Saturday 30 March 2019

Weekend Update 30/03/2019 A Realistic Energy Review. A Message For Don.


Baltic Dry Index. 689 -01    Brent Crude 68.39

Brexit 13 days away (maybe.) Never-ending China trade war talks, day 130.

“Dreams do come true, if only we wish hard enough. You can have anything in life if you will sacrifice everything else for it.”

J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan

This weekend something a little different. Two long, but must read, master class articles, for our future next decade.

But first this. Who knew trade wars were so easy for outsiders to win?

U.S. and China Got Into a Trade War and Mexico Won

America’s imports from Mexico surge the most in seven years as Trump’s policies shift supply chains
By Matthew Townsend and Eric Martin
27 March 2019, 10:00 GMT
The Trump Administration’s trade war with China has turned out to be a windfall for another country the president frequently berates: Mexico.

Consider Fuling Global Inc., a Chinese maker of plastic utensils that developed a lucrative business making paper cups and straws for U.S. restaurants. But President Trump upended all that with tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports, including paper products. So the company found an alternative, opening a $4 million factory in Monterrey, Mexico, that will soon begin shipping millions of paper straws across the border.

“We had to look for other ways to do business,'” said Fuling Chief Financial Officer Gilbert Lee. The move means the Wenling, China-based company will avoid the tariffs and make up for pricier Mexican labor with lower shipping costs. “Mexico is a very logical and advantageous location for us.”

Fuling isn’t alone. Mexico has seen big gains in shipments to the U.S. in categories where competing Chinese goods were hit with tariffs, everything from poster board to air conditioner parts. In all, U.S. imports of goods from Mexico surged 10 percent to almost $350 billion last year, the fastest growth in seven years. That helped widen America’s trade deficit with Mexico by 15 percent to more than $80 billion. Meanwhile, the growth in shipments from China slowed by about a third.

Mexico’s bonanza underscores the difficulty in trying to win a trade war where companies can shift production or find new sources to avoid tariffs. Despite Trump’s vow to reduce it, the U.S. trade deficit for goods globally hit a record $891 billion last year as tax cuts boosted demand for imports and retaliatory tariffs weighed on American exports. Given Trump’s early attacks on Mexico for taking U.S. jobs, it’s an ironic turn to observers such as factory consultant Alan Russell.

“It’s a case of unintended consequences,” said Russell, chief executive officer of Tecma Group, an El Paso, Texas firm that helps companies open and run factories in Mexico. Interest has never been this high in his 35 years in the industry, he says. “Any company manufacturing in China has had a wake-up call.”

Much of the shift in companies sourcing from Mexico instead of China centers on low value-added items where substitution is easier, according to Jorge Guajardo, a former Mexican ambassador to China. For example, Taskmaster Components has for almost 20 years imported large wheels and tires from China, and assembled them for companies making trailers and recreational vehicles. But tariffs on many of those products pushed the Mount Pleasant, Texas-based company to go hunting for new sourcing. That list now includes Mexico, where it wants to invest in a factory. The U.S. isn’t being considered because Taskmaster hasn’t found a willing partner among the few remaining American manufacturers.
More
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-27/who-is-winning-trump-s-trade-war-with-china-so-far-it-s-mexico?utm_campaign=news&utm_medium=bd&utm_source=applenews

Now back to the future. A realistic view of global energy and global finance.

“All the world is made of faith, and trust, and pixie dust.”

J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan

REPORT | March 2019

THE “NEW ENERGY ECONOMY: AN EXERCISE IN MAGICAL THINKING

Mark P. Mills is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a faculty fellow at Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, where he co-directs an Institute on Manufacturing Science and Innovation. He is also a strategic partner with Cottonwood Venture Partners (an energy-tech venture fund). Previously, Mills cofounded Digital Power Capital, a boutique venture fund, and was chairman and CTO of ICx Technologies, helping take it public in 2007. Mills is a regular contributor to Forbes.com and is author of Work in the Age of Robots (2018). 

He is also coauthor of The Bottomless Well: The Twilight of Fuel, the Virtue of Waste, and Why We Will Never Run Out of Energy (2005). His articles have been published in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Real Clear. Mills has appeared as a guest on CNN, Fox, NBC, PBS, and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. In 2016, Mills was named “Energy Writer of the Year” by the American Energy Society.Earlier, Mills was a technology advisor for Bank of America Securities and coauthor of the Huber-Mills Digital Power Report, a tech investment newsletter. He has testified before Congress and briefed numerous state public-service commissions and legislators. Mills served in the White House Science Office under President Reagan and subsequently provided science and technology policy counsel to numerous private-sector firms, the Department of Energy, and U.S. research laboratories.Early in his career, Mills was an experimental physicist and development engineer at Bell Northern Research (Canada’s Bell Labs) and at the RCA David Sarnoff Research Center on microprocessors, fiber optics, missile guidance, earning several patents for his work. He holds a degree in physics from Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada.

---- Executive Summary, A movement has been growing for decades to replace hydrocarbons, which collectively supply 84% of the world’s energy. It began with the fear that we were running out of oil. 
That fear has since migrated to the belief that, because of climate change and other environmental concerns, society can no longer tolerate burning oil, natural gas, and coal—all of which have turned out to be abundant.

So far, wind, solar, and batteries—the favored alternatives to hydrocarbons—provide about 2% of the world’s energy and 3% of America’s. Nonetheless, a bold new claim has gained popularity: that we’re on the cusp of a tech-driven energy revolution that not only can, but inevitably will, rapidly replace all hydrocarbons.

This “new energy economy” rests on the belief—a centerpiece of the Green New Deal and other similar proposals both here and in Europe—that the technologies of wind and solar power and battery storage are undergoing the kind of disruption experienced in computing and communications, dramatically lowering costs and increasing efficiency. But this core analogy glosses over profound differences, grounded in physics, between systems that produce energy and those that produce information.

In the world of people, cars, planes, and factories, increases in consumption, speed, or carrying capacity cause hardware to expand, not shrink. The energy needed to move a ton of people, heat a ton of steel or silicon, or grow a ton of food is determined by properties of nature whose boundaries are set by laws of gravity, inertia, friction, mass, and thermodynamics—not clever software. 

This paper highlights the physics of energy to illustrate why there is no possibility that the world is undergoing—or can undergo—a near-term transition to a “new energy economy.”

More. Much, much more.

 

A Modest Proposal....

TO: Don @realDonaldTrumpMike @VP, Mitch @McConnellPressKevin @GOPLeaderChuck @SenSchumerNancy @SpeakerPelosi,
Steny @LeaderHoyer,  Lindsey @LindseyGrahamSCAlexndria @AOC,
Sherrod @SenSherrodBrown , Bernie @SenSanders, Rob @senrobportman
Steve @stevenmnuchin1Jay @federalreserve 

I hope you all are well.  As you of course know, after close of business on Friday, Bob finally delivered his long awaited report to our Attorney General.  I'm sure we're all looking forward to reading Bill's abbreviated "nothing to see here" presumably partisan summary of same.  Don, I'm also grateful that you've supported the idea of making the full report public, so we can all finally move on.  America is grateful.  Whether the report indicates we need wholesale regime change/resignations/indictments or a tacit understanding that there is no "there" there, I think we can all agree that we need to make whatever decisions we need to make expeditiously so we can all get this behind us as soon as is practical.

Anyway, even though this report will probably be consuming much your time, and although, I'm sure, difficult for you, I'd like you, for the moment, to set it aside and move on to a different, dare I say, much more important topic.

We have work to do.  We have to save the Western Financial System.

As always, for those of you following my work, you'll know that the really important concepts are in RED below. 
Feel free to skim past my humorous, anecdotal banter if you are pressed for time.

As you know, we Americans have been following your careers (and the careers of your predecessors) closely for quite some time now.  I think we can all agree that your collective progress, in no particular order, on Health Care, Taxation, Education, Environment, Infrastructure, 2nd Amendment issues, Drugs, Immigration, Banking/Financial/Market Reform, Trade, Monetary Policy, Consumer Protection, etc. etc. etc. has indeed been, well,  remarkable.  We appreciate your effort.

To be direct, what's also remarkable, is that in an effort to remain in office, you have all come to believe that through your collective efforts and carefully crafted public relations campaigns, you have been able to appeal to our darkest, most destructive, visceral emotions and fears, convincing roughly half of the American electorate (based on any poll of your choosing) that you and your counterparts on the other side of the aisle are all to be despised and vilified with a passion heretofore unimaginable, by roughly one half of the electorate or the other.  This is an incredible, unthinkable, yet effective achievement and quite a prolific legacy indeed.   You should all be proud.
---- At any other time in history, my reaction to your antics would have been, "Geezzz.....what a mess....but that's Ok.....we've got a strong democracy and another election on the way....American voters are good hearted and wise...we'll find some reasonable people to put in office and we'll get through this..."

Unfortunately, today, delay and "waiting" for the next election is no longer an option.  We are quickly running out of time.  Unless you folks are incredible poker players and you are somehow feverishly working together as a cohesive unit behind the scenes to implement workable versions of the policies I'm going to discuss below, the American dream as we've known it, is doomed to extinction.

That said, I feel compelled, as an American citizen, to speak up.  I'm trying to help you.  I'm trying to help you save Western Civilization.

The Threat to Western Civilization

If you have indeed been following my work, and I know some of you (or your staffs) have been (Google Analytics is a wonderful thing), you are at least suspicious that I might actually be on the right track.  I'll refer you to four recent posts (Below) which you might find informative, but if you already believe that the following thesis (in RED) may indeed be accurate, or at least merit further investigation, there's no need to rehash the concepts here.  I'd refer you to Jay, Steve and their teams, as they have a much greater/better resource/data-set than I have access to.

Dalio's Big Debt Crisis....the FSB Report and Financial War Games....  

Keeping is Simple....China has $50.1 Trillion of Brand New Financial Assets

Twas the Night Before Christmas....

When will Xi Click the "Sell Button"

I'll also cite two excellent and extremely wonkish BIS working papers, written, of course, using generally unintelligible economic jargon (Below) which also reference what we're discussing today.

Triffin: dilemma or myth?

FX swaps and forwards: missing global debt?

Again, no need to wade through these two working papers if you don't have time, I understand you folks are busy.  I'll try to sum both of them up in a sentence or two.  The "Triffin" paper discusses the history of monetary policy, debating the legitimacy of Bob Triffin's "Dilemma", that America at some point will be unable to supply enough "safe" dollar assets and reserve currency to satisfy the global demand for same.  Referenced and described in the "Missing Global Debt" paper, as of 2017 there are at least US$21.4 Trillion (both Balance Sheet and Off-Balance Sheet) of known, non-bank dollar debt lurking outside of the United States. (i.e. out of the FED's purview)  That amount is growing rapidly.  The looming question is whether the FED, when subjected to demands for Eurodollars (and now clandestinely, and more appropriately, "Chinadollars"....as a point of reference, I believe I'm actually coining the phrase "Chinadollars" in this post, since most economists don't believe or understand that they actually exist) could effectively backstop a dollar shortage.
More. Much, much more.

A MODEST PROPOSAL

For preventing the children of poor people in Ireland, from being a burden on their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the publick.

by Dr. Jonathan Swift 1729

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished March

DJIA: 25,929 +54 Down. NASDAQ: 7,729 +94 Down. SP500: 2,834 +53 Down. 

Normally this would suggest more correction still to come, but with President Trump wanting to be judged by the performance of the stock market and the Fed’s Plunge Protection Team now officially part of President Trump’s re-election team, probably the safest action here is fully paid up synthetic double options on most of the major indexes.

No comments:

Post a Comment