strike one being a mastermind star at Government Sachs, with strike two being a “cheese eating surrender monkey,” from France!! But the NY Times thinks that more were involved in ambushing the duped Goldman client list of the formerly fabulously rich and sometimes famous. I suspect that this story is going to grow, and grow, and grow. Knives are being sharpened in Europe to claw back billions from the alleged American fraudsters. Is Goldie the American UBS? Stay long gold and silver, two decades of financial crime is about to come crashing down.

"I want us to do even more to encourage the risk takers"

Gordon Brown. 2004
.

Top Goldman Leaders Said to Have Overseen Mortgage Unit
By LOUISE STORY Published: April 18, 2010

-----Among those who saw disaster looming were an effusive young Frenchman, Fabrice P. Tourre, and his quiet colleague, Jonathan M. Egol, the mastermind behind a series of mortgage deals known as the Abacus investments.

Their elite mortgage unit is now at the center of allegations that Goldman and Mr. Tourre, 31, defrauded investors with one of those complex deals.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil fraud suit on Friday that essentially says that Goldman built the financial equivalent of a time bomb and then sold it to unwitting investors. Mr. Egol, 40, was not named in the S.E.C.’s suit.

Goldman has vowed to fight the S.E.C. But the allegations have left many on Wall Street wondering how far the investigation might spread inside Goldman and perhaps beyond.
Pressure on Goldman mounted on Sunday as two members of Congress and Gordon Brown, Britain’s prime minister, called for investigations into the bank’s role in the mortgage market. Germany also said it was considering legal action against the bank.

Mr. Tourre was the only person named in the S.E.C. suit. But according to interviews with eight former Goldman employees, senior bank executives played a pivotal role in overseeing the mortgage unit just as the housing market began to go south. These people spoke on the condition that they not be named so as not to jeopardize business relationships or to anger executives at Goldman, viewed as the most powerful bank on Wall Street.

According to these people, executives up to and including Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chairman and chief executive, took an active role in overseeing the mortgage unit as the tremors in the housing market began to reverberate through the nation’s economy. It was Goldman’s top leadership, these people say, that finally ended the dispute on the mortgage desk by siding with those who, like Mr. Tourre and Mr. Egol, believed home prices would decline.

Lucas van Praag, a Goldman spokesman, said that senior executives were not involved in approving the Abacus deals. He said that the executives had sought to balance Goldman’s positive bets on the mortgage market, rather than take an overall negative view.

Mr. Tourre, who now works for Goldman in London, declined to comment, as did Mr. Egol, Mr. van Praag said.

-----By early 2007, Goldman’s mortgage unit had become a hive of intense activity. By then, the business had captured the attention of senior management. In addition to Mr. Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn, Goldman’s president, and David A. Viniar, the chief financial officer, visited the mortgage unit frequently, often for hours at a time.

Such high-level involvement was unusual elsewhere on Wall Street, where many executives spent little time learning the workings of their mortgage businesses or how those businesses might endanger their companies.

The decision to get rid of positive bets on mortgages turned out to be prescient. Unlike most other Wall Street banks, Goldman profited from its mortgage business as the housing bubble was inflating and then again when the bubble burst.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/19goldman.html?hp

APRIL 19, 2010
SEC Probes Other Soured Deals
The Securities and Exchange Commission, after having hit Goldman Sachs Group Inc. with a civil fraud charge, is investigating whether other mortgage deals arranged by some of Wall Street's biggest firms may have crossed the line into misleading investors.

The SEC's case against Goldman Friday has exposed an open secret on Wall Street: As the housing market began to wobble a few years back, some big financial firms designed products aimed at allowing key clients, such as hedge funds, to bet on a sharp housing downturn.

Among the firms that created mortgage deals that soon went sour were Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG and Merrill Lynch & Co., now owned by Bank of America Corp. It isn't known what deals the SEC is investigating.

Further cases could hinge on whether the SEC sees what it considers misrepresentation, and not just questions such as whether a deal favored one client over another. A critical part of the SEC's case against Goldman is that the firm allegedly misled investors by not notifying them of the role of hedge-fund investor John Paulson—who was dubious of the housing boom—in selecting what went into the mortgage deal Goldman sold. Goldman said it fully disclosed the investments and didn't need to reveal the Paulson connection.

The deals generated about $1 billion in total fees for the firms, traders say. Investors that bought them often lost heavily. Now private lawsuits, along with the SEC's case against Goldman, are shedding light on how some of these mortgage deals were put together.

Soured mortgage investments helped trigger the near-collapse of American International Group Inc., which had insured at least $1 billion of bond deals issued by Wall Street firms in 2005 that reflected hedge funds' input, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal and people familiar with the matter. Taxpayers had to foot the bill for AIG's rescue.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704508904575192294041013802.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hps_LEFTTopWhatNews

Looters in Loafers
By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: April 18, 2010
Last October, I saw a cartoon by Mike Peters in which a teacher asks a student to create a sentence that uses the verb “sacks,” as in looting and pillaging. The student replies, “Goldman Sachs.”

Sure enough, last week the Securities and Exchange Commission accused the Gucci-loafer guys at Goldman of engaging in what amounts to white-collar looting.

I’m using the term looting in the sense defined by the economists George Akerlof and Paul Romer in a 1993 paper titled “Looting: The Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit.” That paper, written in the aftermath of the savings-and-loan crisis of the Reagan years, argued that many of the losses in that crisis were the result of deliberate fraud.

-----We’ve known for some time that Goldman Sachs and other firms marketed mortgage-backed securities even as they sought to make profits by betting that such securities would plunge in value. This practice, however, while arguably reprehensible, wasn’t illegal. But now the S.E.C. is charging that Goldman created and marketed securities that were deliberately designed to fail, so that an important client could make money off that failure. That’s what I would call looting.

And Goldman isn’t the only financial firm accused of doing this. According to the Pulitzer-winning investigative journalism Web site ProPublica, several banks helped market designed-to-fail investments on behalf of the hedge fund Magnetar, which was betting on that failure.
So what role did fraud play in the financial crisis? Neither predatory lending nor the selling of mortgages on false pretenses caused the crisis. But they surely made it worse, both by helping to inflate the housing bubble and by creating a pool of assets guaranteed to turn into toxic waste once the bubble burst.

As for the alleged creation of investments designed to fail, these may have magnified losses at the banks that were on the losing side of these deals, deepening the banking crisis that turned the burst housing bubble into an economy-wide catastrophe.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/opinion/19krugman.html?hp


Goldman May Face U.K., German Inquiries After Suit
By Michael Patterson and Tony Czuczka

April 19 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. faces a regulatory probe in Britain and scrutiny from the German government after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the firm for fraud tied to collateralized debt obligations.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown called yesterday for the Financial Services Authority to start an inquiry, saying he was “shocked” at the “moral bankruptcy” indicated in the suit. Germany’s financial regulator, Bafin, asked the SEC for details on the suit, a spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkel said.

Politicians that were forced to bail out their banks during the financial crisis are turning on Goldman, which critics say helped caused the turmoil and profited from it. The European Union is also probing Goldman’s role in arranging swaps for Greece that may have masked the country’s budget deficit.

“We will see politicians throughout the world piling on Goldman Sachs,” said Scott Moeller, a former investment banker now teaching at Cass Business School in London. “Now they have vulnerability. Everyone and anyone, especially politicians, are going to be trying to make hay with this one.”

----- “It looks as if people were misled about what happened,” Brown, who faces a national election on May 6, said on the BBC’s Andrew Marr program yesterday. “The banks are still an issue. They are a risk to the economy.’

Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc paid $841 million to Goldman Sachs to unwind its position in Abacus, which it inherited when it bought parts of ABN Amro in 2007, according to the SEC. The Edinburgh-based lender is now controlled by the British government after receiving a 45.5 billion-pound ($70 billion) taxpayer rescue, the world’s biggest banking bailout.

The SEC said Goldman Sachs misled investor IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG about Paulson’s role in the trade. Dusseldorf- based IKB lost about $150 million in the Abacus CDO, most of which went to Paulson, which reaped a $1 billion profit in total from betting against the vehicle, according to the SEC.

Legal Steps

IKB became Germany’s first casualty of the U.S. subprime- mortgage crisis in 2007 after its investments in asset-backed securities soured. KfW, Germany’s state-owned development bank, pumped almost 10 billion euros ($13.5 billion) into IKB in 2008 to shore up the country’s banking system.

The German government “will ask the SEC for information,” said Ulrich Wilhelm, a spokesman for Merkel. “Then we will look at the records and consider possible legal steps.”

Goldman Sachs said in a statement it had provided “extensive disclosure” to IKB about the risk of the underlying mortgage securities. Paulson, which hasn’t been charged with any wrongdoing, said in a statement that it didn’t “sponsor or initiate” Goldman’s Abacus program. The fund said that while it did purchase credit protection from Goldman on some Abacus securities, it wasn’t involved in the marketing.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNSmRVxms8jg&pos=2

"God, no, we don't club baby seals. We club babies."

Goldmanite, quoted in The Times of London. November 8 2009.

At the Comex silver depositories Friday, final figures were: Registered 48.85 Moz, Eligible 66.75 Moz, Total 115.60 Moz.



+++++

Crooks & Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

Today, more on the British whitewash of the climategate scandal.

“Time will bring to light whatever is hidden; it will cover up and conceal what is now shining in splendor.”

Horace.


Climategate: a scandal that won’t go away
From Macbeth to Watergate, it’s not the act that leads to nemesis, but the attempts to 'trammel up the consequence’ , writes Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker Published: 7:22PM BST 17 Apr 2010

-----Confronted with all those scandals surrounding the “Climategate” emails and the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the political and academic establishments have responded with a series of inquiries and statements designed to show that the methods used to construct the official scientific case are wholly sound. But as was illustrated last week by two very different reports, these efforts to hold the line are themselves so demonstrably flawed that they are in danger of backfiring, leaving the science more questionable than ever.

The first report centred directly on the IPCC itself. When several of the more alarmist claims in its most recent 2007 report were revealed to be wrong and without any scientific foundation, the official response, not least from the IPCC’s chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, was to claim that everything in its report was “peer-reviewed”, having been confirmed by independent experts.
But a new study put this claim to the test. A team of 40 researchers from 12 countries, led by a Canadian analyst Donna Laframboise, checked out every one of the 18,531 scientific sources cited in the mammoth 2007 report. Astonishingly, they found that nearly a third of them – 5,587 – were not peer-reviewed at all, but came from newspaper articles, student theses, even propaganda leaflets and press releases put out by green activists and lobby groups.

In its own way even more damaging, however, was the report from a team led by Lord Oxburgh on the scientific integrity of the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU). Two sets of evidence have been used more than anything else to drive the worldwide scare over global warming. One is a series of graphs showing how temperatures have suddenly shot up in recent decades to levels historically unprecedented. The other is the official record of global surface temperatures. For both of these, the CRU and the key group of top British and American scientists involved in those Climategate emails have been crucially responsible.

Lord Oxburgh himself is linked to various commercial interests which make money from climate change, from wind farms to carbon trading. None of the panel he worked with on his report were climate “sceptics”; and one, Dr Kerry Emanuel, is an outspoken advocate of man-made global warming. Even so, it was surprising to see just how superficial their inquiry turned out to be, based on two brief visits to the CRU and on reading 11 scientific papers produced by the research unit in the past 24 years, chosen in consultation with the Royal Society (which is itself fanatical in promotion of warming orthodoxy).

The crown jewels of the IPCC’s case that the world faces catastrophic warming have been all those graphs based on tree rings which purport to show that temperatures have lately been soaring to levels never known before in history – thus eradicating all the evidence that the world was hotter than today during the Medieval Warm Period, long before any rise in CO2 levels. Best known of these graphs, of course, was Michael Mann’s “hockey stick”, comprehensively discredited by the expert Canadian statistician Stephen McIntyre and Professor Ross McKitrick. But the IPCC was able to defend its case with the aid of another set of “hockey sticks”, based on different tree rings, produced by Mann’s close allies at the CRU.

The most widely quoted of the Climategate emails was that from the CRU’s director, Philip Jones, saying that he had used “Mike’s Nature trick” to “hide the decline”. If there was anything in the CRU’s record which a proper inquiry should have addressed it was the story behind this email, because what it highlighted was the device used by the CRU to get round the fact that its tree-ring data hopelessly failed to show the result the warmist establishment wanted. When their Siberian tree rings showed temperatures in the late 20th century sharply dropping rather than rising, the “trick” used by Prof Jones and his colleague Dr Keith Briffa, copied from Mike Mann’s own “hockey stick”, was simply to delete the downward curve shown by the tree rings, replacing them with late 20th-century temperature data to show the dramatic warming
they wanted.

The significance of this sleight of hand can scarcely be exaggerated. Why, in using this misleading graph, did the IPCC not explain the trick that had been played by its leading scientists? If tree rings were so inadequate in reflecting 20th-century temperatures, why should they be relied on to reflect temperatures in earlier centuries? Why, when fresh Siberian tree ring data came to light, making a nonsense of the CRU’s earlier temperature reconstructions, did the CRU simply ignore the new data?

Anyone who has followed the meticulous analysis of this curious story by Steve McIntyre on his Climate Audit website might well conclude that we are looking here at a complete travesty of proper scientific procedure, matched only by the bizarre methods used by Mann himself to construct his original hockey stick. Yet these are the men, Mann, Jones and Briffa, who acted as the “lead authors” of the key chapters of the IPCC’s 2001 and 2007 reports.
They quite shamelessly promoted the rewriting of history produced by themselves and a small group of colleagues – the so-called Hockey Team – which the IPCC in turn used as its main evidence to convince the politicians that the world faces unprecedented warming.

Yet scarcely a hint of this hugely important story is contained in the Oxburgh report, which simply glosses it over, hoping to appease critics by throwing in a few vaguely critical comments about how Jones and his team were a trifle “disorganised” in archiving their data. It ignores the utterly damning critiques of the CRU’s methodology produced by McIntyre and McKitrick. It does not even begin to question the way the CRU has compiled its global temperature record, relied on by the IPCC as the most authoritative of all the official data sources for surface temperatures.

Yet this in turn has given rise to all sorts of controversies, not least when Prof Jones last year admitted that much of his data had been “lost” (following his repeated refusals of applications to see it by McIntyre and others). More damaging still was the charge by senior Russian scientists that, in compiling its global record, CRU had cherry-picked the data supplied from Russia, suppressing that from most of the country while retaining the data from the vicinity of cities which, thanks to the “urban heat island” effect, showed a warming trend. So even the accuracy of CRU’s temperature record has been called seriously in doubt, although one would never have guessed it from Oxburgh.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7601929/Climategate-a-scandal-that-wont-go-away.html

“The least productive people are usually the ones who are most in favor of holding meetings”

Thomas Sowell. American Economist.

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished March:

DJIA: +168 UP. NASDAQ: +370 UP. SP500: +196 UP. The great Bull market goes on with the all three continuing higher in positive numbers.

+++++

Help the LIR fight Banksterism, the EU, and for sound money.
If you can, help the LIR stay around and make a difference. Please make a donation at the PayPal link on the website or better still become a sponsor for what looks like an exciting 2010. Capitalism not banksterism. Many thanks to all who have helped.

+++++

Below, Mr "straight kind of guy" bets on the UK election.