Thursday, 24 June 2021

When Things Go Wrong, They Go Wrong!

 Baltic Dry Index. 3147 +28   Brent Crude 75.31

Spot Gold 1775

Coronavirus Cases 02/04/20 World 1,000,000

Deaths 53,100

Coronavirus Cases 24/06/21 World 180,370,784

Deaths 3,907,592

24th June, 1812. Napoleon starts his invasion of Russia with almost half a million troops of his Grande Armee.  What could possibly go wrong?

French invasion of Russia

The French invasion of Russia, known in Russia as the Patriotic War of 1812 (Russian: Отечественная война 1812 года, romanizedOtechestvennaya voyna 1812 goda) and in France as the Russian campaign (French: Campagne de Russie), was begun by Napoleon to force Russia back into the Continental blockade of the United Kingdom.

On 24 June 1812 and the following days, the first wave of the Grande Armée crossed the border into Russia with around 400,000–450,000 soldiers,[18][19][20] the opposing Russian field forces amounted around 180,000–200,000 at this time.[21][22][20] Through a series of long forced marches Napoleon pushed his army rapidly through Western Russia in a futile attempt to destroy the retreating Russian Army of Michael Andreas Barclay de Tolly, winning just the Battle of Smolensk in August.

---- On 19 October, Napoleon left Moscow and marched southwest toward Kaluga trying to use unspoilt roads to retreat to Smolensk.[27] After the inconclusive Battle of Maloyaroslavets, Napoleon decided to use the old Smolensk road instead, but this road had already been devastated by his own army on the march to Moscow.[28] Lack of food for the men and fodder for the horses, hypothermia from the bitter cold and guerilla warfare from Russian peasants and Cossacks led to great losses. Three days after the battle of Berezina only around 10,000 soldiers of the main army remained.[29]

On 5 December, Napoleon left the army and returned to Paris.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_invasion_of_Russia

In answer to a question about yesterday’s LIR, I think Fed Chairman Powell was dissembling.  Chairman Powell is very smart. He didn’t get where he is by being clueless. Dissembling, perhaps, even probably. It’s often a reliable way to the top of the greasy pole for those willing to compromise themselves.

Dissembling for the good of the country, the banksters, politicians and the great unwashed hoi polloi, of course. After all, who wants to be blamed for telling the truth, we got it wrong.

“I have a higher and grander standard of principle than George Washington. He could not lie; I can, but I won't.”

Mark Twain. Why he can never be a central bankster.

In the stock casinos, confusion. With the US central banksters sending mixed, confused signals, they have succeeded in confusing the stock market gamblers. Do the Fedsters want runaway inflation or not?

It probably doesn’t matter anyway. If the Great US Western Drought doesn’t break within the next four weeks, if not sooner, a massive wave of food price inflation will roll out in the last quarter of 2021 and into 2022. And there’s nothing that any central bankster in the USA can do about it.

Asian shares tread water, markets eye U.S. inflation signals

June 22, 2021

A CDC safety group said there’s a “likely association” between a rare heart inflammatory condition in adolescents and young adults mostly after they’ve received their second Covid-19 vaccine shot, citing the most recent data available.

There have been more than 1,200 cases of a myocarditis or pericarditis mostly in people 30 and under who received Pfizer’s or Moderna’s Covid vaccine, according to a series of slide presentations published Wednesday for a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Myocarditis is the inflammation of the heart muscle, while pericarditis is the inflammation of the membrane surrounding the heart.

“Clinical presentation of myocarditis cases following vaccination has been distinct, occurring most often within one week after dose two, with chest pain as the most common presentation,” said Dr. Grace Lee, who chairs the committee’s safety group. CDC officials are gathering more data to fully understand the potential risks, how to manage it and whether there are any long-term issues, she said.

More

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/23/cdc-reports-more-than-1200-cases-of-rare-heart-inflammation-after-covid-vaccine-shots.html

Stanford study finds inflammation in brains of deceased COVID-19 patients

Rich Haridy  June 22, 2021

New research led by the Stanford School of Medicine is offering a detailed investigation into brain tissue from those who died from COVID-19. Although no trace of the SARS-CoV-2 virus could be detected, “profound molecular markers of inflammation” were seen, offering clues as to why some patients suffer expansive neurological symptoms following infection.

Stanford neuroscientist Tony Wyss-Coray is perhaps best known for his work transferring plasma from young mice into old mice and discovering it can reverse age-related cognitive decline. Those infamous studies inspired a variety of controversial companies promising to reverse aging through transfusions of young blood.

Wyss-Coray is still investigating exactly what mechanism can explain the mouse findings, and no evidence has yet appeared to show young blood confers those same beneficial effects in humans. One hypothesis is that inflammatory responses in the brain can be triggered by factors in the blood outside of the brain.

As the COVID-19 pandemic took off last year, Wyss-Coray noticed patients frequently reporting neurological symptoms accompanying infections. And many patients still reported neurological symptoms for months after recovering from any acute disease. So two questions framed this new research – can SARS-CoV-2 actually cross the blood-brain barrier to infect a human brain, and what unusual molecular markers can be detected in the brain of a deceased COVID-19 patient?

The research team systematically analyzed 30 brain tissue samples from eight COVID-19 patients and 14 healthy controls. The brain tissue came from the frontal cortex and choroid plexus.

Using single-cell RNA sequencing to measure the expression levels of genes in over 65,000 individual cells, the researchers found a large number of genes linked with inflammatory processes were activated in the brain tissue of COVID-19 patients. Levels of T cells were also more abundant in the COVID-19 patient brains than healthy controls.

“Viral infection appears to trigger inflammatory responses throughout the body that may cause inflammatory signaling across the blood-brain barrier, which in turn could trip off neuroinflammation in the brain,” explains Wyss-Coray. “It’s likely that many COVID-19 patients, especially those reporting or exhibiting neurological problems or those who are hospitalized, have these neuroinflammatory markers we saw in the people we looked at who had died from the disease.”

Wyss-Coray says the molecular markers of inflammation detected in the study share distinct features with what is observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

It is important to note none of the patients displayed any signs of neurological impairment prior to their death. Further work looking for signs of neuroinflammation in cerebrospinal fluid from surviving COVID-19 patients will be necessary to better understand the potential long-term implications.

More

https://newatlas.com/science/stanford-inflammation-brain-tissue-coronavirus-neurological-long-covid/?utm_source=New+Atlas+Subscribers&utm_campaign=a31cc78f11-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_06_23_08_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-a31cc78f11-90625829

But should we be vaccinating at all, at least with the current vaccines? A prominent virologist says no. Approx. 29 minutes.

The Vaccines: Awesome Ingenuity or A Huge Mistake?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjMZvpmuaKY

REVEALED: Google & USAID Funded Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak’s Virus Experiments For Over A Decade.

June 19, 2021

Google funded research conducted by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance – a controversial group which has openly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “killer” bat coronavirus research – for over a decade, The National Pulse can today reveal.

The unearthed financial ties between EcoHealth Alliance and Google follow months of big tech censorship of stories and individuals in support of the COVID-19 “lab leak” theory.

The Google-backed EcoHealth Alliance played a critical role in the cover-up of COVID-19’s origins through its president, Peter Daszak.

Daszak served on the wildly compromised World Health Organization’s (WHO) COVID-19 investigation team. He championed the efforts to “debunk” the lab origin theory of the virus, despite mounting support for the claim first made by experts on Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic podcast in early January 2020.

Left-wing websites masquerading as “fact checkers” still call the lab theory “false,” despite the shift in tone from the Biden regime, leading world scientists, and intelligence officials.

EcoHealth Alliance also funneled hundreds of thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to its research partner, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to conduct studies on “killer” bat coronaviruses.

More

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/google-funded-wuhan-linked-ecohealth-research/

Next, some vaccine links kindly sent along from a LIR reader in Canada. The links come from a most informative update from Stanford Hospital in California.

World Health Organization - Landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccineshttps://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines

NY Times Coronavirus Vaccine Trackerhttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html

Stanford Websitehttps://racetoacure.stanford.edu/clinical-trials/132

Regulatory Focus COVID-19 vaccine trackerhttps://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker

Some other useful Covid links.

Johns Hopkins Coronavirus resource centre

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

Rt Covid-19

https://rt.live/

Centers for Disease Control Coronavirus

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html

The Spectator Covid-19 data tracker (UK)

https://data.spectator.co.uk/city/national 


Technology Update.

With events happening fast in the development of solar power and graphene, I’ve added this section. Updates as they get reported.

'Flashed' nanodiamonds are just a phase

Rice produces fluorinated nanodiamond, graphene, concentric carbon via flash Joule heating

Date: June 21, 2021

Source: Rice University

Summary: A new 'flash' process can turn carbon black into functionalized nanodiamond and other materials. The carbon atoms evolved through several phases depending on the length of the flash.

Diamond may be just a phase carbon goes through when exposed to a flash of heat, but that makes it far easier to obtain.

The Rice University lab of chemist James Tour is now able to "evolve" carbon through phases that include valuable nanodiamond by tightly controlling the flash Joule heating process they developed 18 months ago.

Best of all, they can stop the process at will to get product they want.

In the American Chemical Society journal ACS Nano, the researchers led by Tour and graduate student and lead author Weiyin Chen show that adding organic fluorine compounds and fluoride precursors to elemental carbon black turns it into several hard-to-get allotropes when flashed, including fluorinated nanodiamonds, fluorinated turbostratic graphene and fluorinated concentric carbon.

With the flash process introduced in 2020, a strong jolt of electricity can turn carbon from just about any source into layers of pristine turbostratic graphene in less than a second. ("Turbostratic" means the layers are not strongly bound to each other, making them easier to separate in a solution.)

The new work shows it's possible to modify, or functionalize, the products at the same time. The duration of the flash, between 10 and 500 milliseconds, determines the final carbon allotrope.

The difficulty lies in how to preserve the fluorine atoms, since the ultrahigh temperature causes the volatilization of all atoms other than carbon. To overcome the problem, the team used a Teflon tube sealed with graphite spacers and high-melting-point tungsten rods, which can hold the reactant inside and avoid the loss of fluorine atoms under the ultrahigh temperature. The improved sealed tube is important, Tour said.

"In industry, there has been a long-standing use for small diamonds in cutting tools and as electrical insulators," he said. "The fluorinated version here provides a route to modifications of these structures. And there is a large demand for graphene, while the fluorinated family is newly produced here in bulk form."

---- Nanodiamonds are highly desirable for electronics applications, as they can be doped to serve as wide-bandgap semiconductors, important components in current research by Rice and the Army Research Laboratory.

The new process simplifies the doping part, not only for nanodiamonds but also for the other allotropes. Tour said the Rice lab is exploring the use of boron, phosphorous and nitrogen as additives as well.

At longer flash times, the researchers got nanodiamonds embedded in concentric shells of fluorinated carbon. Even longer exposure converted the diamond entirely into shells, from the outside in.

"The concentric-shelled structures have been used as lubricant additives, and this flash method might provide an inexpensive and fast route to these formations," Tour said.

More

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/06/210621160535.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmatter_energy%2Fgraphene+%28Graphene+News+--+ScienceDaily%29

23-24 June, 1314. The Battle of Bannockburn, Stirlingshire. What could possibly go wrong?

The Battle of Bannockburn (Scottish Gaelic: Blàr Allt nam Bànag or Blàr Allt a' Bhonnaich) on 23 and 24 June 1314 was a victory of the army of King of Scots Robert the Bruce over the army of King Edward II of England in the First War of Scottish Independence. Although it did not bring an end to the war, as victory would only be secured 14 years later, Bannockburn is still a major landmark in Scottish history.

---- The precise numerical advantage of the English forces relative to the Scottish forces is unknown, but modern researchers estimate that the Scottish faced English forces one-and-a-half to two or three times their size.

---- Most medieval battles were short-lived, lasting only a few hours, so the Battle of Bannockburn is unusual in that it lasted two days.

---- Edward fled with his personal bodyguard and panic spread among the remaining troops, turning their defeat into a rout. King Edward with about 500 men first fled for Stirling Castle where Sir Philip de Moubray, commander of the castle, turned him away as the castle would shortly be surrendered to the Scots.[32] Then, pursued by James Douglas and a small troop of horsemen, Edward fled to Dunbar Castle, from which he took a ship to Berwick.

---- Weighing the available evidence, Reese concludes that "it seems doubtful if even a third of the foot soldiers returned to England."[33] If his estimate is accurate, of 16,000 English infantrymen, about 11,000 were killed. The English chronicler Thomas Walsingham gave the number of English men-at-arms who were killed as 700,[6] while 500 more men-at-arms were spared for ransom.[7] The Scottish losses appear to have been comparatively light, with only two knights among those killed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bannockburn

No comments:

Post a Comment