“The
nature of the game as it is played is such that the public should realize that
the truth cannot be told by the few who know.”
Jesse
Livermore, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator
Today while we await
Hurricane Florence developments and the next shoe to fall in Trump’s trade war
on NAFTA, NATO, Canada and China, we wonder if Trade War Team Trump have gotten
cold feet? Is U-turn Trump in the process of folding?
As unlikely as that
might seem to most, Trump is under intense lobbying pressure from most of US
industry, and from rising distress in Trumps heartland farm states.Might the arrival of Hurricane Flo, provide
an opportunity to declare victory, and invite interested parties to negotiate a
new world trade trading order?
While I think it’s already
gone past that point, others still see a more favourable outcome.
We open below with the
case for hope.
September 12, 2018 / 5:28 AM
Trump's rhetoric may lead to fairer global
trade: Allianz's El-Erian
(Reuters)
- The trade battles being pursued by U.S. President Donald Trump’s
administration are likely to lead to fairer but still free global trade, said
Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at the Allianz Group, Europe’s largest
insurer.
However, there was still a 1-in-4 chance of a full blown global trade
war that could lead to a hard landing in China and a global recession, El-Erian
told the Reuters Global Markets Forum in an exclusive interview on Wednesday.
There is significant scope for more volatility in emerging markets due
to potential forced selling on the back of stop-losses, El-Erian said.
Contagion risks, though limited for now, could increase “if bad technicals
become bad economics and finance,” with the least liquid markets being in the
greatest danger, he added.
Following are edited excerpts from the conversation:
Q: How much worse can it get for emerging markets (EM) - the Indonesian
rupiah/Indian rupee/Mexican peso - and those economies and how much more can
central banks spend from their reserves?
A: While markets have been calmer recently, or at least less turbulent,
there is still significant scope for further volatility. And this is because
some key market technical are still off-sides. The longer this persists, the
greater the risk that bad technicals contaminate the economics. Currency and interest
rate moves become the transmission mechanism, amplifying the challenges rather
than acting as shock absorbers.
5 things about a U.S.-China trade war that
might surprise investors
By Anneken
TappePublished: Sept 11, 2018 3:11
p.m. ET
China and the U.S., the world’s two largest economies, have
been quarreling over trade for months, engaging in a tit-for-tat tariff battle
and intermittently frightening investors with the prospect of a full-blown
trade war. But the macroeconomic fallout from a worsening of trade relations
might not be as severe as feared, according to Capital Economics.
----And while investors are worrying
about the possible fallout that could hit companies, whole sectors, such as
electronics or agriculture, and other countries caught in the crossfire, the
macroeconomic implications for the U.S. and China appear limited, according to chief
global economist Andrew Kenningham.
He offers five reasons why.
First, as long as “fiscal policy is not tightened, tariffs do not
necessarily reduce aggregate demand,” wrote Kenningham, adding that it might
redirect trade flows to other countries in response to the tariffs rather than
eliminate the demand.
Second, global trade volumes would likely not just drop off either.
“The elasticity of demand for most Chinese exports is quite low, and many
U.S. exports to China could be redirected,” Kenningham said. On top of that, a
sizable chunk of U.S. sanctions on Chinese imports have been offset, at least
in part, by a weaker Chinese yuan USDCNY, -0.0116%USDCNH, +0.1411% against the U.S.
dollar DXY, +0.08% Indeed the dollar-yuan
pair is up more than 5.5% in 2018 so far, and about 7.5% over the past 12
months, according to FactSet.
China markets regulator says trade war does
not benefit U.S. or China
BEIJING
(Reuters) - The head of China’s market regulator said on Tuesday a trade war
does not benefit China or the United States and tensions can only be resolved
through dialogue and negotiation.
Zhang Mao, head of China’s State Administration for Market Regulation,
made the remarks during a meeting with Procter & Gamble President and Chief
Executive Officer David Taylor in Beijing.
Zhang also said China would treat all companies equally, including
foreign firms.
Taylor said Procter & Gamble would continue to increase investment
to provide better products to Chinese consumers.
But in
other developments, mutual assured destruction is still in play. While I hope
for the best outcome to our reckless Trump world trade war, I suspect that what
come next is a recession with plenty of blame on America, followed by
recrimination.
September 11, 2018 / 11:20 AM
China seeks WTO backing for sanctions on
U.S. over dumping duties
GENEVA (Reuters) - China will ask the World Trade Organization (WTO)
next week for permission to impose sanctions on the United States, for
Washington’s non-compliance with a ruling in a dispute over U.S. dumping
duties, a meeting agenda showed on Tuesday.
The request is likely to lead to years of legal wrangling over the case
for sanctions and the amount.
China initiated the dispute in 2013, complaining about U.S. dumping
duties on several industries including machinery and electronics, light
industry, metals and minerals, with an annual export value of up to $8.4
billion (6.44 billion pounds).
It won a WTO ruling in 2016, which was confirmed by an appeal last year.
The case concerned the U.S. Commerce Department’s way of calculating the
amount of “dumping” - Chinese exports that are priced to undercut American-made
goods on the U.S. market.
The U.S. calculation method, known as “zeroing”, tended to increase the
level of U.S. anti-dumping duties on foreign producers and was repeatedly ruled
to be illegal in a series of trade disputes brought to the WTO.
The string of U.S. defeats fuelled U.S. President Donald Trump’s
campaign to reform the WTO. Trump said last month the United States could
withdraw from the WTO if “they don’t shape up”.
China told the WTO last month that the deadline for the United States to
comply with the ruling expired on Aug. 22.
The WTO published an agenda on Tuesday for a meeting of its dispute
settlement body on Sept. 21, showing China planned to take the legal step of
asking for authorisation for sanctions.
Asian stock markets slumped in early trading Wednesday as trade tensions
rose following a report that China is seeking permission from the World Trade
Organization to impose sanctions against the U.S., separate from the tariff
battle between the world’s largest economic powers.
The declines continued for Hong Kong stocks, which hit 14-month lows Tuesday
and saw the Hang Seng Index HSI, -0.31% enter bear-market
territory. It was off a further 0.5% Wednesday, headed toward its sixth
straight decline. Chinese bank stocks were lower, as were Macau casino names.
Sino Biopharma 2922, -11.42% and knitwear
maker Shenzhou 2313, -1.24% , which joined the
Hang Seng on Monday, were on an early pace for a third day of declines. Tech
giant Tencent 0700, +0.06% gave up early
gains after fresh stock-buyback activity Tuesday.
‘I think it will be more severe in terms of the social,
political problems. And I think it will be more difficult to handle ... It
won’t be the same in the terms of the big-bang debt crisis. It’ll be a slower
growing, more constricting sort of debt crisis that I think will have bigger
social implications and bigger international implications.’
Following the markets on both sides of the Atlantic since 1968. A dinosaur, who evolved with the financial system as it was perverted from capitalism to banksterism after the great Nixonian error of abandoning the dollar's link to gold instead of simply revaluing gold. Our money is too important to be left to probity challenged central banksters and crooked politicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment