“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los
Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 L.A. Riots]. Tomorrow they will
be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an
outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real
or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples
of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man
fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will
be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them
by the World Government.”
Henry Kissinger, 1992 Bilderberg Meeting at Evians, France.
Today, as the EUSSR Bilderberger project
increasingly crashes from Merkel’s folly in inviting all the world’s economic
migrants to move to Germany, the secret 1950s US/UK plan for one world
government exposed. The United States of Europe was just supposed to be step
one to world government. Brexit gets better with each passing week.
How a secretive elite created the EU to build a world government
Voters in Britain's referendum need to understand that the European Union was about building a federal superstate from day one
By Prof
Alan Sked 8:30AM GMT 27 Nov 2015
As the debate over the forthcoming EU referendum
gears up, it would be wise perhaps to remember how Britain was led into
membership in the first place. It seems to me that most people have little idea
why one of the victors of the Second World War should have become almost
desperate to join this "club". That's a shame, because answering that
question is key to understanding why the EU has gone so wrong.
-----What about geopolitics? What argument in the cold light of hindsight could have been so compelling as to make us kick our Second-World-War Commonwealth allies in the teeth to join a combination of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Germany and Italy?
Four of
these countries held no international weight whatsoever. Germany was occupied
and divided. France, meanwhile, had lost one colonial war in Vietnam and
another in Algeria. De Gaulle had come to power to save the country from civil
war. Most realists must surely have regarded these states as a bunch of losers.
De Gaulle, himself a supreme realist, pointed out that Britain had democratic
political institutions, world trade links, cheap food from the Commonwealth,
and was a global power. Why would it want to enter the EEC?
The answer is that Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government based on regional federations. He was also a close acquaintance of Jean Monnet, who believed the same. It was therefore Macmillan who became the representative of the European federalist movement in the British cabinet.
In a speech in the House of Commons he even advocated a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) before the real thing had been announced. He later arranged for a Treaty of Association to be signed between the UK and the ECSC, and it was he who ensured that a British representative was sent to the Brussels negotiations following the Messina Conference, which gave birth to the EEC.
In the late 1950s he pushed negotiations concerning a European Free Trade Association towards membership of the EEC. Then, when General de Gaulle began to turn the EEC into a less federalist body, he took the risk of submitting a full British membership application in the hope of frustrating Gaullist ambitions.
His aim, in alliance with US and European proponents of a federalist world order, was to frustrate the emerging Franco-German alliance which was seen as one of French and German nationalism.
Monnet met secretly with Heath and Macmillan on innumerable occasions to facilitate British entry. Indeed, he was informed before the British Parliament of the terms in which the British approach to Europe would be framed.
Despite advice from the Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, that membership would mean the end of British parliamentary sovereignty, Macmillan deliberately misled the House of Commons — and practically everyone else, from Commonwealth statesmen to cabinet colleagues and the public — that merely minor commercial negotiations were involved. He even tried to deceive de Gaulle that he was an anti-federalist and a close friend who would arrange for France, like Britain, to receive Polaris missiles from the Americans. De Gaulle saw completely through him and vetoed the British bid to enter.
Macmillan left Edward Heath to take matters forward, and Heath, along with Douglas Hurd, arranged — according to the Monnet papers — for the Tory Party to become a (secret) corporate member of Monnet’s Action Committee for a United States of Europe.
According to Monnet’s chief aide and biographer, Francois Duchene, both the Labour and Liberal Parties later did the same. Meanwhile the Earl of Gosford, one of Macmillan’s foreign policy ministers in the House of Lords, actually informed the House that the aim of the government’s foreign policy was world government.
Monnet’s Action Committee was also given financial backing by the CIA and the US State Department. The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe.
Today, this is still the case. Powerful international lobbies are already at work attempting to prove that any return to democratic self-government on the part of Britain will spell doom. American officials have already been primed to state that such a Britain would be excluded from any free trade deal with the USA and that the world needs the TTIP trade treaty which is predicated on the survival of the EU.
Fortunately, Republican candidates in the USA are becoming Eurosceptics and magazines there like The National Interest are publishing the case for Brexit. The international coalition behind Macmillan and Heath will find things a lot more difficult this time round — especially given the obvious difficulties of the Eurozone, the failure of EU migration policy and the lack of any coherent EU security policy.
Most importantly, having been fooled once, the British public will be much more difficult to fool again.
Alan Sked is the original founder of Ukip and professor of International History at the London School of Economics. He is presently collecting material for a book he hopes to publish on Britain's experience of the EU
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times,
Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our
meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years … It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had
been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is
more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller, 1991 Bilderberg Meeting at Baden, Germany (a meeting also
attended by Bill Clinton)
No comments:
Post a Comment