Showing posts with label the next Lehman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the next Lehman. Show all posts

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

Flood Inflation Push.

Baltic Dry Index. 1773

LIR Gold Target by 2019: $30,000. Revised due to QE.

"I never think of the future. It comes soon enough."

Albert Einstein.

Are Australia’s floods about to give a big push to global inflation? My guess is that the flooding will, with unpredictable consequences around the world. Stay long precious metals, an unexpected bout of food and fuel inflation just might trigger “the next Lehman”. Austerity packages, higher taxes and higher food and fuel inputs, yet more reasons for the Fed to push stock prices higher. After all, no one else is a buyer in these circumstances. Below, the latest news from Australia.

JANUARY 4, 2011

Flooding Worsens in Australia

MELBOURNE—The Australian military began rushing supplies to a town slowly being swamped by floodwaters Monday as authorities warned that floods devastating large parts of Queensland state are set to worsen in some areas.

A proper assessment of damage is expected only after the floodwaters, which follow torrential rains associated with the La Nina weather pattern, recede. But many expect damage to run to billions of dollars.

Floods affecting an area the size of France and Germany combined have forced thousands of residents to flee their homes, impacting as many as 200,000 people.

---- Coal mining, haulage and export is the major industry in central Queensland, a major global source of coking coal used in steelmaking. Central Queensland and the Hunter Valley in New South Wales are the heartland of Australia's US$51 billion-a-year coal export industry.

The floods have forced many of the biggest miners—including BHP Billiton Ltd., Rio Tinto Ltd. and Anglo American PLC—to stop production and cancel deliveries to key customers.

"We have three quarters of our coal fields unable to operate and unable to supply markets," Queensland Premier Anna Bligh told Australian Broadcasting Corp. television.

"There is likely to be a significant long-term effect of that, not only nationally, but also internationally," she said, noting the state provides half of the world's supply of coking coal, a key ingredient in steelmaking. "So there is a remarkable problem out there in the mining industry...They will have a long, slow climb back to full production," she said.

"We are going to see an economic impact, there's no doubt about that," Prime Minister Julia Gillard told ABC Radio Monday. "When floodwaters recede, we're going to see a lot of damage to roads, to bridges, to schools, to the community facilities that everybody relies on. We can't assess what that's going to cost until we can see the damage."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704735304576058450659548280.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hpp_MIDDLETopStories

Australian floods raise fears of wheat shortage

Severe flooding in Australia could lead to an increase in the price of bread on supermarket shelves due to global shortages of wheat.

By James Hall 7:00AM GMT 04 Jan 2011

US wheat futures rose heavily yesterday as concerns grew that Australian wheat growers will be unable to deliver their harvests as a result of the devastation. Australia is the world's fourth largest exporter of wheat after the USA, Canada and Russia.

At the Chicago Board of Trade, the price of wheat for March delivery rose over 3pc, at one point hitting $8.25 (£5.30) a bushel, the highest since last August. Warnings over impending cold weather in the US were also cited as reasons for the rise.

----The Queensland area of Australia has been hit by calamitous flooding. Andrew Fraser, Queensland's State Treasurer, described the floods as a "disaster of biblical proportions". Water is covering land the size of France and Germany. It is expected to reach over 30 feet deep in some areas in coming days.

---- Early last month it was estimated that there were eight to 10 million tonnes of wheat and barley crops still waiting to be harvested in paddocks in Queensland and New South Wales. Local reports last month said that the rain may have cost grain growers in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland between $1bn (£660m) and $2bn in lost revenue.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8237560/Australian-floods-raise-fears-of-wheat-shortage.html

Next, “the next Lehman” does the first of many put back deals on its dodgy “triple-A” mortgage backed securities. The market reacted as if this is the end of the put backs rather than the start. Not to worry though, BOA can always get more cash from the Fed. There’s plenty more where that comes from. Stay long precious metals.

JANUARY 3, 2011, 10:48 A.M. ET

Bank of America to Buy Back Bad Loans From Fannie, Freddie

Bank of America Corp. expects to take a provision of about $3 billion in the fourth quarter to buy back bad loans from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that were issued by its troubled Countrywide Financial unit.

The move represents the latest effort by the Charlotte-based banking giant, which acquired mortgage-originator Countrywide in 2008, to respond to the housing crisis. Countrywide's mortgages turned into some of the worst mortgages issued during the crisis and, ever since Bank of America bought the lender, the bank has had to handle growing loan losses.

The lender also said it has received confirmation from the Federal Reserve that the company fulfilled its commitment to boost its equity by $3 billion, a condition of its repurchase $45 billion in preferred stock in December 2009 acquired as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. It faced a year-end deadline to raise the equity and sought to raise the capital by selling assets.

If it hadn't done so, it might have had to pay some employees' bonuses in stock instead of cash. The bank also had warned investors it might need to make a dilutive share offering to raise the capital. Instead, it sold such assets as 51.2 million shares in BlackRock Inc. and the right to purchase additional shares in China Construction Bank Corp.

As part of the loan repurchases, Bank of America's home loans and insurance business is expected to post a $2 billion writedown in the quarter. The bank said the charge will have no impact on its Tier 1 or tangible equity ratios.

"These actions resolve substantial legacy issues in the best interest of our shareholders," Chief Executive Brian Moynihan said. "Our goals remain the same: put these issues behind us; focus on serving customers and clients; and continue to help distressed homeowners facing difficult times."

The agreement includes a cash payment of $1.28 billion to Freddie and $1.52 billion to Fannie, both of which were made Friday. Executives from both companies said the agreement is in the best interests of all parties.

Last week, Allstate Corp. sued Countrywide over $700 million in residential mortgage-backed securities in which the insurer had invested. The suit contains similar allegations other investors have raised with mortgage creators, namely that lax underwriting standards are to blame for the collapse of the investment vehicles.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704111504576059443159161336.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hpp_LEFTTopWhatNews

Moynihan Fights Fires at Bank of America Amid Investor Doubt in Book Value

By Hugh Son - Jan 4, 2011 2:01 AM GMT

Brian T. Moynihan spent his first year as Bank of America Corp.’s chief executive officer putting out fires smoldering from the financial crisis. In 2011, he’ll do it all over again.

Since succeeding Kenneth D. Lewis on Jan. 1, 2010, Moynihan, 51, has struggled to stanch loan losses and a surge of litigation at the biggest U.S. lender while trying to mend relations with customers, regulators and investors. He paid $2.8 billion last week to government-owned companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to settle claims the bank sold them defective mortgages, a major step toward resolving liabilities taken on with the 2008 purchase of Countrywide Financial Corp.

---- The company’s shares were down 11 percent last year, the second worst in the 24-company KBW Bank Index. Only Bridgeport, Connecticut-based People’s United Financial Inc. fared worse. Citigroup rose 43 percent. Bank of America, which repaid $45 billion in U.S. bailout funds in 2009, traded by year-end for about 60 percent of book value, reflecting investor doubts that assets are properly stated. The industry average is 94 percent.

“They’re the most troubled large bank -- it’s an unfortunate place to be,” said Christopher Whalen, a former Federal Reserve Bank of New York analyst and co-founder of Institutional Risk Analytics in Torrance, California.

The announcement yesterday of last week’s settlement, which Whalen said was “clearly a gift,” sent Bank of America up 6.4 percent to $14.19 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, the biggest increase in almost eight months.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-04/moynihan-fights-fires-at-bank-of-america-amid-investor-doubt-in-book-value.html

Below, today’s Journal on “let’s make a deal” and US banks. According to the article, it seems to be “let’s make a sweetheart deal”, given the level of fraud and perjury involved all round.

Foreclosure Deals to Start With Big Lenders, Iowa Says

By Margaret Cronin Fisk and Prashant Gopal - Jan 4, 2011 5:01 AM GMT

The five largest loan servicers, including Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., may be the first to settle with the 50 state attorneys general probing foreclosure practices, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said.

No settlements have been reached yet, Miller said yesterday in a phone interview. The other three are Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc., said Miller, the leader of the 50-state investigation. The five have 59 percent of the U.S. market, Miller said.

“What we’re looking at is five separate agreements with the five largest servicers,” Miller said. “We’re still a ways away” from reaching agreements, he said. “We’re working very hard to figure out what should be in the settlement.”

All 50 U.S. states are investigating whether banks and loan servicers used false documents and signatures to justify hundreds of thousands of foreclosures. The probe, announced Oct. 13, came after JPMorgan and Ally Financial’s GMAC mortgage unit said they would stop repossessions in 23 states where courts supervise home seizures, and Bank of America, the largest U.S. lender, froze foreclosures nationwide.

Tom Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan in New York, declined to comment. Shannon Bell, a spokeswoman for New York-based Citigroup, declined to comment. Gina Proia of Detroit-based Ally declined to comment. Shirley Norton, a spokeswoman for Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America, declined to comment.

---- The probe has since widened to include other mortgage practices, with attorneys general suggesting a potential resolution should include improving the loan modification process, barring foreclosures when people are modifying loans and creating a general fund to compensate homeowners who may have been victims of wrongful foreclosures.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-03/state-foreclosure-settlements-to-start-with-biggest-banks-iowa-ag-says.html

In EU news, the Brussels bigwigs don’t like Hungary running the EU presidency for the next six months. A season of clashes between the two, seems likely, as more and more EU nations go off the rails.

JANUARY 4, 2011

European Probe Fuels Tensions With Hungary

BUDAPEST—The European Union is investigating the legality of special "crisis" taxes imposed by Hungary on a handful of industries amid an escalating feud between the country's new government and its increasingly outspoken critics elsewhere in Europe.

Tensions have mounted as Hungary takes over the rotating presidency of the EU and could complicate the regional bloc's efforts to make progress on a series of important measures aimed at bolstering the Continent's economic recovery.

The probe of the taxes, which have fallen most heavily on large, foreign companies, comes on top of criticism of a new Hungarian media law by officials of other EU states and members of the European Parliament, who say it goes against the EU's commitment to press freedom.

Hungary's government has dismissed the complaints, saying the new temporary taxes, which are to last through the end of 2012, and the media law are in line with the spirit and the letter of EU treaties and regulations.

----- Senior European officials, including the head of the EU's executive branch, José Manuel Barroso, and other members of the European Commission are to meet with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban this week in Budapest to mark the start of Hungary's six-month presidency.

The agenda for the talks hasn't been set, but "it is very likely that someone will raise these questions," Olivier Bailly, an EU spokesman, said Monday.

In some ways the dispute between Budapest and Brussels goes to the heart of a debate over the proper distribution of power between national governments and the central authorities of the European Union.

"The EU basically has no right to interfere" in these sorts of policy decisions, says Hungary's Mr. Kovacs. The media law, for example, he says, "is a domestic matter."

More.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704111504576059353833867440.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hpp_LEFTTopStories#articleTabs%3Darticle

"The international monetary order is more precarious by far today than it was in 1929. Then, gold was international money, incorruptible, unmanageable, and unchangeable. Today, the U.S. dollar serves as the international medium of exchange, managed by Washington politicians and Federal Reserve officials, manipulated from day to day, and serving political goals and ambitions. This difference alone sounds the alarm to all perceptive observers."

Hans F. Sennholz

At the Comex silver depositories Monday, final figures were: Registered 45.71 Moz, Eligible 58.83 Moz, Total 104.54 Moz.

+++++

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

No Crooks today, just this interesting news out of China. China, it seems, is joining the ranks of those nations with a nuclear recycling ability. I wonder what they do with the recovered plutonium?

China Claims Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Breakthrough

Monday, January 3rd, 2011 at 7:00 am UTC

Chinese state television says scientists have achieved a technological breakthrough that will ensure the country's supply of nuclear fuel for the next 3,000 years.

State television said Monday the breakthrough was achieved at a China National Nuclear Corporation facility in the remote Gobi desert. The new technology makes it possible to re-use irradiated fuel from nuclear reactors, meaning the country can obtain 60 times the value from the same amount of fuel.

China is planning a major expansion of nuclear power as part of its drive to cut back greenhouse emissions by reducing its heavy reliance on coal.

However officials are concerned that they will be increasingly dependent on foreign sources of uranium. Without a reprocessing program like that announced Monday, China's uranium reserves would be expected to last for about 50 to 70 years.

http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2011/01/03/china-claims-nuclear-fuel-reprocessing-breakthrough/

"All previous attempts to base money solely on intangibles such as credit or government edict or fiat have ended in inflationary panic and disaster."

Donald Hoppe

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished December:

DJIA: +171 Down 7. NASDAQ: +238 Down 9. SP500: +165 Down 2.

The bull market (or bear market rally) that commenced on Nasdaq on 30/4/09 at 1717 has ended. (30/5/09 SP 500 at 919, 30/5/09 DJIA 8500.) While the indicators can flip flop at market turns, this action is rare on the slow monthly indicators. December is the seventh down month, but the downward momentum has virtually stopped. I would put on (purchased) synthetic double options here for a breakout in either direction. Professional traders would adopt much more risky granted option strategies.

Friday, 27 August 2010

Fatally Flawed – The Next Lehman.

Baltic Dry Index. 2703 -70

LIR Gold Target by 2019: $3,000.

A large Bank is exactly the place where a vain and shallow person in authority, if he be a man of gravity and method, as such men often are, may do infinite evil in no long time, and before he is detected. If he is lucky enough to begin at a time of expansion in trade, he is nearly sure not to be found out till the time of contraction has arrived, and then very large figures will be required to reckon the evil he has done.

Walter Bagehot. Lombard Street. 1873.

British banks are unsafe!!! So thinks a man who ought to know. Below the Telegraph covers the fatally flawed UK accounting rules. The next Lehman is out there and probably British.

The whole history of civilization is strewn with creeds and institutions which were invaluable at first, and deadly afterwards.

Walter Bagehot.

UK bank accounting rules 'fatally flawed', warns influential watchdog

The Government has been warned of a “regulatory fiasco” in which British banks have apparently adhered to flawed reporting standards for more than five years.

By Louise Armitstead Published: 6:00AM BST 26 Aug 2010

An influential watchdog has written to the Department of Business listing a catalogue of staggering regulatory errors that allegedly contributed to the collapse of several banks in 2008 – and still threatens the system today.

While reviewing the proposed expansion of the International Financial Reporting Standards for accounting, Tim Bush, a member of the “Urgent Issues Task Force” that scrutinises the work of the Accounting Standards Board (ASB), claims to have uncovered “fatal” and “dangerous” flaws in the system.

The City veteran has argued that applied to banks, the standards “produced false profits and overstated capital” which have “misled creditors, misled shareholders, the Bank of England, FSA and others”.

In a devastating assessment, Mr Bush alleges the regulations, and specifically the way they have been implemented in the UK and Ireland, have led to “mistakes [being made] of such severity that it is difficult to overstate”.

His letter, written on August 19 and sent to the BIS as well as the ASB and other accounting bodies, claims:

* The ASB has “not fully understood” the IFRS accounting standards and implemented them in a way that even contravenes the Companies Act. As a result, UK and Irish banks have wrongly relied on a different – and flawed – financial reporting system from the rest of Europe.

* The application distorted bank’s company accounts, giving “false assurances”, and hampered the directors and regulators from seeing the build-up of leverage and other risks.

* The system is still “causing direct business risk” in the banks and will do the same if applied to other companies too.

* The dangers are set to spread to small and medium-sized businesses under proposals to roll-out the accounting system further.

According to Mr Bush, who was formerly a fund manager at Hermes, the root of the “fatal flaw” lies in the adoption of the new IFRS accounting system to work alongside the Companies Act, whose rules had applied to financial reporting in Britain since 1879.

Although the IFRS system was introduced in the wake of the Enron scandal to combat accounting fraud, it has been widely criticised by accounting experts across Europe.

Mr Bush has argued that the standards preclude the principle of “prudence”, or the likelihood of money being repaid, disguising, for instance, a bad loan until it actually fails. But Mr Bush has claimed that while European banks applied the standard at group level, Britain’s ASB said that all bank units and subsidiaries should use the same measures, too.

The standards also applied to the Republic of Ireland, where the ASB is one of the last remaining British bodies to have any jurisdiction.

In his letter, Mr Bush wrote: “Although IFRS had been rolled out across the EU, the UK and Ireland implemented it so extensively that the impact was different. It has been a ‘double dose’ to the extent of being a deadly dose, by removing what had underpinned banking solvency for over 120 years.”

He said the system produced figures that hid instability in banks, so that directors and regulators of the banks could look at the audited figures and conclude that banks were not just solvent but had excess cash.

As for banks in the lead-up to the financial crisis: “They did not have the capital that they presented, and they were not going concerns. The true situation was that business models were loss-making and actually consuming capital.”

-----He said the system is still flawed and urged the Government to scrap plans to extend the standards. “In my view, the direction that the ASB took, and is still taking, is… causing direct business risk.”

He added: “The proposed further roll-out of full IFRS and the IFRS for SMEs has the same fundamental flaws as what has gone so badly wrong in the banks, a level of apparent compliance that undershoots what the law requires. It is difficult in the extreme to envisage Parliament knowingly assenting to a model of company accounts that dilutes the responsibilities of auditors at the same time as offering less for directors, creditors and the wider public interest.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/7964816/UK-bank-accounting-rules-fatally-flawed-warns-influential-watchdog.html

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way

A Tale of Two Cities. Charles Dickens.

Normal service resumes on Monday. Check with the blog for the weekend update. Have a great weekend everyone.

Thursday, 10 June 2010

BP – The Next Lehman?

Baltic Dry Index. 3514 -65
LIR Gold Target by 2019: $3,000.

World Cup Odds. Who will be World Campion 2010?

http://world-cup.betting-directory.com/

"The diligent farmer plants trees, of which he himself will never see the fruit."

Cicero

Early last month we asked “Can BP survive?” We thought that they could but not in their present form, with BP America’s profits being diverted and assets possibly pledged against years of GOM mitigation and litigation to come. At the time, complacency ruled in faraway London, where the unfolding disaster in the Gulf of Mexico was greatly under-appreciated and great faith was placed in BP’s abilities to quickly stop the blowout well in accordance with their pre-drilling emergency plan. Misplaced faith as it turns out, and I suspect that BP themselves in Houston always knew that only a relief well was a viable option to cap the well. Below, Bloomberg on yesterday’s developments.

The UK is better placed than in the past to deal with these challenges.

Gordon Brown. On Lehman Brothers.

BP Trades as Junk, Credit-Default Swaps Invert: Credit Markets

June 10 (Bloomberg) -- BP Plc bonds and credit-default swaps are trading as if the energy company has lost its investment-grade rating as costs mount from the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

BP’s $3 billion of 5.25 percent notes due in 2013 fell as low as a record 89.94 cents yesterday, pushing the yield to 7.57 percentage points more than Treasuries. The spread compares with an average of 7.26 percentage points for junk bonds, Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes show. The cost to protect $10 million of BP debt for a year with credit-default swaps almost doubled to $512,000, according to CMA DataVision. It was $29,000 on April 30.

“That’s just pure out panic,” said Michael Donelan, who oversees $3.5 billion of bonds at Ryan Labs Inc. in New York. “That’s like, ‘Get me out of here now.’ What the market is pricing in now is increased regulatory oversight and heavy, heavy punitive damages.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY4OfLFcxQGE&pos=3

As a political football in this November’s USA critical mid term election, like the Great Vampire Squid busy doing “God’s work” raping and pillaging their American clients, enemies, and anyone else unfortunate enough merely to stumble across their path, BP has gone beyond the point of no return, in my opinion. Unlike the Great Vampire Squid, BP hasn’t inserted it’s alumni deep into every aspect of western government across G-6 of the G-7. BP is virtually friendless in a world of bent politicians seeking cheap re-election and great vampire squids sensing the ultimate short opportunity. BP is starting to smell like the next Lehman. Below, leading oil investment banker Matt Simmons suggests that BP’s board will soon wake up and realize that a Chapter 11 filing is inevitable. A new 2010 development to banksterism not capitalism, as media and political hype have found a new game for the decade. After a near miss with Toyota, have the vandals and squids made a direct hit on BP. Like Matt Simmons, I rather suspect that they have.

Let's recognize that this is a once-in-a-half-century, probably once-in-a-century type of event. There's no question that this is in the process of outstripping anything I've seen and it still is not resolved and it still has a way to go...

Alan Greenspan. On Lehman Brothers.

BP hit by doubts over ability to pay for costs of oil spill

June 9, 2010, 6:58 p.m. EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- BP PLC shares slumped Wednesday, leaving its market value halved in fewer than seven weeks, while the oil giant's bonds were crushed as questions mounted over whether it can afford to clean up the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history.

Oil-industry insider Matt Simmons, head of the Texas-based, energy-focused investment bank Simmons & Co., told Fortune magazine Wednesday that BP will run out of cash from lawsuits, cleanup costs and other expenses.

"They have about a month before they declare Chapter 11" bankruptcy, Simmons said.

"One really smart thing that [President Barack] Obama did was about three weeks ago, he forced BP CEO Tony Hayward to put in writing that BP would pay for every dollar of the cleanup," he added. "But there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the Gulf of Mexico. Once BP realizes the extent of this, my guess is that they'll panic and go into Chapter 11."

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bps-market-value-halves-as-spill-costs-loom-large-2010-06-09

BP pits fears against assets

June 9, 2010, 7:12 p.m. EDT

Commentary: Steep selloff clears out bargain-hunters

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Shares of BP PLC turned treacherous Wednesday.

The stock tumbled nearly 16% to $29.20 in heavy volume; 240 million shares, eight times the three-month daily average, traded hands.

With this latest setback, stock has now lost half its value since April 22, the day the Deepwater Horizon drill rig disappeared into the Gulf of Mexico, replaced by a plume of crude. Read more about BP's solvency worries.

Two weeks ago, BP was clearly a "buy." The oil spill is tragic, but the stock's initial hammering seemed a gross overreaction. After all, BP is one of the biggest, publicly traded oil companies engaged in one of the most profitable businesses in the world.

Many investors, smelling a sweet deal, moved into the shares, confident BP would cap the well and resume business as usual. On May 27, BP shares rallied 7%, riding high on widespread speculation that the "top kill" would do the trick.

Many of those same investors bailed out Wednesday, their confidence shaken by visions of other corporate giants swiftly undone by a calamitous chain of events.

-----BP is a real oil company, with real assets in the ground -- literally. It sits on vast petroleum reserves around the world, runs huge refining and transport operations and makes billions of dollars a year from international operations.

If BP goes down, it would be because investors fear insurmountable liabilities from the Gulf spill. Fear is now clearly a powerful force in how this plays out. But so are assets.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bp-selloff-pits-fears-against-assets-2010-06-09

We end on the next Lehman with the scale of the disaster only now starting to become apparent. Taking out BP, takes out a pretty large slice of HMGs UK government taxes, UK pensioners assets and cash flow, and with roughly 40% of BP now owned by North American shareholders, does a pretty good number on US investors too. All of these are people who rightly or wrongly believed they were making informed decisions to invest in a oil exploration and production company who’s upper liability was capped under US law. Inappropriate as that may be, faced with back door expropriation, BP’s board now needs to start playing hardball back. They have a duty to their shareholders to do nothing less.

AIG was until recently the world's largest insurance company. It provides over a hundred billion dollars of capital to banks, and it is in trouble too.

These really are unprecedented days. This is not stress testing, this could be testing where the failure point lies.

John Moulton. Alchemy Partners.

Barack Obama's attacks on BP hurting British pensioners

Barack Obama has been accused of holding "his boot on the throat" of British pensioners after his attacks on BP were blamed for wiping billions off the company's value.

By Louise Armitstead and Myra Butterworth Published: 10:12PM BST 09 Jun 2010

City investors said the president was jeopardising the pensions of millions with his "excessive" criticism of the energy company following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Before the accident on April 20, BP was Britain's biggest company, with a stock market value of £122 billion. Since then, £49 billion has been wiped off its value.

On Wednesday, BP's share price fell a further 17.35p to 391.55p – representing a 40 per cent drop on the 655p price of a share two months ago.

Experts have said that the clean-up costs of the oil spill will run to between £10 billion and £20 billion but the biggest cost to the company is from investors dumping stock for fear of BP being further punished by the US Government.

Those fears have been heightened by Mr Obama's increasingly aggressive rhetoric towards BP, which some investors see as an attempt to deflect criticism of his own handling of the crisis. Last month, a White House spokesman said the President's job was to keep his "boot on the throat" of the company.

In the past week, Mr Obama, who insists on referring to BP by its former name British Petroleum, has suggested that its chief executive, Tony Hayward, would have been sacked if he worked for him.

BP's position at the top of the London Stock Exchange and its previous reliability have made it a bedrock
of almost every pension fund in the country, meaning its value is crucial to millions of workers. The firm's dividend payments, which amount to more than £7 billion a year, account for £1 in every £6 paid out in dividends to British pension pots.

BP is so concerned about Mr Obama's power to affect share value that it has urged David Cameron to appeal to the White House on its behalf. Downing Street, however, has refused to get involved. "We need to ensure that BP is not unfairly treated – it is not some bloodless corporation," said one of Britain's top fund managers. "Hit BP and a lot of people get hit. UK pension money becomes a donation to the US government and the lawyers at the expense of Mrs Jones and other pension funds."

Mark Dampier of the financial services company Hargreaves Lansdown said: "[Mr Obama] is playing to the gallery but is not bringing a solution any closer. Obama has his boot on the throat of British pensioners. There is no point in bashing BP all the time, it's not helpful. It is a terrible situation, but having the American president on your back is not going to get it all cleared up any quicker."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7815713/Barack-Obamas-attacks-on-BP-hurting-British-pensioners.html

The President and US government on present course, will merely force BP into endless expensive rounds of court battles. Lawyers not the affected will eventually end up the only winners. If the laws were inadequate, that is the fault of whoever wrote the laws. If States had inadequate disaster cleanup response plans, that is the fault of the States. If they chose to rely on the Federal Government that is a knowing decision they took. If the States had inadequate compensation schemes for their citizens, while later seeking relief and reimbursement for valid claims via the courts, that is a fault of local politicians. Like BP who didn’t insure, the States could have taken out disaster insurance for their citizens. If Federal regulation of deep water drilling is now proving lax, that is a fault of the US Federal government, its rich to blame the companies that complied with existing laws.

If BP’s going down they have nothing left to lose by fighting back, not that will cap the well any sooner. If this turns into an ecological calamity, it’s a calamity that was entirely foreseeable in advance. There were many writers and experts in the field who said we had inadequate technology for the challenge. In the rush to make money from oil and in the rush to reduce American dependence on foreign oil, no one wanted to pay much attention to delaying the drilling for studies of the challenge. If BP’s board does get some backbone and start defending their shareholders interest, BP will probably still likely lose out in the end. It’s hard to see US courts siding with BP vs the whipped up mob. However, what happens to BP can happen to any other oil company. Can happen to any other Toyota, to any other “next Lehman.” Simply put, in a changed environment like this, the valuation of most large multi-national companies is now grossly overstated. An Exxon, a Shell, a Halliburton, a Toyota, a Ford, a nuclear power operator and many others, are now all too dangerous to hold at current values.

Should Government Be Responsible For Corporate Disasters?

There has always been, and will always be, natural disasters. And since the moment our long-dead ancestors stood upright there have been, and will always be, man-made disasters. For millions of years volcanoes erupted, earthquakes shattered, rivers flooded and only those unfortunate souls who stood at the base of the volcano, the crack of a fault line, or the banks of a river were affected by Mother Earth's indigestion.

But now we live in a technological era, where we can watch devastation and suffering from thousands of miles away in the comfort of our own home. Mix that up-to-the-second technology with the fundamental American right to criticize corporations, as well as our elected officials, and it's no surprise we're hearing such vitriolic missives about the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

A month into the oil spill, the blame game has begun and while there are plenty of parties at fault, the broader message of how the government's response is slow doesn't quite make sense. Indeed, the New York Times is debating: Is this Obama's spill now? And it really boils down to a matter of opinion: Do you believe the company who owns the rig is responsible for clean up or do you believe the government is responsible for the clean up?

To compound that message, we're hearing, "This is President Obama's Katrina." Indeed, as Manny Ortiz, senior lobbyist at Washington, D.C agency Quin, Gillespie & Associates told PRNewser, "They (Republicans) want to create the notion that this has been mishandled."

While there are some parallels between Katrina and the BP oil spill, they are superficial.

For example, both are in the same location: Gulf of Mexico. And everything from the destruction caused by both to the aid they require - economic, recovery and rebuilding - is something most can't quite fathom. Katrina was a hurricane that swept in and did damage because of shoddy engineering, and the BP oil spill is discharging thousands of barrels a day into the water because of, well, shoddy engineering. But that's about it. Oh, and apparently the government's response to both was way too slow. Which begs the question, why does the government need to respond to a company's problem?

There are some who are saying that the Obama administration's lack of response (and/or help) is similar to that of President Bush's slow response to Katrina. But looking closer at these sentiments, it's hard not to see the political football bouncing in numerous directions:

The BP oil spill was because of failure of a company (actually, several companies) in a poorly regulated industry.

People are calling for the government to step in, but the government doesn't have the resources to fix it. You can't complain about lack of government resources when you don't pay your taxes (47% of U.S households don't pay income tax), which finance those necessary resources - both in the labor and in parts. And you certainly can't complain about lack of government resources when you have a political ideology that believes the government that governs least, governs best.

More.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sternberg/should-government-be-resp_b_592093.html

We end for the day with all every American needs to know about owning gold for protection from the out of control, crooked central banksters and bent politicians. As America goes European socialist 1960-70s s style and heaps corporate socialism and banksterism on top, comrades it’s time to get long physical gold and silver against the end of fiat currency. Coming soon to a McDonalds near you, the starting wage of $1 million a year.

"Until government administrators can so identify the interests of government with those of the people and refrain from defrauding the masses through the device of currency depreciation for the sake of remaining in office, the wiser ones will prefer to keep as much of their wealth in the most stable and marketable forms possible - forms which only the precious metals provide."

Elgin Groseclose

U.S debt to rise to $19.6 trillion by 2015

June 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. debt will top $13.6 trillion this year and climb to an estimated $19.6 trillion by 2015, according to a Treasury Department report to Congress.

The report that was sent to lawmakers Friday night with no fanfare said the ratio of debt to the gross domestic product would rise to 102 percent by 2015 from 93 percent this year.

"The president's economic experts say a 1 percent increase in GDP can create almost 1 million jobs, and that 1 percent is what experts think we are losing because of the debt's massive drag on our economy," said Republican Representative Dave Camp, who publicized the report.

He was referring to recent testimony by University of Maryland Professor Carmen Reinhart to the bipartisan fiscal commission, which was created by President Barack Obama to recommend ways to reduce the deficit, which said debt topping 90 percent of GDP could slow economic growth.

The U.S. debt has grown rapidly with the economic downturn and government spending for the Wall Street bailout, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the economic stimulus. The rising debt is contributing to voter unrest ahead of the November congressional elections in which Republicans hope to regain control of Congress.

The total U.S. debt includes obligations to the Social Security retirement program and other government trust funds. The amount of debt held by investors, which include China and other countries as well as individuals and pension funds, will rise to an estimated $9.1 trillion this year from $7.5 trillion last year.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN088462520100608

"The paper standard is self-destructive."

Hans F. Sennholz

At the Comex silver depositories Wednesday, final figures were: Registered 52.34 Moz, Eligible 65.28 Moz, Total 117.63 Moz.

+++++

Crooks and Scoundrels Corner.

The bent, the seriously bent, and the totally doubled over.

Today it’s more news from Europe’s stitch up politicians. Forget the unelected nobody Herman van Rompuy and his part time “European Foreign Minister” Baroness “whats-it,” they at least are good for laughs and the stock-in-trade of stand up comedians specializing in political satire, today it’s focus time on Euroland’s paymasters and the Circus ringmaster who wants to hire many more socialist acts. Below, Der Spiegel covers Europe’s Laurel and Hardy tackling the crisis on the ever disappearing Euro. Fiat Euros anyone? Europeans have even more reason than American’s to get long precious metals. Is everyone really sure that there’s any gold and silver somewhere on the custodians books and vaults to back up all the ETFs? Tomorrow will not be like today which was like yesterday. The great dollar era of 1945-2000 has ended. Brought down eventually by fiat currency 1971 to ????

"In a country whose currency is not convertible into gold, inflation leads to its continuous devaluation in terms of foreign currencies."

Michael A. Heilperin

The World from Berlin

'Does Angela Merkel Still Trust Nicolas Sarkozy?'

06/09/2010

Angela Merkel's last-minute decision to cancel a dinner with Nicolas Sarkozy this week has left many questioning the state of relations between the two countries. But German papers warn that the common currency can only be saved through their leadership.

By the time Angela Merkel unexpectedly cancelled her planned dinner meeting with Nicolas Sarkozy on Monday, the French press corps had already landed at Berlin's Tegel Airport. In Paris and Berlin, the surprise move triggered endless speculation over why the chancellor had cancelled -- was she doing it to protect Sarkozy from a prickly domestic political debate over budget cuts or out of irritation over their differences on how to address the euro crisis?

The surprise decision came the same day the chancellor announced a contentious package of savings measures that would slash her government's budget by around €80 billion ($95 billion) by 2014 to meet the requirements of the European Union's stability pact as well as the so-called "debt brake" amendment to the German constitution requiring a balanced budget by 2016.

In Germany and France, the cancellation is being perceived in the media as reflective of the growing divide between Paris and Berlin over how best to deal with the sovereign debt and euro crisis. Merkel has said she would like to adopt a savings package that would serve as a model for other European countries and show the way out of a crisis that has pressured the euro.

But in Paris, French government officials have rejected adopting the kind of heavy austerity measures being championed in Berlin. France's government minister in charge of stimulus efforts, Patrick Devedjian, on Tuesday warned against similar measures for his country, saying it "would be dangerous because it risks killing growth."

The two countries are also split on how to save the euro. Sarkozy is pushing for a euro zone economic governance which would include only the 16 euro zone member states in tighter coordination of economic policies. Merkel, however, would like to see greater economic policy coordination between all 27 EU member states and has called for the European Council to establish an economic policy forum. So far, neither side has shown a willingness to budge.

The French media were highly critical of Monday's cancellation. Liberation wrote, "Does Angela Merkel still trust Nicolas Sarkozy? It is extremely rare that a bilateral meeting is cancelled only a few hours before it is to take place." And French paper of record Le Monde wrote that Merkel was "not willing" to discuss the issues with Sarkozy on Monday night. "That's too bad," the paper wrote, "Nothing is possible without agreement between the two." Liberation has also reported that Sarkozy has stated "privately" that he is frustrated with Merkel's hesitance and delays in moving to prop up the euro. Speaking on French radio, former French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, said the cancellation was a sign that Germany "has lost its faith in France."

In Berlin, the government has downplayed the kerfuffle, saying the French press speculation about a rift between Merkel and Sarkozy is "untrue." The German daily Frankfurter Rundschau claims that officials speaking off the record said Merkel was seeking to spare Sarkozy from Germany's "domestic showdown" over the savings package as well as possible uncomfortable questions from reporters on why France has no plans for major austerity measures.

On Tuesday and Wednesday, most German newspaper editorials don't buy that logic, arguing that Franco-German relations are ailing and Merkel's decision is a sign of the malaise.

-----The conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:

"How else can one interpret this than as being a sign of irritation that has risen out of deep-seated differences of opinion, that the chancellor cancelled her meeting … at the last minute? … But a dispute like that is the last thing the EU and the German-French relationship needs right now. A rescue and lasting stabilization of the currency union will only happen if Paris and Berlin can negotiate as one on fundamental questions. Without credible German-French coordination, there will be no credibility in the euro zone."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,699672,00.html#ref=nlint

"Farmers are the only indispensable people on the face of the earth."

Li Zhaoxing. Ambassador, China

The monthly Coppock Indicators finished May:

DJIA: +276 UP. NASDAQ: +499 UP. SP500: +304 UP. The great Bull market goes on with the all three continuing higher in positive numbers, but is now under serious pressure.

Help the LIR fight Banksterism, the EU, and for sound money.

If you can, help the LIR stay around and make a difference. Please make a donation at the PayPal link on the website or better still become a sponsor for what looks like an exciting 2010. Capitalism not banksterism. Many thanks to all who have helped.