Wednesday, 11 December 2019

Fed Day. USMCA. A Stormy Election.


Baltic Dry Index. 1528 -23 Brent Crude 63.98 Spot Gold 1464

Never ending Brexit now January 31, or maybe sooner.
Trump’s Nuclear China Tariffs Now in effect.
The USA v EU trade war started October 18. Now in effect.

“To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day.”

Sir Winston Churchill.

Another day, more waiting.  In trade war news, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, says a deal is close but it’s all down to Trump’s decision. Who knew?

It’s all down to the Fed’s decision, or non-decision later today, and how they spin their latest continuing monetization. Just don’t call it a monetization. That brings comparisons to Venezuela and Zimbabwe, among other success stories.

Elsewhere in global trade news, it was a WTO loss v an USMCA “win.” To most outside observers, the “win” looks more like a weak revision of NAFTA at best, a loss if it turns out to be meaningless.

The WTO loss could be immense, depending on what everyone now does next. With no appeals process left in place, will countries just ignore WTO rulings? Accept them without appeal? Try to arbitrate them? All three?

In the UK, an election tired voting population “prepares,” for a stormy general election tomorrow. With roughly only 8 hours of daylight at this time of year, and bracing for gales, storm force winds, rain, hail, and snow in some parts of wintry GB, it will be interesting to see voter turnout, and where. With reportedly some 3 million newly registered voters intending to vote, according to some of the media, the polls are likely to be highly unreliable, if many if not most of the three million turn out to vote.

Below, another day of waiting and watching.

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.”

Sir Winston Churchill.

Asian shares drift as tariff deadline looms, pound eases on YouGov poll

December 11, 2019 / 12:54 AM
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Asian stocks drifted on Wednesday as Sino-U.S. trade talks showed little progress ahead of a weekend deadline for the imposition of additional U.S. tariffs, and the pound wobbled as opinion polls pointed to a tight British election on Thursday.

MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan drifted 0.1% higher, as markets in the region wavered either side of flat. Japan's Nikkei .N225 traded 0.2% lower, Australia's S&P/ASX 200 rose by the same margin. 

Shanghai blue chips .CSI300 added 0.1%. U.S. stock futures ESc1 were 0.1% lower.

Faced with often conflicting reports, investors have begun to suspect that even if U.S. tariffs due to take effect on Sunday are delayed, it could take until 2020 before Washington and Beijing can agree a preliminary deal to wind back their trade war.

“Every day we get a little bit of a nudge one way or the other,” said Rob Carnell, Asia-Pacific chief economist at ING in Singapore. “You just don’t know who to believe, whether these comments have any basis in reality or whether they’re a negotiating tactic.”

In the absence of harder news on the trade front, investors’ focus was locked on the U.S. Federal Reserve’s policy meeting and its outlook for the economy due at 2000 GMT, as well as Britain’s election.

The Fed is widely expected to hold rates steady, with investors interested in whether the central bank changes its view of the economy and its 2% growth forecast for next year.
More

Trump will have final say on U.S.-China trade deal - White House trade adviser

December 11, 2019 / 1:10 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump will be the one to make the final decision on tariffs and the U.S.-China trade deal, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Tuesday.

“Either way we’re going to be in a great place ... The president loves them (the tariffs),” Navarro said in an interview with Fox Business Network.

“If we get a great deal, we’ll be in a good place as well. But it will be the president’s decision. It will come soon,” Navarro added.

U.S. trade offensive takes out WTO as global arbiter

December 10, 2019 / 9:26 AM
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - U.S. disruption of the global economic order reaches a major milestone on Tuesday as the World Trade Organization (WTO) loses its ability to intervene in trade wars, threatening the future of the Geneva-based body.

Two years after starting to block appointments, the United States will finally paralyse the WTO’s Appellate Body, which acts as the supreme court for international trade, as two of three members exit and leave it unable to issue rulings. 

Major trade disputes, including the U.S. conflict with China and metal tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, will not be resolved by the global trade arbiter.

Stephen Vaughn, who served as general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative during Trump’s first two years, said many disputes would be settled in future by negotiations.

Critics say this means a return to a post-war period of inconsistent settlements, problems the WTO’s creation in 1995 was designed to fix.

The EU ambassador to the WTO told counterparts in Geneva on Monday the Appellate Body’s paralysis risked creating a system of economic relations based on power rather than rules.

The crippling of dispute settlement comes as the WTO also struggles in its other major role of opening markets.

---- Two years after starting to block appointments, the United States will finally paralyse the WTO’s Appellate Body, which acts as the supreme court for international trade, as two of three members exit and leave it unable to issue rulings.

Major trade disputes, including the U.S. conflict with China and metal tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, will not be resolved by the global trade arbiter.

Stephen Vaughn, who served as general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative during Trump’s first two years, said many disputes would be settled in future by negotiations.

Critics say this means a return to a post-war period of inconsistent settlements, problems the WTO’s creation in 1995 was designed to fix.

The EU ambassador to the WTO told counterparts in Geneva on Monday the Appellate Body’s paralysis risked creating a system of economic relations based on power rather than rules.

The crippling of dispute settlement comes as the WTO also struggles in its other major role of opening markets.
More

 In Apparent Victory for Trump, Pelosi Approves USMCA: Look Closer

Democrats agree to pass USMCA, Trump's NAFTA replacement.

Goodbye NAFTA, Hello USMCA

In what "seemingly" constitutes a major victory for Trump, Democratic Lawmakers Agree to Support North America Trade Pact.

House Democrats agreed to support the new U.S. trade deal with Mexico and Canada, marking a victory for President Trump who ran for office in 2016 on a pledge to remake or blow up the North American Free Trade Agreement.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the new version of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement a “victory for American workers” at a Tuesday morning news conference. The pact will replace Nafta when ratified and contains provisions aimed at creating more manufacturing jobs, for example, by increasing the proportion of vehicles that must originate in North America for the cars and trucks to receive duty-free treatment.

It also includes updated labor rules and beefed-up enforcement provisions to hold firms in Mexico to account on labor, according to people familiar with the emerging deal.

USMCA had long been supported by Republicans and leading business trade groups but opposed by Democrats over concerns such as the legal language enforcing new labor rules. The Democratic approval Monday comes as a rare bipartisan moment of cooperation on economic policy at a time when Capitol Hill is divided over the impeachment inquiry.

---- Point by Point Comments

1: Pelosi wanted more, and settled for less. Five days ago, the Wall Street Journal reported Democrats Want to Invade Mexico. Essentially, the unions demanded that the US be allowed to enforce labor laws in Mexico. However, Mexico would not agree. Canada would not have gone alone either.

2: The devil is in the details. I suspect Mexico will be able to circumvent these rules, if it wants.

3: Digital rules accomplish nothing.

4: Agriculture essentially remains the status quo. Wisconsin dairy farmers do get a minor victory.

5: This is a potential victory for US consumers, but one that Trump did not appear to want. In practice, however, I wonder if it does much.
More

“Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.”

Sir Winston Churchill.
 

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

Today, finally some BBC sanity. Time to defund the extreme left wing, anti-British BBC.

UK says could decriminalise non-payment of BBC licence fee

December 10, 2019 / 7:32 AM
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain is looking at whether or not to decriminalise the penalty for non-payment of the 154.50-pound annual BBC “licence fee” tax on all television-watching households, Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said on Tuesday.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday questioned why the BBC should continue to be supported by the annual fee, one of the biggest hints to date that the funding of Britain’s main news provider could be upended.

“What we are talking about as a first step is the decriminalisation of failing to pay the TV licence,” Buckland told BBC radio.

He said people during election campaigning had said they worried about the cost of the licence fee.

“Is it right to criminalise and target a vulnerable section of society for what really is an issue of civil liability? We would consult on that to work out whether criminalisation is the right way to approach this issue,” he said.

It is a criminal offence to watch TV or use BBC iplayer in the United Kingdom without a valid TV licence.

Time to dispose of the extreme left wing, anti-America, anti-British, anti-Christian, anti-Israel, anti-Trump, pro-moslem, pro-lgbt, pro-Comrade Corbyn, pro-Clinton, degenerate, trougher’s paradise of the BBC  & World Service.  End the troughers tax. Make the troughers work for their living. End the parasitic, Labour promoting BBC.

Technology Update.
With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported. Is converting sunlight to usable cheap AC or DC energy mankind’s future from the 21st century onwards?

A tech jewel: Converting graphene into diamond film

Synthesis of the thinnest possible diamond-like material starting from bilayer graphene and without high pressure

Date: December 9, 2019

Source: Institute for Basic Science

Summary: Can two layers of the ''king of the wonder materials,'' i.e. graphene, be linked and converted to the thinnest diamond-like material, the ''king of the crystals''? Scientists have reported the first experimental observation of such conversion.

Can two layers of the "king of the wonder materials," i.e. graphene, be linked and converted to the thinnest diamond-like material, the "king of the crystals"? Researchers of the Center for Multidimensional Carbon Materials (CMCM) within the Institute for Basic Science (IBS, South Korea) have reported in Nature Nanotechnology the first experimental observation of a chemically induced conversion of large-area bilayer graphene to the thinnest possible diamond-like material, under moderate pressure and temperature conditions. This flexible, strong material is a wide-band gap semiconductor, and thus has potential for industrial applications in nano-optics, nanoelectronics, and can serve as a promising platform for micro- and nano-electromechanical systems.

Diamond, pencil lead, and graphene are made by the same building blocks: carbon atoms (C). Yet, it is the bonds' configuration between these atoms that makes all the difference. In a diamond, the carbon atoms are strongly bonded in all directions and create an extremely hard material with extraordinary electrical, thermal, optical and chemical properties. In pencil lead, carbon atoms are arranged as a pile of sheets and each sheet is graphene. Strong carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds make up graphene, but weak bonds between the sheets are easily broken and in part explain why the pencil lead is soft. Creating interlayer bonding between graphene layers forms a 2D material, similar to thin diamond films, known as diamane, with many superior characteristics.

Previous attempts to transform bilayer or multilayer graphene into diamane relied on the addition of hydrogen atoms, or high pressure. In the former, the chemical structure and bonds' configuration are difficult to control and characterize. In the latter, the release of the pressure makes the sample revert back to graphene. Natural diamonds are also forged at high temperature and pressure, deep inside the Earth. However, IBS-CMCM scientists tried a different winning approach.

The team devised a new strategy to promote the formation of diamane, by exposing bilayer graphene to fluorine (F), instead of hydrogen. They used vapors of xenon difluoride (XeF2) as the source of F, and no high pressure was needed. The result is an ultra-thin diamond-like material, namely fluorinated diamond monolayer: F-diamane, with interlayer bonds and F outside.

---- "This simple fluorination method works at near-room temperature and under low pressure without the use of plasma or any gas activation mechanisms, hence reduces the possibility of creating defects," points out Pavel V. Bakharev, the first author and co-corresponding author.

Moreover, the F-diamane film could be freely suspended. "We found that we could obtain a free-standing monolayer diamond by transferring F-diamane from the CuNi(111) substrate to a transmission electron microscope grid, followed by another round of mild fluorination," says Ming Huang, one of the first authors.
More

 

“If you have an important point to make, don’t try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time-a tremendous whack.”
Sir Winston Churchill.

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished November


DJIA: 28,051 +76 Up. NASDAQ: 8,665 +94 Up. SP500: 3,141 +90 Up. All higher again, but it’s not a buy signal I would follow. I would wait for the next sell signal.

No comments:

Post a Comment